Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm curious to know with these cars which things can make a vast or not so vast improvement in the way of handling and balance, that doesnt cost a couple week's paycheck.

I'll try and list all the things it currently has upgraded..

18X9 +23 all round

235/40 Kumho KU31 front

265/35 Federal RSR rear

Front strut brace

BC BR Coilovers (8 and 6kg)

27mm whiteline front swaybar

Nismo castor arms

Shimmed diff (Pretty much locked)

Aftermarket rear lower control arms

HICAS lock bar

Aluminium subframe bushes

Relocate spare wheel and jack to shed

I'm thinking maybe a bit more neg camber on the front could help, but what do i know, lol.

Can any of the guru's out there recommend some things worth upgrading (that are good bang for buck) that might get this barge of a car faster lap times?

Thanks.

Tyres mate.

There are a whole heap of things on there that make much less difference than a good set of tyres. ANd doing track work, or even worse making setup changes, with road tyres on the track is just chasing a problem that may not exist.

There are a brilliant handling car out of the box (tyring tracking something else like a commodore or wrx that is pretty standard and you will feel the difference!)

The setup I used on my GTST (1.10s at Wakefield park) were:

bleed valve, 12psi boost, 160rwkw

lower springs

tight mechancial diff

whiteline sway bars

235 front 265 rear semi slicks

If you are on a budget (like most people), try Federal FZ201 tyres, they are great in the dry and very cheap. Otherwise I'd go Kumho V70a, or maybe Toyo 888 (but skylines can be a ltitle heavy). If you want the best at any price go for Dunlop Dz03, Yoko A050 or the Hankooks, but be ready to pay $500+ per tyre.

BTW you can get second hand slicks or semi slicks but they are a real gamble on quality...generally they are cheap because they are past their best, but sometimes there are bargains

I would have thought that a 265 is a bit too wide on a 9" rim, and 235 is a bit narrow.

Also, try a heavier rear bar. Run higher air pressure in the front tyres.

Are the coilovers adjustable for ride height? If so, have you had the car corner weighted?

On a different tack, upgrade the brakes to use braided lines, fit some good pads and slotted rotors (if you haven't already).

Agreed, I'm thinking that as well, pretty hefty front is there is nothing in the rear.

And in terms of handling/balance - what are the issues you are currently having? It's too taily happy? Front understeer or doesn't respond too well?

Also agree RE: Tyres. KU31's are terrible... I have them on the front of my Commodore lol, I wouldn't put them on a car that I actually wanted to handle properly.

If you complimented the front with RS-Rs to match the rear you'd notice a major improvement there for sure.

There is also the cheap Achillies semi on the market at the moment that is around $200 a tyre in a 265/18 - They are starting to get a reasonable reputation for the people on a tight budget.

I couldn't out drive my KU36's at the track the other day but for the money I'm going to try Achillies next time. Seem too be pretty good.

As the other guys have said, I'd be changing to some better tyres 1st and then looking at maybe a bigger rear sway bar?

Woops I meant KU36's on the front.

Tyres mate.

There are a whole heap of things on there that make much less difference than a good set of tyres. ANd doing track work, or even worse making setup changes, with road tyres on the track is just chasing a problem that may not exist.

There are a brilliant handling car out of the box (tyring tracking something else like a commodore or wrx that is pretty standard and you will feel the difference!)

The setup I used on my GTST (1.10s at Wakefield park) were:

bleed valve, 12psi boost, 160rwkw

lower springs

tight mechancial diff

whiteline sway bars

235 front 265 rear semi slicks

If you are on a budget (like most people), try Federal FZ201 tyres, they are great in the dry and very cheap. Otherwise I'd go Kumho V70a, or maybe Toyo 888 (but skylines can be a ltitle heavy). If you want the best at any price go for Dunlop Dz03, Yoko A050 or the Hankooks, but be ready to pay $500+ per tyre.

BTW you can get second hand slicks or semi slicks but they are a real gamble on quality...generally they are cheap because they are past their best, but sometimes there are bargains

Thanks for that. When funds permit i shall be on the lookout for some proper semi's, though maybe not the Dunlops or Yoko's, those prices just scare me, lol.

I would have thought that a 265 is a bit too wide on a 9" rim, and 235 is a bit narrow.

Also, try a heavier rear bar. Run higher air pressure in the front tyres.

Are the coilovers adjustable for ride height? If so, have you had the car corner weighted?

On a different tack, upgrade the brakes to use braided lines, fit some good pads and slotted rotors (if you haven't already).

I think so too, a 245 front and 255 would be ideal for me.

What sort of air pressures are best? Or is it a case of dialing it in for each car.

Yep, height/damper and springs are adjustable, havent had it corner weighted (only found out about that last night actually).

Waiting to be installed are some front slotted DBA rotors with PMU HC+ pads, and fresh rear standard rotors with PMU B-spec pads. Aswell as some braided brake lines and RBF660 fluid.

