Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

p2 Times
01 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:34.154 31 laps
02 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:34.184 +0.030s 26 laps
03 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:34.282 +0.128 29 laps
04 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:34.310 +0.15628 laps
05 Paul di Resta Force India 1:34.543 + 0.389 35 laps
06 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:34.552s +0.398 34 laps
07 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:34.631 +0.477 33 laps
08 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:34.666 +0.512 37 laps
09 Adrian Sutil Force India 1:34.932 +0.778 33 laps
10 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1:34.976 +0.822 29 laps
11 Jenson Button McLaren 1:35.356 +1.202 32 laps
12 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:35.506 +1.352 36 laps
13 Sergio Perez McLaren 1:35.559 +1.435 36 laps
14 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:35.761 +1.607 33 laps
15 Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1:36.133 +1.979 36 laps
16 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:36.279 +2.125 33 laps
17 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1:36.579 +2.425 28 laps
18 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1:36.616 +2.462 34 laps
19 Charles Pic Caterham 1:37.061 +2.907 32 laps
20 Max Chilton Marussia 1:37.313 +3.159 33 laps
21 Jules Bianchi Marussia 1:37.363s +3.209 29 laps
22 Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1:37.970 +3.816 34 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8652814/Kimi-Tops-Friday-s-Running-In-Bahrain

Heikki Kovalainen says Caterham need to improve the back end of their CT03 after driving the "unbalanced" car for the first time in FP1.

"I think it's quite different to last year's," Kovalainen said.

"Fundamentally it's the same, obviously tyres and set-up has changed. It's quite a different feeling. If I was racing, I would start looking to make changes straight away to get it more how I think it should be.

"It's more unbalanced than I experienced last year. It's more difficult to nail a good lap. I think in qualifying, when the tyres are fresh, the car is a bit more average. But to a certain extent it's not a surprise because of the way the car has been modified.

"In terms of the differences, there's a direction. But with the tyres that we have now, I'm not convinced it's the right way to go. Maybe we should reconsider the set-up direction."

Kovalainen, though, believes Caterham can improve the car but admits it won't be a quick fix.

"I think part of it is solvable with set-up, but when we improve the car and bring upgrades, there's one area we really need to improve and that's the back end of the car."

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8652995/Heikki-CT03-is-unbalanced

Pirelli will decide next week whether or not any changes are needed to its compounds for this year, but warned its critics that any changes are likely to be minimal.

"The reality is we are not going to do something that will suit one team," said Hembery, who says that eight teams have asked Pirelli not to make any changes to the compounds for this season.

"We know what is coming up in terms of the season, and we know the results we have seen. It is not what you are seeing here, it is what is to come that we have to worry about.

"We have to take that into account otherwise we might be walking into bigger problems and then have eight teams coming to us and going: 'you do need to make a change'.

"If we do anything it will be done in the early phase of the season and then we will leave it. It is what it is then; and for better or worse you let everyone get on with it.

"You want everything you do done very early on to avoid exactly that accusation that you are influencing something. But whatever we do, we will still be maintaining a much softer tyre range than we had last year."

Hembery said the most likely tweaks will be made to the current soft and hard compounds, and only to ensure they have a better operating window.

"We might have to move the working range of the compounds down a bit, particularly when we get to cooler races," he said.

"It is all minor stuff and it is not maybe in the direction that some would like."

Pirelli is also pressing ahead with plans to give teams an extra set of durable tyres for use in first free practice at the Spanish Grand Prix, even though agreement for them only to be available to rookie drivers does not appear to be forthcoming.

"At the moment we have proposed it and we intend to provide it [the extra set], but we haven't yet had the feedback from the teams' meetings that they have had," he said.

"They are trying to establish who should be able to use those tyres, and that is the current sticking point. We have said we don't want to get involved in that: it is up to them to get consensus."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/106894

nando gone for a spin.

It's extremely rare to see Alonso make a mistake, but the car looked a little unstable on turn in before he decided to "hold it flat"...followed by Homo's left rear down to the steel...high tyre wear or carcass fail? Most likely the latter :)

Pos  Driver               Team/Car              Time       Gap       Laps 1.  Fernando Alonso      Ferrari               1m33.247s            12 2.  Sebastian Vettel     Red Bull-Renault      1m33.348s  + 0.101s  15 3.  Mark Webber          Red Bull-Renault      1m33.380s  + 0.133s  19 4.  Kimi Raikkonen       Lotus-Renault         1m33.446s  + 0.199s  21 5.  Lewis Hamilton       Mercedes              1m33.455s  + 0.208s  19 6.  Romain Grosjean      Lotus-Renault         1m33.464s  + 0.217s  19 7.  Adrian Sutil         Force India-Mercedes  1m33.596s  + 0.349s  17 8.  Paul di Resta        Force India-Mercedes  1m33.700s  + 0.453s  15 9.  Nico Rosberg         Mercedes              1m33.764s  + 0.517s  1910.  Nico Hulkenberg      Sauber-Ferrari        1m33.922s  + 0.675s  1711.  Felipe Massa         Ferrari               1m33.949s  + 0.702s  2012.  Jenson Button        McLaren-Mercedes      1m34.117s  + 0.870s  1713.  Sergio Perez         McLaren-Mercedes      1m34.282s  + 1.035s  1814.  Daniel Ricciardo     Toro Rosso-Ferrari    1m34.577s  + 1.330s  1615.  Valtteri Bottas      Williams-Renault      1m34.611s  + 1.364s  1716.  Jean-Eric Vergne     Toro Rosso-Ferrari    1m34.678s  + 1.431s  1617.  Pastor Maldonado     Williams-Renault      1m34.833s  + 1.586s  1718.  Charles Pic          Caterham-Renault      1m35.816s  + 2.569s  1619.  Jules Bianchi        Marussia-Cosworth     1m36.731s  + 3.484s  1720.  Giedo van der Garde  Caterham-Renault      1m36.939s  + 3.692s  1621.  Max Chilton          Marussia-Cosworth     1m37.630s  + 4.383s  722.  Esteban Gutierrez    Sauber-Ferrari        1m39.592s  + 6.345s  28

