Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They do self learn fast, but that wouldn't help much with cold starts as the widebands aren't very accurate initially.

Holden were still using the Continental ethanol sensors until recently, when they ditched flex fuel. I am getting a free sensor from one of the Holden design techs as he has no use for it anymore.

When I was tuned on e70 a few years ago I used to fill at the Powerplus e85 pump and add 6L or so to the mix to keep the wideband happy. It just becomes a pain in the arse, better to tune on e85 and run a little rich on the e70 if you use it.

We don't have United E85 in Hobbitville yet but there are two Eflex outlets so that's what I run . For street only I think Eflex is a little more user friendly in some ways and still better turbo tucker than 98 PULP .

A while back a few here did tests to show the power difference between E70 and E85 but I can't remember if it was that much of a difference . Someone else said recently that the knock resistance with ethanol flattens out at about 40-50% so if that's true the benefit of more must be extra evaporative charge cooling .

That aside I didn't realise the General had given up on flex fuel and it would be interesting to know why .

A .

  • Like 1

Because it's shit fuel for a low compression NA V8, as long as they try to make the engine compatible with 91, it will never run well on ethanol imo, not without bumping the compression or charging. Economy was down 30% with no real power gains. The bogan crowd have always been against ethanol in their fuel so don't care if it's dropped, and with Caltex trying to get out of their contract, Holden would know flex fuel is dead in the water here. Only GM US were pushing them to use it, for the green aspect.

I have done power back to back tests between the brands, there was only 4kw in it. I will be filling on eflex in Canberra soon, apparently there is an airport run coming up and I want to see what the wagon can do when I stretch her legs. ;)

I agree , any engine built and tuned to run low octane fuel never gained anything out of better juice and went backwards on alcohol fuels consumption wise . The sad fact is that Joe Average buys the cheapest fuel he can get and the manufacturers are well aware of it .

It's beyond the scope of this thread but IMO the sooner we get a consistent lower blend like 25 to 40% the less the general public would fear ethanol . Most people I speak to , performance people aside , tell me how it burns out your seals and engine and are aghast when I tell them about using 70% for long enough to know better .

The problem is that people know that E10 is cheap and not very fuel efficient and assume if 10% is bad more must be worse . The other sad fact is that EPAs the world over wanted Ethanol (E10) for failed f**kwit green reasons and all it ever did was make in theory emissions content look a smidge cleaner .

I don't see too many manufacturers lining up to make E100 engines and as long as ULP engines are the norm you'll always get a consumption penalty burning high ethanol blend fuels . To get the best of both for volume sales setting the bar at the effective knock limit percentage means better consumption per litre and that's the thing people care most about .

With E85, the closest United to me that sells it is Dee Why. That's still about 20-25 minutes from my place. I'm wondering how long you can keep fuel sitting around in drums before it absorbs too much water? Or if you have it sealed is it pretty much a non-issue?

I also have a 200L drum under the house I could clean out and use with a hand pump but I'm not sure how well I could seal it.

Tuner mentioned that as more water enters the fuel, the octane number drops slightly potentially causing det for an entire drum of fuel. He also mentioned something about people having rusted injectors from it in cases where the car isn't driven more than once a fortnight etc. I'm not worried about that personally just curious if anyone has heard of anything. Thanks

Edited by Blackkers

If it's a daily it won't be an issue.

I used to use a 220L drum, I filled it with 20psi air pressure to pump the fuel out a servo style nozzle, it filled the car tank in no time. You are welcome to it if you are local, I now just use the low 20L red Bunnings drums as they are easier to transport.

It will keep fine if in a sealed container.

  • 2 weeks later...

Things are looking like changing in America with ethanol fuel blends and there is a push to introduce E15 for cars made from/after 2oo1 - or was it 2007 ? I think the corn growers want to expand ethanol production which means introducing blends greater than 10% .

Real world I think the problem is that E10 is made with ~ 90% piss grade ULP and all the 10% ethanol content does is make many engines run leaner . In other words there isn't enough ethanol in it to raise the octane rating to the point where knock sensors stay dormant and not cause the system to retard the ignition timing . More ethanol ie 15%+ can raise the octane rating of 91ULP but it seems you need a computer smart enough to compensate for the leaner AFR .

I did find a few reports OS showing how some blends in the E20-E30 range can match and sometimes very slightly better consumption compared to 91 ULP .

There was another interesting fact that the oil co's are blending the ethanol and then setting the price of blended fuels meaning they are controlling the consumer price of the ethanol content which is a rort . Ethanol is shit loads cheaper to produce than ULP but to look at the price of E70/85 on the pumps you wouldn't think so . It's a shame independents can't source bulk ethanol and buy/blend ULP at reasonable rates to reduce the end price for us . Obviously the oil co's see ethanol as a threat and given a choice there wouldn't be any in fuel at all .

I hope that E15-25 blends become available here and someone with enough of a public following can prove that there is no disadvantage in using it in cars made in the last 7-10 years . Joe average still thinks ethanol burns out the seals in his engine killing it but who's ever seen that happen ?

I think we are going to have to stand up for ethanol blends of which E10 is a waste of time . The main stream is clearly not interested in E70-85 because the cost of motoring is their main concern and at those levels there's nothing in it for them with engines optimised for 91-95 ULP . Main stream sales ultimately make or break any products success and ethanols survival will depend on govt legislation , read green slime garbage , and possibly low to mid percentage blends if they are cost effective for Joe average .

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Shell sells e85 now?

Get a tune on United, then run whatever you like. Safe as houses.

Am I thinking caltex or shell? Who other than united sells a high ethanol content fuel in Sydney? and is it essentially the same as united e85?

I can't wait to tune for e85 just have to sort out a solid intake, bigger injectors, fuel pump then i'll be knocking the tuners door down

Edited by Blackkers

United have brought out and app that lets uses your location to tell you the closest service stations and the cost for the day, and of course which fuels they have on site...

I searched "united" in the app store..

Happy Days :yes:

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

huh? Heaps of track and drift cars run it.

Edited by superben

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...