Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I should have joined here sooner so I could bug you to post Reference images :D

I've been working on this for a while, infact I started it in 2006 but put it on hold when things got too busy.

I recently picked it up again and gave it an overhaul to make it fit for GTAIV - It was for GTA:San Andreas initialy so it had much less detail.

Currently there are many issues to resolve (it never ends with GTA modding)

The issue that bothers me most is the wiper pattern when the windsheild acumulates dirt overtime, but thats pretty easy to fix.

I have many plans for this car including to eventually release it. It still needs an engine bay, underside and other detailings.

I would gladly accept any offers for detail photos from members to help me finish this.

Anyway, heres some screenshots and a Fraps video on youtube if your interested.

sky_orange_01.jpg

sky_blk_01.jpg

sky_yellow_01.jpg

video:

Cheers,

herc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417924-skyline-c210-gta-iv-mod/
Share on other sites

That's done good work!

Since most of the detail had been completed, hopefully it's an easy conversion into GTA 5.

How's the damage effect on custom cars? Does it use a generic method or do you need to play around with that as well?

Thanks Eli,

Yeah from what I've seen GTAV looks to be just an expansion on their current technology, which is pretty common and follows the trend of GTA3 with vice and San andreas. Usually there are a few minor improvements here and there.

Infact you will find files from GTA3 in the GTA4 archives, even lots of files that aren't even used. One that was left in, but looked like it was modified for testing with GTAIV was the Carmods.dat file which had all the universal car mod parts that was used in GTA:SA. Im suspecting that they had bigger plans for GTAIV but decided to release what they had and wait for GTAIV for extra features.

As far as damage system goes, its much more advanced than the previous GTA's which used to swap pannels out with a damaged one when a collision too place. In GTAIV, the speed, angle and location all factor into collisions so they are somewhat dynamic. Some vehicles are more rigid, and some are crumple like tinfoil. The setup is quite advanced and requires a lot of work to get right. Most GTAIV car mods cut corners and dont have things like, dirt, breakable lights, working indicators etc. I think it makes a big differnce in terms of getting it to blend with the game instead of standing out from all other cars.

Ive experimented with increasing damage multipliers, and its pretty halarious when you turn it right up. If you hit a curb half you car would cave in and the front wheel gets jammed somewhere in the engine bay.

Anyway, can't wait for GTAV for PC, who knows when they will release that. Once they've made their money from console sales they tend to release it around a year later.

I have the C210s rival, the Toyota Mark II '78 in the works too :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No intention of driving the car the way it's set up now, just wanting to make sure I haven't made any mistakes along the way so that the tune can go smoothly, I don't want to waste anyone's time with stupid issues. And of course I intend to get it towed to the dyno in a completed state 😅 I have the base fuel pressure with the vacuum disconnected set at about 40psi, which I believe is at least relatively close to stock fuel pressure, maybe I'll have a fiddle with the reg and see what happens. For all I know I could be wasting my time with this and I should just plumb it in and see what the tuner reckons. I just find it a bit strange that it seems to be under so much load just free revving, but maybe that's just a result of the turbo slowing down the exhaust gasses and making a restriction in the flow, with no boost to compensate.
    • The boy just hit up google translate and it worked a treat, he said step one was "please urinate with precision and elegance", he then sent me the correct translation  I get some new loctite for the small fixtures tomorrow and get some "dort" going after that 🤣
    • Right, so is the fuel pressure the same as it was previously? If not, well, it's not going to work well. I can understand the theory I assume you are going for, which is: "Run it N/A, and if I have the original AFM, and same amount of fuel and intake air as previously, the fact there's a turbo in my exhaust should still make it run" Which it... might? Provided you don't actually change how much air or fuel is going into the car.. or getting out. But if you have changed that, all bets are off. What is the purpose to even have the car run this way? To get it to a tuner? And if the goal is to limp it to a tuner, you're still going to what - plumb up a whole intercooler system and new intake in the parking lot out front before your tune......?
    • Haha yea it's a bit of a weird setup at the moment, just wanted to make sure I sorted out any headaches before dyno day. At the moment I've changed the exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe, 460lph fuel pump and rising rate reg as well as the previously mentioned headstuds and gasket. The nistune was already mapped for the car as it was and drove around for a few months no worries. The plan is to run flex fuel hence the big pump, which I've wired direct to the battery through a relay to avoid voltage issues.
    • Um. Was the ECU the same as the one previously there? I know R33's needed R32 GTST ECU's or other tomfoolery to run Nistune. This is such a wild setup. Most people would plumb in the turbo then not drive the car (i.e tow it to a tuner). What's actually changed since it last ran?
×
×
  • Create New...