Shoota's R33 GT-R RB30/26

[Shoota_77]

22 minutes ago, Duncan said:

Good call, and dial 00 and be ready to hit one more.

Not saying it isn't safe....but I'd be more scared than first start on a rebuilt RB

Stop making me overthink it! 🤣🤣

[GTSBoy]

Just use the correct PPE

[Shoota_77]

4 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Just use the correct PPE

Better crush protection-

 

[Looney_Head]

35 minutes ago, Shoota_77 said:

Better crush protection-

 

Tis but a scratch....

[Shoota_77]

16 minutes ago, Looney_Head said:

Tis but a scratch....

Good old Monty Python!

[GTSBoy]

What starts as a scratch, becomes a flesh wound, then quadruple amputation.

Jus' sayin'.

Crush resistant gloves (The ones with the rubber strips down the back of the hand and fingers) might not be a bad idea after all!

[MBS206]

The correct PPE is to get one of the kids to spin it while you film from a safe distance...

[Shoota_77]

45 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

The correct PPE is to get one of the kids to spin it while you film from a safe distance...

This makes sense. I have 2 so I'll just choose the least favourable child to perform the task.  If all turns to shit, I've still got a spare.  Win-win!

[Looney_Head]

9 hours ago, Shoota_77 said:

This makes sense. I have 2 so I'll just choose the least favourable child to perform the task.  If all turns to shit, I've still got a spare.  Win-win!

this is the reason we have more than one child right?

[MBS206]

31 minutes ago, Looney_Head said:

this is the reason we have more than one child right?

It's also the reason neither Duncan or I can own a car rotisserie

[Shoota_77]

2 hours ago, Looney_Head said:

this is the reason we have more than one child right?

Yep, it's why in Australia we never brought in the 1 child policy like China.  China can't afford to use the shit they make in their own country as it's too much to risk having only one child...  Or maybe that's how they test their shit before they send it to Australia - they use the second kid that families had when they weren't supposed to as the tester?  They weren't supposed to exist in the first place so no loss if they succumb to a work place incident?  🤣

[MBS206]

6 hours ago, Shoota_77 said:

Yep, it's why in Australia we never brought in the 1 child policy like China.  China can't afford to use the shit they make in their own country as it's too much to risk having only one child...  Or maybe that's how they test their shit before they send it to Australia - they use the second kid that families had when they weren't supposed to as the tester?  They weren't supposed to exist in the first place so no loss if they succumb to a work place incident?  🤣

The moment I read "never brought in the 1 child policy like China" I was ready to send a reply "it's what they use the second child in china for..." Ha ha ha

I can tell how quickly your brain squirrels 😛