Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just started my RB26/30 build and i'm looking for advice if its worthwhile enlarging the sump and adding the rear head drain.

The engine is primarily a street engine with very occasional 1/4 mile and track use. I plan to limit the revs to 8250-8500rpm. I already have sump baffles, oil restrictor and a N1 oil pump, and a large oil cooler. I was going to add the sump and head drain but now i think the money could be best spent on other things.....HELP

For the $300 or thereabouts the rear head drain will cost why not? If that was the one thing that prevented your engine spinning a bearing would the $300 be well spent? Shit yes!

With the sump, cheapest you'll get out of it is about $800 for a "proper" extension. Again, a small price to pay compared to the price of rebuilding an engine!

Preventative measures (as opposed to performance boosting mods) are a bit like car insurance, you hope to never have to use it but FK you're glad you had it when shit turns bad!

Money spent on oil system is never wasted. I smashed my N1 pump first time I drifted my RB30/26.

I made my own head drain from 1inch bsb brass pipe fittings (local hardware store, just needed to borrow a tap to thread the head) and 1inch ID red oil line. And upgraded to a Tomei pump (removed one spring to get pressure back to normalish for street). Welded a return into the home made sump and never had another oil warning light again.

Pretty much, everyone ops to go the tomei, greddy, nitto pumps for stronger materials that are used while building these pumps which are stronger then the n1 pumps that are always breaking, on idle and under heavy loads,

I went straight to a nitto pump as I didn't wanna risk breaking a n1 pump and rebuilding my motor again

N1 pumps don't just 'break', more than enough info on the pages of this forum to work that out.

I've run them for 7 years on 3 motors, never broken one and i bash the limiters in them without fear.

Mine "just broke" so I disagree.

And I NEVER limiter bash. My engine had only done about 15,000kms with that pump in it before it went. It had never been on a track and only the odd caning (so I'm told!).

You obviously got lucky. There is some sort of issue with them be it the quality of the material or a flaw in the casting that makes them weak.

There's no way I'd risk a standard N1 pump again, it's not worth it. This time I've gone N1 pump with Reimax gears so fingers crossed......

Mine "just broke" so I disagree.

And I NEVER limiter bash. My engine had only done about 15,000kms with that pump in it before it went. It had never been on a track and only the odd caning (so I'm told!).

You obviously got lucky. There is some sort of issue with them be it the quality of the material or a flaw in the casting that makes them weak.

There's no way I'd risk a standard N1 pump again, it's not worth it. This time I've gone N1 pump with Reimax gears so fingers crossed......

(so you were told), that sums that up - you don't even know!

I didn't get lucky, 60,000kms over the 3 motors says so.

And then what about the rest of the motor? Did you have it checked or just blame the pump?

Was properly balanced? Crank snout and engagement 100%?

Sounds like you don't know that either - so how you can say it "just broke" is... interesting. :)

Ok legend, while there is validity in some of what you say, you need to learn that just becase something hasn't happened to you, doesn't mean it doesn't happen! Whenever someone theorises an issue you have a tendency to ridicule them because "I've..never broken one" etc, etc.

The engine in my car was already built so no, I don't know exactly what was done. It was built by a reputable engine builder/tuner in Brisbane so I can only presume it was done correctly.

I also like how you make your own legendary presumptions- "And then what about the rest of the motor? Did you have it checked or just blame the pump?

Was properly balanced? Crank snout and engagement 100%?

Sounds like you don't know that either - so how you can say it "just broke" is... interesting."

I could go on but it seems it would be a waste of time. You're the "most viewed admin of all time" so clearly the oracle of the RB. :action-smiley-069:

The problem is the harmonics of the stock 30 crank during fast changing from low to high revs, a billet crank is supposed to be better and will take more revs without trying to lunch the pump.

From what I understand a stock balanced crank will be fine with a Tomei pump up to around 7500rpm on a fast reving motor, over 7500 is possible but you are getting over the happy zone, apparently a billet crank can take alot more abuse, how much I dont know but Ive "heard" of 30's being reved to around 10 with one, fact or fiction, I dont know.

