Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hahahahah, what a bunch of tryhard jokes, painful to go through them to see if anyone actually knew the answer but of course they did not. Interesting question, politicians would not write them though so that answer is wrong. I'd guess that an engineer, the Transport and Police mobs would be involved. Perhaps when the juveniles go back to school someone who actually knows something will respond.

Seems like a try hard answer...

Your guessing.. So you don't know either.. Thanks for your reply

This

I love to drop the creater of all these stupid laws a interesting email.

Go for it.... some reading for you.

http://www.rta.nsw.g..._standards.html

http://www.rta.nsw.g...rn-creek-qa.pdf

And in answer to your question - it will be a specific policy unit within the RTA.

To make it clearer- its not the police, and its not the politicians themselves. The Laws would be drawn up by the dept, for submission.

Maybe you should "right" a letter to your local state member of parliament outlining your concerns, and post it off. After you could find a exposed bit of hill on a windy day, face the wind and urinate.

If I was limited to one guess I'd say, "Pedestrians"

jk

LOL Terry, that was my first thought too! That 'lil know secret society responsible for the demerit point system AND double demerit weekends, namely, The Pedestrian Association of Australia.

Hahahahah, what a bunch of tryhard jokes, painful to go through them to see if anyone actually knew the answer but of course they did not. Interesting question, politicians would not write them though so that answer is wrong. I'd guess that an engineer, the Transport and Police mobs would be involved. Perhaps when the juveniles go back to school someone who actually knows something will respond.

Well, we know it wasn't Queensland that led the way, your regulations can be so backward that they were probably written by juveniles on school holidays!!!

My best guess would be a group of engineers, in collaboration with the rms(formally rta).

in relation to atmo bovs.

1, would be primarily noise.

2, being part of the intake system, on the pressure side, after the turbo, this is also after the pcv, which vents oil/fuel vapour from the sump.

this contains unburnt hydrocarbons, which are a form of pollution.

might be very small, but it all adds up.

This is the very same reason you have a charcoal canister and fuel tanks are no longer vented.

Oh, we also don't have it as bad as other states.

eg, afaik, Vic, can't get non af metered cars passed engineering.

Qld, illegal to have ANY nitrous components in the car, NSW, allowed so long as disconnected.

  • 1 month later...

Yes it's sternly worded because I'm serious. i was defected and I don't care what laws there is my car was safe 100% all I don't agree with those dickhead with the wheels hanging out the front like a go cart now that's just silly.

Not too late to set up a political party.

Better than watching pollies kissing babies for another 6 months.

And may I take a stab at the fact that there are more motoring enthusiasts than shooters.

  • 1 month later...

Is that what I've been doing wrong!?

Any other tips?

you need rock hard suspension for less body roll.

and a massive cannon so pedestrians can hear you coming.

*sarcasm for those who cant tell*

Laws are written by the We Want Your Money department.

Only have a small amount to do with actual road safety.

In NSW, get done for 2 defects, get fined more than if low range DUI.

Absolutely no logic there.

We, boys and girls, are what is called a soft target.

It will only get worse until we are all driving beige Camrys.

Witness the new Qld laws.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...