Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, start with the basics;

- RB20DET

- Kando TD05-18G

- Aftermarket Pump (unsure of brand, already in car)

- Nismo 555cc Injectors (to suit RB26 with resistor pack)

- Nistune

Let me begin with, when I initially got the car tune with Toshi, at idle on the wide band car registered 10-11 AFR's. Light throttle would see lean 15-17 AFR's but under full throttle and boost would stay at 10.8-11.3. This was with the TD06-20G I had. Mid throttle sees 13.9-15.5...

So since replacing the TD06 with a TD05 Toshi tried to set the AFR at idle to as close to stoic as possible.

With as much adjusting on the nistune, second time around, car shows 11.9-12.6 on Idle, but now has a tendency to stall after approx 10-20 seconds of idling. It can happen 8 out of 10 idle's, or not happen at all. Still has the light throttle leaness and AFR's on full boost remain the same. I run a AEM wideband also.. When it goes to stall, sometimes if I blip the throttle it'll idle, other times it will want to stall again..

Now I've tested the car with these (individually) disconnected to little to no change;

- disconnect TPS

- disconnect AAC

- disconnect O2 sensor

Car runs no BOV, with a plate made up to block where the factory one lives. And has never run a BOV since owning the car. Car retains the factory AFM.

Injectors were bought second hand. Toshi has suggested putting the stock BOV back on, I'm comtemplating doing this and maybe a AAC clean.

Open to ideas/suggestions/theories...

Kane

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417992-rb20-idle-expertise-required/
Share on other sites

So basically trying to diagnose the stalling and lean conditions. According to Toshi, its set up for closed loop on Idle and under 0psi, open loop once in boost, so dont understand how its lean with the fuel map how it is :(

I don't understand. You claim idle AFR is about 12 in one sentence (rich) and claim that it is lean elsewhere.

Idle: 10-11 (too rich)

Light Throttle: 15-17 (too lean)

Full Throttle: 10.8-11.3 (very safe haha)

Sometimes on idle the AEM shows 17+ AFR and engine wants to stall. It doesnt seem to maintain stoich levels on idle or cruise... So I'm wondering if one (or more) injectors could be the issue? Or something else?

Edited by Kane_R32
  • 3 weeks later...

Just some feedback;

I removed and thoroughly cleaned and reset the IAC to no avail.

I have noticed that when pulling the throttle with the IAC connected the car goes "lean" and splutters..

If during the light throttle I disconnect the IAC, car comes good and doesnt splutter.

Does this sound like my IAC will need to be replaced since I've already cleaned it and tried to reset? Though the slight lean spot on light throttle when being driven is present on the wideband..?

  • 1 month later...

*sigh*

Heres the scenario at the moment.

Car while driving, any gear, any RPM and any speed, from say 2%-25% throttle will show lean on my wideband 16.0+ AFR.. Then when you push the throttle past say 1/4 throttle, it will go into 13-15.0 AFR and obviously rich conditions when WOT.

Also when coming to a stop (idle), the car will idle fine for 20-30 seconds, and then the wideband shows it going anywhere from (11.2-15.7 and then to 16.0+ AFR again, this time causing the car to stall. Bliping the throttle stops brings the revs back up, but again 20-30 seconds after, same scenario.

Car has been checked over and over for vacuum leaks. O2/IAC/TPS have also been disconnected individually to no change.

I'm wondering if my Nismo 555cc injectors have a issue? Car shows 40psi fuel pressure +/- 1-2psi on idle. (and doesnt drop off during the lean condition at idle).

Stock BOV/Stock AFM.

Ps - Can feel this lean spot while driving 2-25% throttle.

Car with TD06 + stock injectors + stock ecu idled fine. (no wideband to tell)

Car with TD06 + Nismos + Nistune idled fine (tune/untuned - no wideband)

Car with TD05 + Nismos + Nistune doesnt like to idle (tuned / with wideband)

With the info above, you would think it's possible Nistune/Tune related right?

It should not be able to go lean at <25% throttle light load because it should be in closed loop and should command 14.7:1. The only way it could do it is if the O2 feedback has been switched off and the maps set that lean in that area. In which case it would be like that all the time, not just start out of the blue.

It is possible that something as simple as a coolant temperature sensor might have failed. That's one of the inputs that determines when and where closed loop is allowed. Do you have Nistune software? If you do, you should drive around with it hooked up and see what you see. It might jump out at you.

You might be onto something.

Because I was originally seeing sub 11.0 AFR on idle with the TD06, he turned off O2 feedback and tried to adust/lean it out, with no result.

I think the cleaning of my AAC and any leaks has solved my rich idke issue, and I may need to have the feedback turned back on...

Hmmm. No Nistune software..

Appreciate the help man! :)

  • 3 weeks later...

Went and saw Toshi, 02 feedback wasnt switched off. We did find a couple air leaks which have now been sorted, yet it still does the same thing.

Starting to wonder if my Nismo 555cc injectors have an issue.

He did mention the AFM voltage is a little low at idle... but shouldnt cause too much concern

  • 2 years later...

I have similar problems with nistune, I figured it was the factory O2 causing the problems. Can be from 12-16afr's on idle while sometimes perfect at 14.7. Can be lean entering boost 13's but drops to 11.3 afr's at 15lbs and holds afr's there.

Makes sense that it would be O2 or IAC.

if you've swap the AFM with the Nistune, and done all that rescale business make sure you change the values to the AFM Low Voltage enrichment, a few cars I've tuned needed this changed as once the car idles the ecu starts dumping in fuel and then the o2 feedback tries to correct it causing awesome hunting

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...