Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 7/18/2018 at 5:58 AM, Duncan said:

even with current (global)/ upcoming (oz) leaf, I am not at all convinced that larger batteries are the only way to go.  In my opinion buyers who think properly about it should be able to choose say a 24kwh battery for 25k instead of a 40kwh one for 40k. 24kwh has been plenty for day to day use in the city, and conversely 40kwh isn't enough for all of the longer distances uses we would need so it is just a more expensive in between option.  You only ever need enough juice for your regular daily use so you can charge overnight, there is nothing gained by dragging around a battery that gives you say 3 days between charges....

I'm totally down with this.

As soon as it's viable, we want to get rid of our HiLux work ute and replace it with an EV ute. The work ute only gets used around town during business hours, so a short range isn't a problem. And on the off chance that the boss or myself need to drive it home, both of us live less than 10km from work.

We would be totally happy buying a cheaper vehicle with a smaller battery as if we ever needed to go on a roadt trip we'd probably take one of our petrol powered vehicles.

I might have missed it earlier but how many KM's do you have on it now Duncan?

Another one of the issues is that battery life is related quite a bit to number of charging cycles, smaller batteries are obviously going to go through more cycles to do the same number of km's than bigger ones, or bigger ones might be able to stay out of the 0-20 and 80-100% charge range which is also less optimal for battery life in some cases.

I guess its too early to tell as we only really have 3 major production runs of vehicles at the moment that have had a few years out there (tesla, i3's and leaf), and they all use different cell chemistry and design philosophies (active cooling vs passive etc). There's reports of Tesla's with 5 years/300k km still being at 90% battery capacity, and then we have the opposite with 66% after 5 years with something like the Leaf so there certainly is a lot of variability in there people will be worried about. Some sort of battery specific warranty for long term use will probably be needed to convince people.

 

Obviously with all the fuss with the early leaf's nissan has made changes to the leaf's battery chemistry and management software so you would expect them to do better. I was thinking that a 30kwh one would suit work for my needs but now second guessing wondering if a 40kwh is more long term future proof in terms of battery degradation.

Its worth pointing out that the 30kwh ones use the same type of cells etc just with better energy density, ditto with the new leaf's 40kwh, however the 60kwh one they're supposed to release at the end of the year switches to a different cell/pack structure so will have different characteristics again (better or worse who knows)

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...