Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!!

After driving my car around with 260rwkws (stock ecu/turbos) for three months, the hunger for more power was unbareable, so I went on the costly journey a lot of GTR owners decide to take....

My car has finally undergone the turbo upgrade, and after much deliberation decided to go for the Trust T517Z turbo kit. These turbos were chosen as everyone opts for the HKS 2530s, so I decided to be different and more importantly wanted to see the difference between the two, mainly POWER, RESPONSE, LAG...

These are the performance modifications undergone with the upgrade:

- Power FC

- Nismo AFM x2

- Trust Fuel Rail

- Trust 720cc Injectors

- SARD Fuel Pressure Regulator

- Trust T517Z 8cm2 turbos x2

- Bosch 044 Fuel Pump

- HKS EVC4 Boost Controller

- Custom Catch Can

- Daiken Exedy Twin Plate Clutch (converted to push type)

On the dyno the car pumped out 324 rwkws at 20psi (1.3bar). I was very happy with the result, but noticed that car was much laggier which was expected.... However when full boost hits (around 4800rpm), u can't help but smile!!!!!

In the next couple of weeks, there will be a comparison between my car and Simon's car (meshmesh) who has the exact modifications except HKS 2530 turbo kit.... The comparison will be done on the same dyno, same day....

Anyway heres the dyno sheet:

(NOTE: This was NOT done in 'SHOOTOUT MODE')

http://www.meggala.com/T517Za.gif

P.S Big thanx to Gerald and Nigel at Ice Performance!!!!!

And BIG THANX to Steve aka meggala!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41542-dyno-result-t517zs-on-gtr/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

intresting dude, thanx for posting, maybe try cam gears as well those turbos are supposed to have bugger all lag compared to the 2530's, good luck.

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!!

After driving my car around with 260rwkws (stock ecu/turbos) for three months, the hunger for more power was unbareable, so I went on the costly journey a lot of GTR owners decide to take....

My car has finally undergone the turbo upgrade, and after much deliberation decided to go for the Trust T517Z turbo kit. These turbos were chosen as everyone opts for the HKS 2530s, so I decided to be different and more importantly wanted to see the difference between the two, mainly POWER, RESPONSE, LAG...

These are the performance modifications undergone with the upgrade:

- Power FC

- Nismo AFM x2

- Trust Fuel Rail

- Trust 720cc Injectors

- SARD Fuel Pressure Regulator

- Trust T517Z 10cm2 turbos x2

- Bosch 044 Fuel Pump

- HKS EVC4 Boost Controller

- Custom Catch Can

- Daiken Exedy Twin Plate Clutch (converted to push type)

On the dyno the car pumped out 324 rwkws at 20psi (1.3bar). I was very happy with the result, but noticed that car was much laggier which was expected.... However when full boost hits (around 4800rpm), u can't help but smile!!!!!

In the next couple of weeks, there will be a comparison between my car and Simon's car (meshmesh) who has the exact modifications except HKS 2530 turbo kit.... The comparison will be done on the same dyno, same day....

Anyway heres the dyno sheet:

(NOTE: This was NOT done in 'SHOOTOUT MODE')

http://www.meggala.com/T517Za.gif

P.S Big thanx to Gerald and Nigel at Ice Performance!!!!!

And BIG THANX to Steve aka meggala!!!!!

Hey Jack... either way you gotta be happy :rofl:. The boys were always pretty confident about your car making the power..no probs. I think it was only a concern about lag?? But by what you say @4800~rpm, that sounds about the same as mine. I tried to do an overlay of your dyno that you emailed me against mine, but the Kmh per hours are set differently, and I think you'll find that yours is not that laggy after all, in comparison my 2530's set up.

Hopefully my friggin clutch arrives next week. :rofl: once it does, we'll organise a day with the boys on the dyno.

Tribex.. I think Jack does have cam gear?? he can confirm, also jack did you end up putting some lightened pulleys? If so do you notice any difference?

