Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

oh gawd.

so many memories of 2011 race. wish I was there again.

webche on pole. finishes 3rd and picks alonso up who rides on the side pod, due to running out of fuel.

alonso-sobre-rb7-webber-nurburgring-2011

Ditto...I was in belgium at a pub in Bruge watching quali and Webber putting it on pole and Cadel win the Tour in the time trial. I then drove overnight to pick up a friend from Frankfurt airport and we were debating whether to head back to Nurburgeing to watch Mark or head to a pub across the border in France to watch on the tv.

In hindsight we made the right call as Webber let that one get away from him./ Not this year though :)

You mean the office that took the fastest car in the field and tuned it into a jalopy that cant even break into Q3, is running 6th in the WCC and is 182 points behind the leader with more than half the season still remaining?

That design office?

Perhaps that is a talent... who am I to judge.

at least there's Jenson

that boy can extract the best from any machinery ;]

Im not sure all that is correct but the conclusion is unduly harsh. What you have to remember is that there is fk all in the way of testing anymore. Which affects Pirelli massively. The different cars use the same tyres very differently.

There's little testing with the teams, but Pirelli can formulate and test their own tyres in their own simulated workshop surely? Road tyres don't get tested on every single model of car they may fit, some assumptions are made about how drivers will use them - properly and improperly - and then the designs are made conservative so that the tyre is as safe as possible.

In any case, I agree that the blame goes 3 ways - Ecclestone for asking Pirelli to make shit tyres, Pirelli agreeing to make shit tyres and the teams not jumping up and down and boycotting this farce where they drive most of the grand prix at 7/10ths of full speed because they're in "tyre management" or "fuel management" and then we have an amazing 10 laps at the end.

Throttle's on the right, boys. Smash that carnt through the firewall and have a RACE for once!!

at least there's Jenson

that boy can extract the best from any machinery ;]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the car has no understeer or oversteer, no cross winds, no sun in his eyes, a slower team mate then he really does get the best out of any machinery.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the car has no understeer or oversteer, no cross winds, no sun in his eyes, a slower team mate then he really does get the best out of any machinery.

Sorry but have to agree lol

Every radio conversation when he isn't doing well - "the front tyres have gone" "The rears have no grip" "there's to much understeer"

Maybe I'm missing something but I was suprised Webber and/or Alonso didn't get a penalty or fine from that stunt above.

Not dissapointed about it, but just thought the stewards would frown on that a bit

So far a good weekend. Kimi and Romain strong. Mark on the second row on the clean side....AND Dan gets P6 again! Even if RBR dont grab him he is doing enough to surely be on the minds of other teams who my be looking to fill the seat vacated by the guy that goes to Ferrari or RBR

I dare say Lotus may be looking for a second driver next year. I think Dan would fit in well there if he doesn't get the Red Bull seat

Far out the commentry is pretty average. Allan Jones "There's a kink in one of the DRS zones which will make it very tricky if its wet" even though they turn DRS off in the rain.....

And Crofty in Q2 I think saying "We are yet to see a Red Bull" even though both Red Bull drivers had a time up

Commentators shouldn't be making the rookie errors that they do

Anyway. Good qualifying session :) Lotus in with a chance. Just need Hamilton and Vettel to take each other out at the start and Kimi to win to spice the championship up again

Kimi has signed at redbull

2 yr contact with a clause to get out at the

End of the 1st

Eric bollier is to take over at mclaren

Witmarsh to leave mclaren

Kimi has almost no social ties and expectation.

And will be given equal chance against vettel...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...