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/106906

It's extremely rare to see Alonso make a mistake, but the car looked a little unstable on turn in before he decided to "hold it flat"...followed by Homo's left rear down to the steel...high tyre wear or carcass fail? Most likely the latter :)

if we're lucky pirelli will tell us what happened.

Lewis Hamilton's left-rear tyre failure during Saturday morning practice for the Bahrain Grand Prix, which led to his five-place grid penalty, was caused by metal debris, according to Pirelli.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/106928

another mediocre weekend for McLaren coming up

man this whip needs some serious upgrades before getting into the Euro races

Nothing is wrong with the car, button is just so shit that it reflects poorly on the whole team

Such a bad management decision to have him lead anything. It will take them years to recover from this

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
    • So my car is finally back from paint! This took an absolutely insane amount of work and should get it's own build thread - but I didn't build it. It was completed by Troy @ https://scalekustoms.com.au/ I originally bought the AOSHIMA URAS Type R kit while I was in Japan, it's supposed to look like this when assembled: Now, I thought that was cool enough until I opened the box with Dismay, as there's no way I could possibly have completed it. The thing is 1/24 and has details down to the steering wheel horn button, which is a 2mm diameter sticker. I originally wondered if someone could make it at all, as is - But then things got a little carried away. It's worth noting that the model does not have an openable bonne, let alone engine bay, OR an openable boot. - Troy has worked wonders with 3D printer and presumably better eyes than I will ever have. My photos suck, so I will post up some of his in-progress ones he sent to me during the way. Unsuprisingly, he is very detailed. A lot of these are out of order. But he: 1) Made a LS engine and an engine bay appear out of thin air 2) Made the bonnet removable 3) Printed the rims I will buy in the future (or any rim you want) 4) Printed and added the wing that is going on 5) Tinted my back windows as this is what my car has IRL (privacy glass) 6) Added a licence plate. 7) Somehow did the interior 8) 3D Printed my actual seats 9) Made the exhaust under the car connect even though this is likely invisible. 10) Created a boot with my fking battery box, power steering reservoir, subwoofer and toolboxes back there. To say it's insane is an understatement. And I f**ked it all up because when I was re-mounting the wing (it broke in transit) I spilled glue everywhere and ripped paint up and Gregged the rear half of the car. Which about makes sense. Also, this arrived on the same day. Quite the change from: I spent 16 hours per day over the next 3 days pre-christmas putting the interior back together, mounting lip, fixing various bodykit problems with window mouldings, etc. and servicing, rebuilding my 370z brakes to go on the car 'soon', messing with heights to check clearances for new wheels, etc. I also had a foray into mounting wiper-mounted washer jets which was an absolute disaster. The bodyshop has welded (and painted) over the stock jet locations for reasons unknown to everybody (i.e they forgot) I also wanted to wire in the oil pressure sensor on Christmas Eve which was a BAD IDEA. You do not know terror like pulling your ECU apart, pinning in half-fitting pins that aren't the right ones, but trying anyway because it's Christmas eve, putting your ECU back together and having a no-start condition with a fuel pump not priming. Then you undo all your work and the fuel pump still doesn't prime. So after all that terror and horror and pain and tedious disassembly, the issue was the relay in the boot which seems to have died/stuck when I was turning the car off and on about 700 times testing shitty washer jets. I also re-wired the fuel pump power plug which fell apart in my hands. I am very happy I had 3 extra pre-made ones from a few posts/last Christmas's breakdown. https://bluewireautomotive.com/products/10-x-pcm-ecm-ecu-terminals I have put an order for these in, so I can actually add the pins to the ECU properly. The commodore ECU does not have the pins for Oil Pressure via ODB2. However the ECU can support it if you create the pins and wire them in. So for round two, and somehow attempting to route that into the engine bay through my impossible engine bay grommet is a fight for another day. It's 40C in Melbourne tomorrow, I am half tempted to drive the car with the aircon on to deliver presents to my partner's family and see if it helps with the overheating-on-40C-days-in-traffic-with-aircon-on-only issue that the vents were intended to solve. Do I feel lucky?
    • Yes, while being... strictly unnecessary. Tuning is a bit like quantum physics. You don't need to understand what Schroedinger's equation actually means. You just need to run the computation and accept the answers. With tuning, you just push page up/down until the exhaust tells you that you've got the fuel right. The VE can stay hidden behind the curtain like the Wizard of Oz and you'll never need to know what he looked like.
×
×
  • Create New...