I have a 25/30 with a Tomei pump, limited to 7500, I shift at around 7200 though as this keeps me in the sweet torque range and limits the abuse, I donot race for sheep stations so reving beyond that on a stock (albeit balanced) crank is something that does not interest me.

Ok legend, while there is validity in some of what you say, you need to learn that just becase something hasn't happened to you, doesn't mean it doesn't happen! Whenever someone theorises an issue you have a tendency to ridicule them because "I've..never broken one" etc, etc.

The engine in my car was already built so no, I don't know exactly what was done. It was built by a reputable engine builder/tuner in Brisbane so I can only presume it was done correctly.

I also like how you make your own legendary presumptions- "And then what about the rest of the motor? Did you have it checked or just blame the pump?

Was properly balanced? Crank snout and engagement 100%?

Sounds like you don't know that either - so how you can say it "just broke" is... interesting."

I could go on but it seems it would be a waste of time. You're the "most viewed admin of all time" so clearly the oracle of the RB. :action-smiley-069:

Of course there is validity - I wouldn't be saying it if it wasn't there.

Because a pump fails - does not mean it's the actual pumps fault. Think a bit bigger than what you see before you. It's like saying it's a tyres fault for blowing out, but the actual cause was a nail that deflated it, leading to a blow out.

Given you have no idea of the motor build and it's treatment before you got it, sounds like you didn't have it properly inspected afterwards... And as a result cant confirm with any reasonable certainty there is nothing else at play here - you cannot for a second say it's exclusively the pumps fault. The entire design is flawed, hence the Tomei is the "best" solution on a budget... EVen then you can even kill a Tomei pump if you try hard enough or the build overall is poor (users have here before).

Yes to the bigger sump. There is no evidence that the "head drain" actually does anything. If you are still at the building stage drill out and relieve the oil returns and drill and tap one or more holes as high as possible for sump breathers (running to a catch can, not the head. 8,500 is a lot for an RB30 - they can be made to rev to 10,000 but even at 8500 you will need a quality damper and everything well blueprinted and balanced.

N1 pumps don't just 'break', more than enough info on the pages of this forum to work that out.

I've run them for 7 years on 3 motors, never broken one and i bash the limiters in them without fear.

Have you looked at the inside of one?

Compare it to the inside of a brand name upgrade... its very easy to see why they "Just break."

When an engine that normaly rev's underload from 3000 to 7000 rpm in a few seconds suddenly does it in one second but still moves the same thickness and volume of oil with the same thin cogs that a stock oil pump has (N1 or not). Having the right oil restrictions to the head is always a very important thing and enlarging oil return paths is definatly going to lessen the requirement of a head oil drain.... However if you look at the budgetless big race RB's in Japan you'll see many combos of oil drain and even bigger pumping systems. I'm yet to see a pro car with a stock or N1 pump.

This is a street engine, its not going to be a 1000hp pro car. I have read that running a crank case evac system is more benifical than a head drain ( which seems to be fashionable these days ). I understand that N1 pumps are a O.E mass cast item but if the weak point is the gears then a crank collar and billet gears should fix or lesson the chance of breakage. i will also drill tha pan to allow oil to drain back to the pick up area

Crank collar and billet gears will definately help, mandatory as your car is a 32 with no doubt a short snout crank drive.

I would highly recommend getting the collar custom made or at least try to get one that is matched to your pump. Every 26 crank snout I have seen has wear on the leading and trailing edge of the drive suggesting that there is clearance between the snout and the pump drive. No doubt with the harmonics causing a "rattling effect" of the pump on the drive this speeds up the wear on both the drive and the pump.

interesting shoota_77 i was thinking all off the shelf parts are the same, but having one machined to suit my specific parts makes sense. Do you have any recomendations on how to use? i'm located in W.A but i can freight my parts through work if needed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
    • There are guys on Facebook under, Infiniti Owners Australia   https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1Z3RbPqx4k/?mibextid=wwXIfr What Whp are you after and I can help, and join this Q group in the states. https://www.facebook.com/share/g/19A59cN3JR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • Does any of you guys have instagram pages for your builds? Keen to see some Aussie builds. I still can't figure out how to post photos in here.
×
×
  • Create New...