Well done.

I'm curious, what did you make at 1 bar? what are these turbos equivilant too? are you running stock internals?

for cost of the PFC and Nismo AFM's I mite recommend the Wolf3d V4 which will also give you boost control and allow you to run a MAP table. Overall a very nice result can you do a run in shootout mode so I can compare my figures to yours?

my chart can be found here http://summoner.perthstreetcars.net/Cefiro...o/mark_dyno.JPG and this was done in shootout at 1 bar.

tribex- yes your right, they are meant to be less laggier than 2530s, but in the 8cm2 version, mine are the 10cm2 version so maybe that's why they are laggier?? Dunno...

Yes I have Trust cam gears....

Doughboy- standard cams, standard headgasket...

meshmesh- yeah full boost is around 5000rpm, getting used to the lag now!!!! As far as the Trust pulley kit, not sure if it made a difference....

rev210- yeah saw that thread, these turbos are apparently capable of 2 bar, don't know about reliability.... my car gets driven on weekends only, so doesn't clock up the k's....

summoner- I'm not sure what the car makes at 1bar, pretty useless running at 1 bar might aswell stay with stock turbos...

These turbos are equivalent to HKS 2530s rated at 600hp for both of them...

Yes running stock internals....

Didn't want to use anything but Power FC, personal preference....

Will do a readout in shootout mode in a couple of weeks when we do the comparison between my car and Simon's (meshmesh)... STAY TUNED!!!! By the way what turbos you running???

Don't think itas tailing off that much, feels very strong.... will have to check it out next time...

for cost of the PFC and Nismo AFM's I mite recommend the Wolf3d V4 which will also give you boost control and allow you to run a MAP table.

Summoner - you should know the rules by now! It's not permitted to use Wolf on GTRs in the Eastern States! :jk:

hope you got $'s for a spare engine then cause you'll need it.

We limited mine to 1bar boost and its running stupidly rich(fouls up plugs) so going to have to drop it down to maybe 12psi and cleantune up. Over 450rwhp and imho you are risking the engine.

My turbo's are equivilant to around hi flo 2540's... Efficiency is the key

I may not know the intricacies of tuning, but wtf has boost got to do with running rich/lean? Sounds more like your tuner hasn't got his fuel mapping correct than whether you're running too much boost...

I'm running 2530s at 19psi and my AFR is sitting dead on 12.0, I don't know why you'd want to run these turbos at a lower boost pressure than that.

Great figures without cams - I did a fair bit of reading on these Trust turbos and found alot of overseas people (UK) had major problems with longevity.

Trust may well have fixed this problem but if they havent I understand the following is the go:

1. upgraded thrust bearing

2. Oil cooler to reduce temps as they are oil cooled

3. hope for the best

Not wanting to appear pessemistic just what I have herd.

Jeremy

summoner & jezzzr, that's the first time I've heard such claims about the trust kits. At the same time, I'm taking it with a grain of salt, mainly because one of AU's most respected gtr builders Ben from racepace recommended these and infact built Ph1's GTR also with the Trust turbo's. Ph1 is pushing around 350rwk with these turbo's, and I am yet to hear he has any problems, perhaps he can confirm. Finally, don't get me wrong, but the pommies aren't exactly as upto date with GTR as AU are they??, and their not the most talented when it comes to engineering, tuning either...

I hope I am wrong (or rather what I read was wrong) because I will be getting a pair of these turbos if they are as durable as HKS/Garett etc, they clearly make great power. The thread that put me off is:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/showthre...ead.php?t=21242

Its worth a read - UK may be behind us but theyve been using these trust turbos for a while.

Jeremy

Congrats on the results!! sounds like a very nice package :(

As for the turbo's longevity, i've never heard of anyone out here having trouble with them at all. Pete at advan backs them to the hilt, reckons they're the best bolt on low mounts along with 2530's.

It's funny there not having that problem in japan. Maybe they don't like english weather haha :headspin:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...