Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, most of the issues should be resolved.

The search index is being rebuilt as I write this, so it wont be 100% back to normal for about an hour.

If you guys have any more issues from now on, can you show me examples (if there are any.)

Thanks guys, my apologies - the migration was rushed to minimise downtime.

How do you smell? Terrible??? :D

Haven't been able to upload decent sized pics for a while now and it is still happening.

Files of only a few KB seem to work but nothing 1mb or close to 2mb works.

Either get an "Upload Skipped (Error IO)" or this: post-78856-0-09295400-1364381321_thumb.jpg

  On 27/03/2013 at 10:49 AM, Not a Pulsar said:

How do you smell? Terrible??? :D

Haven't been able to upload decent sized pics for a while now and it is still happening.

Files of only a few KB seem to work but nothing 1mb or close to 2mb works.

Either get an "Upload Skipped (Error IO)" or this: attachicon.gifError.JPG

Best joke ever!

Hmm, ok, what skin are you using? I just uploaded a 1.3mb image using the Deluxe skin without problem.

  On 27/03/2013 at 11:02 AM, r32-25t said:

Hey mate we still don't have the mobile version with the white background

Ok, will check this out.

  On 27/03/2013 at 11:35 AM, PranK said:

Best joke ever! Hmm, ok, what skin are you using? I just uploaded a 1.3mb image using the Deluxe skin without problem. Ok, will check this out.

innovation of course.

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 27/03/2013 at 10:49 AM, Not a Pulsar said:

How do you smell? Terrible??? :D

Haven't been able to upload decent sized pics for a while now and it is still happening.

Files of only a few KB seem to work but nothing 1mb or close to 2mb works.

Either get an "Upload Skipped (Error IO)" or this: attachicon.gifError.JPG

  On 27/03/2013 at 11:35 AM, PranK said:

Best joke ever!

Hmm, ok, what skin are you using? I just uploaded a 1.3mb image using the Deluxe skin without problem.

Ok, will check this out.

This is still an issue ^^^

I have had 1.6mb pics work and 400kb pics fail. Mostly fail. :(

I tried different skins too. If I try to upload multiple pics, I will get maybe 5 out of 7 failing.

  • 3 months later...

Still having issues with uploading pics... Upload Skipped Error403. or sometimes a script timeout.

Keep getting this Cloudfare thingo too where you have to type the weird words to prove you are a human.

Happens sometimes when posting or changing profile details etc...

I would put up a pic of it but well... Upload issue. :( I did try.

Win XP, IE8, Innovation.

*Edit Just had to prove humanness to post this. LOL

Always get it on my phone..

I know if it takes too long that means the post has gone through, then I just press back or go to another page. ;)

Keeps me from double posting for now.

Edit:

Sorry, just noticed about pictures as well.

I am using photobucket and it WAS working fine uploading the picture straight to the post, but then now I can't seem to find that code to 'copy&paste'

It just comes up with a link to the photobucket website.

Edited by Zrobe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
  • Create New...