27mm front bar with no rear upgrade should make it it bit "interesting" to drive.

I think i read somewhere that with a GTS-t, to upgrade the front swaybar and leave the rear, apparently inducing understeer.

There was a Whiteline swaybar group-buy at the time, lol.

Agreed, I'm thinking that as well, pretty hefty front is there is nothing in the rear.

And in terms of handling/balance - what are the issues you are currently having? It's too taily happy? Front understeer or doesn't respond too well?

Also agree RE: Tyres. KU31's are terrible... I have them on the front of my Commodore lol, I wouldn't put them on a car that I actually wanted to handle properly.

If you complimented the front with RS-Rs to match the rear you'd notice a major improvement there for sure.

There is also the cheap Achillies semi on the market at the moment that is around $200 a tyre in a 265/18 - They are starting to get a reasonable reputation for the people on a tight budget.

Not exactly getting any dramas with the car. I probably wasnt pushing it hard enough at the track day i went to (had some Achillies ATR sport tyres on at the time and was getting brake fade). So wasnt super confident + being my first time on Barbagello at night time.

That is the Achillies 123 tyre is it? I also heard they are good, that they just dont last as long as the others.

I think i read somewhere that with a GTS-t, to upgrade the front swaybar and leave the rear, apparently inducing understeer.

There was a Whiteline swaybar group-buy at the time, lol.

Yuh. More roll stiffness at the front moves the grip to the rear. If you like it safe, then understeer is the safest characteristic to build into a car's handling. But I hate understeer. Hate it hate it hate it. If I have to leave the road, I'm happier doing so facing backwards. Less chance of a neck injury. /jokes.

But anyway, it's not sensible to put a massively stiff front bar on (like your 27mm) without upgrading the rear too. You'd want at least the 24m adjustable on the rear to balance that stiff front bar.

Yep, with 8kg front/6kg rear you'd want a 22 adjustable to match the 27mm fixed. Will make a massive difference to handling.

You'll want the adjustable version to fine tune the balance.

What rims are those? I'm interested as 9" +23 sounds like a good fitment. I'm surprised that 265/35 fit with +23.

Edited by simpletool

Yep, with 8kg front/6kg rear you'd want a 22 adjustable to match the 27mm fixed. Will make a massive difference to handling.

You'll want the adjustable version to fine tune the balance.

+1 adjustable rear sway bar is definitely the first thing to do. Second would be front tyres, unless they've got some meat on them and you want to get some value out of them. KU36s should be ok, but not as grippy as RSRs.

Yep, with 8kg front/6kg rear you'd want a 22 adjustable to match the 27mm fixed. Will make a massive difference to handling.

You'll want the adjustable version to fine tune the balance.

What rims are those? I'm interested as 9" +23 sounds like a good fitment. I'm surprised that 265/35 fit with +23.

Looks like a rear swaybar is on the list then :) They are blitz type 01 and yes, perfect fitment if you ask me. I was worried aswell about the 265. Wouldnt want anything wider but it even with minimal camber they dont touch anything.

Got any pics of fitment?

and +1 to better front tyres. It's good to use the same tyres all around.

BTW. I chose the 22mm adjustable rear based on % increase over stock. It should be right, and you can adjust to equivalent of 21, 22, 23mm (approximately).

  • 1 month later...

Over the last few years we've taken an essentially stock R33 GTST to Winton and gradually upgraded it, noting the laptime benefits of each upgrade.

We reduced the weight significantly, (probably around 200kgs removed), ran the same boost pressure and stock brake system during this period. We also installed a VideoVBOX system to properly understand what was happening.

Whilst this car had previously had Tein Street Springs installed it still had some pretty rubbish standard shocks. So no coil-overs...

Biggest 'feel' benefit was a proper fixed back race seat. Not a lot of lap time here, but major gains to help learn what the car was doing.

Sway bars: -2.1" per lap

Whiteline Blade Adjustable, as most people attest, gave a massive laptime improvement on the same rubber.

Brake reconditioning: -2.8" per lap

Still the stock brake rotors, re-machined, Ferodo pads, Dot 5 fluid and new seals all-round.

Semi-Slicks (Toyo R888's) -5.58" per lap

We also shimmed up the diff a little before bolting these tyres on so it's difficult to tell how much of which was of benefit, but I can tell you the diff shims were very cheap and the tyres, not so much!

There's a million other little upgrades on there, like a HICAS lockbar and undertray, rear wing, but there's no way for us to directly prove the benefits using the data... and asides from the lockbar they aren't 'suspension' related.

We will have BC ER Coilovers on soon, but also a completely new RB30DET good for well over 500bhp and a roll cage, so it won't be a fair comparison. But I hope this helps.

Some more details on the project including on-boards etc here:

http://droppingthehammer.wordpress.com/

Best of luck, hope to see you there soon.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...