Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

One question ,If you got the tomei dumps and manifolds ceramic coated inside and outside would that help protect them.

In theory it should

Rapid changes in temp contribute to manifold crack. The ceramic coating should greatly reduce heat transfer and allow for slower heating/cooling cycles reducing thermal shock.

In theory it should

Rapid changes in temp contribute to manifold crack.

Indeed.

Along with weight of exhausts poorly hung and movement of exhausts as well when used on circuit, another big factor.

Typical street driven cars don't seem to crack them. It's the guys doing circuit or 400rwkw+ and solid driving that seem to kill them. Your 350rwkw street car would probably be fine... But then... Stock manifolds are fine for that so why bother really? :merli:

Go with stockers, reliable and cheap! (Breaking a Tomei set makes people cry as you gotta take the turbo side out to fix/replace).

-9s 350kw on 98 built 2.6 full boost 22psi by 3800rpm earlier depending on weather

Don't you remember the ride I took you on...

i do and it was awesome still brings a stupid grin to my face i just think its going to be way to hard for me to get everything perfect to get it setup like yours to make the power i want i dont want to get to the end of my build and be dissapointed :unsure:

i do and it was awesome still brings a stupid grin to my face i just think its going to be way to hard for me to get everything perfect to get it setup like yours to make the power i want i dont want to get to the end of my build and be dissapointed :unsure:

As i keep saying - you've got a LOT more to put into the driveline/suspension yet. Nick has a well sorted set-up and that's what makes it fast in the roundy roundy stuff, not just the power (which is still good) of course).

My R33 R was SOOooooo much more fun to drive, and faster, with the suspension/brakes/diffs/transfer case all done. So much so that if I was doing another build I'd do all that first before going for power. I drove a mates R33 R without decent suspension/diff/transfer case and it was nowhere near as fast as mine. Both cars had similar engine builds/brakes/power

As i keep saying - you've got a LOT more to put into the driveline/suspension yet. Nick has a well sorted set-up and that's what makes it fast in the roundy roundy stuff, not just the power (which is still good) of course).

My R33 R was SOOooooo much more fun to drive, and faster, with the suspension/brakes/diffs/transfer case all done. So much so that if I was doing another build I'd do all that first before going for power. I drove a mates R33 R without decent suspension/diff/transfer case and it was nowhere near as fast as mine. Both cars had similar engine builds/brakes/power

im worried about getting the ceramics off the engine bay as a first priority then im sorting the suspension

Yeah that is always a good idea (I more meant building motors and what not, should've been clearer :))

haha im trying to plan forward so what i buy now will be applicable when i start to build over engineer so stuff dosnt break

IMHO response and all thar fluff costs thousands and adds a few kws to the party. Just get a good spread of power and spend the thousands you have just saved on actually punting the car at the occassional track days

This got it right on page 1

Prime example here in Vic is everyone said you needed 380rwkw to get a GTR into the 'teens' at Sandown. Then one day it was done solidly with 330rwkw and full weight. It came down to the things mentioned earlier - and a driver with experience and knowledge of his car :)

Put -9s on (so its still responsive around town), and spend time/money in getting the car sorted in the more important areas - especially seat time, as you'll chop times consistently for years In most cases especially as you develop the car. Enjoy milling over that for the next month lol :merli:

Only his reasoning for improved times is wrong :) It had more to do with the tech of tyres and change from RE55s to AO50s. The change from 98-100ROn to E85...those two factors alone mean there is no point comparing times...not to mention the final factor that tracks are being re-surfaces. Sandown is faster simply because of re-surfacing and now PI is >1.5seconds quicker due to re-surfacing.

But to the core of the question. The things that increase response. Well everything is a compromise and trade off. But the main things are to reduce inertia so smaller lighter materials for things like turbo wheels, tailshaft, accessories on the front of the engine. Reponse comes from good culinder filling and gas velocity so as others have touched on dont go crazy big bore on inelt pipes and headwork.

If you want Mines like response just put 2 stroke/rotary like gearing in your car and the need to swap gears every 2 seconds will have you thinking you are driving the most responsive car in the world :) But silly statement but raises the intersting point is to look at gearing and diff chanegs are an option.

If you are talking engines then bin the head. Get an RB25 R33 or R34 head, put an built for purpose inlet manifold on the car and just jam fist fulls of boost into it

Only his reasoning for improved times is wrong :) It had more to do with the tech of tyres and change from RE55s to AO50s. The change from 98-100ROn to E85...those two factors alone mean there is no point comparing times...not to mention the final factor that tracks are being re-surfaces. Sandown is faster simply because of re-surfacing and now PI is >1.5seconds quicker due to re-surfacing.

There is every point. It's the whole point about car development over time and making improvements in various areas. If tyre changes simply meant no point, then why bother even comparing anything? Tyres are always going to evolve just like car set-ups.

Go back 5-6 years then with AO50s and resurfacing - those times still wouldn't have been done as there is still improvements being made, such is the nature of developing a car.

There is every point. It's the whole point about car development over time and making improvements in various areas. If tyre changes simply meant no point, then why bother even comparing anything? Tyres are always going to evolve just like car set-ups.

Go back 5-6 years then with AO50s and resurfacing - those times still wouldn't have been done as there is still improvements being made, such is the nature of developing a car.

Yeh, its always a matter of factors. But the 3 biggest factors are tyres, track and E85...so car development is a far smaller variable. Take them off E85 and put them back on RE55s if you want a good indication of just how much the cars have really developed

come on guys there must be other ways to get more out of the bottom end im curious and want to learn

How's your bank account look?...VCAM is another option...

or rather than chasing the power at low rpm, what about lightening the rotational load (carbon shafts, carbon clutch etc) to help response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...