Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Giving the compound movements a go now. With issues I still have, starting out light.

Very short rests 30sec between everything (inc movements).Got my heart rate right up , feel very sore in the legs today.

Squats

10 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

Bench

12 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

Pendlay Rows

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

5 x 90kg

Try standing on one leg with your eyes open, then try it with your eyes shut. You will feel the stabilising muscles trying to compensate . its the connection with the muscles that I am trying to fast track a bit.

I am just getting back into squats so I can concentrate on the muscle engagement . try it out with a light weight or no weight.see what you think.

I have been doing this with a few movementsjust hadn't mentioned it before.

Edited by rev210

Cool, I assumed it was something like that. My issue is that I can't feel when I'm out of alignment, unbalanced etc. I have to use my sight. As I can't see when bench pressing, I have to get birds to straighten my position on the bench; what I feel as straight is apparently very crooked

What it does is cause you to force stabilisation muscles to work harder.

You 'wobble' as one balance mechanisim is switched off(sight) and inner ear and muscles take up the slack. Feeling into the control of the muscles takes time, till then stabilisers get a workout. You aren't going for heavy with this training.its training proprioceptive.

Ages ago when starting out I use something to obscure the vision working up to eyes closed.mostly its because you get distracted more by noises and things initially.

I used to train at a gym where there was a blind guy. Very strong dude, he was blind from birth. Trained alone,no spotter. Perfect form

Edited by rev210
  • Like 1

I've found similar things when squatting in racks with mirrors vs squatting without.

My gym has their racks in front of their full length wall mirror and it was only when I trained at a gym with no mirrors that I realised how much I relied on sight for my squatting form. It felt weird at first and I thought my form would be worse, but I ended up lifting more weight with better feeling form, instantly. Felt better in tune with my body; could actually feel the whole motion. Upon returning to my gym I achieved a similar thing by squatting and forcing my eyes out of focus so that I couldn't see my reflection easily. I've since trained my form up to a point where I can look at the mirror and not throw my form off.

Related: there is a belief I read about not long ago that most men at 6ft and above (and not overweight) already possess the muscular strength for a vertical leap to dunk a basketball, but the muscles simply do not work together in perfect synergy and timing until you've trained them with a lot of jumping exercises. Basically, you can squat all you like and this will of course help your vertical leap through explosive strength, but if you don't actually jump and train the muscles to work together it severely limits your potential in the vertical. I don't know about the dunking a ball part, but certainly your vertical leap increases dramatically with jump exercises before you've even gained extra strength in the legs.

One armarm dumbell rows (fatgripz)

50kg x 8,8,8,5,5

Dumbell Rear delt raises (incline bench , fatgripz)

22kg x 15

32.5kg x 8,8,8

Grip hold from rack (overhand grip , fat grips)

150kg

200kg

Triceps cable pushdown (latpulldown machine)

72kg 8,8,8,8,5

Squats . Trying to get low bar form right so dropped the weight to nanna level

10 x 70kg

5 x 80kg

5 x 80kg

5 x 80kg

5 x 80kg

Bench (paused) Taking it easy

97.5kg 5,5,5,5,4

80kg x 15 (fast)

Pendlay Rows

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 100kg

5 x 110kg

  • 3 months later...

haven't checked in for a bit. Bodyweight sitting on about 100kg now. Probably no real change in % fat. Just eating a little more to accomodate the gym 3-4 times a week.

Been doing very basic movements mostly focused on upper back and shoulder health. Not really training intensely . Been taking it easy.

My shoulders & back have grown a bit and caused wardrobe stress. my tailored business shirts are a tad tight now. Not training legs yet... but, scary times ahead for the scales as I am about to ha ha...

Edited by rev210

workout today. ( typical of what I do every week).

100 Cal warmup on bike.

I do all of the movements below with the blue fatgripz inc. pullups (makes the bar 2.5 inches thick - harder to hold onto).

* Cable row machine - narrow grip. (all the weight stack). Done fast /explosively

- 20 /12 /12

* Pull up knee raise combo . Basically a pullup (strict) with a knee to elbow movement at the top. Lower knees , then lower body in slow controlled manner . then repeat.

- 15 /10 / 10

* One Arm rows . 50kg dumbell

- 12 /12/ 12

* Barbell Pendlay rows 100kg

- 10 /10 /8

* Barbell Grip holds (till failure) . standard overhand grip

- 180kg

- 140kg

- 100kg

100 Cal on Bike to finish.

  • Like 1

My shoulders & back have grown a bit and caused wardrobe stress. my tailored business shirts are a tad tight now. Not training legs yet... but, scary times ahead for the scales as I am about to ha ha...

Know that feeling, I've gone up a whole size and I also can't wear anything tight or dresses with zips at the back as they don't do up; so the majority of my wardrobe is now unwearable. I've bought bigger jeans and a few dresses to get me by Wah

Know that feeling, I've gone up a whole size and I also can't wear anything tight or dresses with zips at the back as they don't do up; so the majority of my wardrobe is now unwearable. I've bought bigger jeans and a few dresses to get me by Wah

The positive side is you probably look even more fantastic than before , so any new wardrobe additions will be icing on the cake for you. Just a bummer that the process costs money.

Living in a colder state , you probably need more winter gear too. Melbourne at least has no shortage of good places to buy clothes so at least you are in the right location

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...