Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guest Robo's

Ok, after i tuned my R33, and now driving around for a few weeks i've found im getting a flat spot in the power curve. It has exceptional strong mid range and top end (6000-7000) but i notice ive got a dead spot around the 5,000 mark. Like mid range is strong, then it goes flat, and then strong to redline. Overall im kicking out around 210rwkw which feels strong, but i feel if i can get that flatness out i would be happier even more. Im only tuning it with a SAFC, i havent started playing with timing yet although i reckon im on the mark as it used to ping with the stock cooler, not so with the FMIC.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41419-rb-25-flat-spot/
Share on other sites

The best way is to get it properly checked on a dyno, and the tuner can enrich/lean out your mixture with the S-AFC in this range, depending what its doing (the only way to know is to get it properly checked).

Another cheaters way is to undo the bolts to the crank angle sensor and turn the housing a few degrees (so you can just see where the old bolt mark was) and tighten. This advances the timing slightly, it gave me an extra 12rwkw when I did this on the dyno.

Good luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41419-rb-25-flat-spot/#findComment-850811
Share on other sites

Have you checked your airflow meter reading on the AFC? Mine hit 5.115V at around 4.5-5k rpm with 200rwkw, which wasnt a problem until I got a cold day. Net result was detonation on colder days - perhaps you are leaning out and the ecu has pulled some timing.

If it was a one off occurence, it is possible the ecu has pulled some timing in that range - how lucky do you feel:)

Best bet is put the car on a dyno where they can check. Even if a tune was done 2 weeks ago, a cold day and you are in trouble when you tune on the edge.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41419-rb-25-flat-spot/#findComment-850875
Share on other sites

Guest Robo's

She is not pinging at all now, i havent heard it ping since installing the FMIC, which makes me think some more timing could go in. But with the stock cooler, i used to get some ping up high and i havent adjusted the timing at all, just the A/F ratios. A/F ratios are as good as we can get with the SAFC, between low 11's and high 11's. We can never get A/F ratios to be nice and steady due to the limitations of the SAFC, but we are trying hard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41419-rb-25-flat-spot/#findComment-850961
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...