Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ahh well lucky most of us on the forum seem happy with the HPI rules, no matter how silly it seems to others and with some of the 60ft's I've seen from the rwd imports 1.6-1.7 I really don't think it will hold anyone back unless they want a reason to whinge or an excuse as to why it didn't happen for them, In short if there car is set us right and they have the power they claim they do a radial tyre will do fine :D

yeah what he said :(

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I really don't think it will hold anyone back unless they want a reason to whinge or an excuse as to why it didn't happen for them...

Well if your saying no one has the right to complain either way, I think I agree too.

Let those who choose radials or cross ply street tyres do so without fear of disrespect, both are accepted regardless of HPI on these forums. Case closed :rant:

Well if your saying no one has the right to complain either way, I think I agree too.

Let those who choose radials or cross ply street tyres do so without fear of disrespect, both are accepted regardless of HPI on these forums. Case closed :rant:

hahaha :bs!: I don't accept the times run on cross ply tyres as being in the same category as times run on radial tyres, as street legal cross ply tyres include Mickey Thompson ET Streets which are a cheater slick no matter how you want to sugar coate the words and I think you'll find most will agree with me or if you like we can start a poll then the Case will be closed

et_street.gif

they even come with a warning " WARNING: ET Street tires have passed D.O.T. requirements but have reduced tread depth and compounds designed for racing. Due to the reduced tread depth these tires should be used on dry pavement only and are not suitable for normal highway use!"

hahaha :bs!: I don't accept the times run on cross ply tyres as being in the same category as times run on radial tyres, as street legal cross ply tyres include Mickey Thompson ET Streets which are a cheater slick no matter how you want to sugar coate the words and I think you'll find most will agree with me or if you like we can start a poll then the Case will be closed

et_street.gif  

they even come with a warning " WARNING: ET Street tires have passed D.O.T. requirements but have reduced tread depth and compounds designed for racing. Due to the reduced tread depth these tires should be used on dry pavement only and are not suitable for normal highway use!"

I'd like to remind you that the argument started with all 'crossplys' in general not just ET's.

Having said that it's still a street tyre I'm afraid, even if it is a rather bald one. I understand why I wouldn't want them on my car but, I also understand why people choose them for the sunny sunday cars they drive to the drags.

Lets face it, the argument is over a tyre that you drag race on and drive home on.

I also think if we are talking about crossply's we should mention hoosier (chain link tread) too. If you discriminate against all non radials you lock out Indy profiles and sportsmans in the Mickey T range all of which you might see on a historic muscle car driving around the road.

I'd like to think imports are fast enough even on radials to be put next to the historic 1/4mile blasters of history like the Barrcuda BO29 and others that had only crossply technology. I think they are so I don't see the point in the winge about it being a cheaters tyre. History makes the winger out to be grossly misinformed.

What are you afraid of?

Thats twice now you've made reference to muscle cars and crossply tyres, I can't for the life of me work out what it has to do with RADIAL TYRES and SKYLINES or imports full stop in a Skyline forum

Last time I checked this is a Skyline forum and the question asked was from a person that drives a R32 not a historic Mustang that may agree with your ideas

And if you really want to face facts the arguement is now that most people don't think a crossply tyre should be in the same category as radial tyres in our SAU drag records or HPI records ... NOTE not historic races or USA muscle cars ... and no matter how you want to argue about it in the long run majority rules

Misinformed ... me ... hahaha I've ran the times on radial tyres in my Skyline have you? Oh thats right you love to quote what it could of done, not what its has done like I can :) maybe it was fear holding you back???

Hope someone can help me out with contact details for suppliers of BF Goodrich drag radials and Nitto drag radials in Sydney?

Ideally I want a drag radial to fit a 15"x10" wheel as close as possible to 26" tall. If I can't get somethign decent there I'll have to use my 18"x10" wheels instead.

Appreciate any help.

mate I'm the person who wished you luck on Saturday, which you arrogantly replied no luck needed or was it luck has nothing to do with it hahaha either way maybe you should of been a touch friendlier :)

Any BF Goodrich Sports tyre store can order them in for you, the Nitto's are pretty scarce now as there isn't a Aus supplier

mate I'm the person who wished you luck on Saturday, which you arrogantly replied no luck needed or was it luck has nothing to do with it hahaha either way maybe you should of been a touch friendlier :)

Any BF Goodrich Sports tyre store can order them in for you, the Nitto's are pretty scarce now as there isn't a Aus supplier

Hehe, no arrogance intended, just my warped sense of humour!

hahaha fair enough, its the BFGoodrich Performance Specialist stores you want to contact http://www.bfgoodrich.com.au/html/dealer.australia

The Nittos most of us NSW guys are using were imported privately and passed on to a few of the bigger work shops in Sydney to sell, as far as I know there are none left and he's not planning on importing any more

BF Goodrich do a 275/75/15 which is exactly what your after and from all reports they are as good if not better then the nitto's anyway

Thats twice now you've made reference to muscle cars and crossply tyres, I can't for the life of me work out what it has to do with RADIAL TYRES and SKYLINES or imports full stop in a Skyline forum

Last time I checked this is a Skyline forum and the question asked was from a person that drives a R32 not a historic Mustang that may agree with your ideas

And if you really want to face facts the arguement is now that most people don't think a crossply tyre should be in the same category as radial tyres in our SAU drag records or HPI records ... NOTE not historic races or USA muscle cars ... and no matter how you want to argue about it in the long run majority rules  

Misinformed ... me ... hahaha I've ran the times on radial tyres in my Skyline have you? Oh thats right you love to quote what it could of done, not what its has done like I can :D maybe it was fear holding you back???

Let me see if I can follow your logic.

In the first parragraph you ask what muscle cars have to do with skylines.

It looks like you are saying that a principle that applies to other cars of different brand or make, or country of origin to a skyline does not apply.

I have used the muscle car example of the 'street crossply' only because it's one that easily recognised. A concept which may be transfered to a skyline for possible increased performance over the 1/4 mile.

In the next parragraph.

you are saying that the crossply and radial are in different categories. In previous posts you suggest that one is a street class tyre the other is not.

I don't see why such a poor philosophy and argument should be adopted by our drag racing members? It's true that majority rules, they just aren't necessarily right.

Finally,

You sugest that not having done something in a skyline it makes you misinformed. If I say that according to the theory of gravity when I drop an apple it will fall, according to your logic I will remain misinformed until I drop an apple. Even if I drop pears and bannanas. Because I have driven faster cars than yours over the 1/4mile to better times (and for your information I have) doesn't mean I know more than you. I don't need that fact to make an argument.

I'm sure I'm misinformed about quite alot of things I am yet to be pointed out on. The crossply considered a street tyre is not one of them.

I'd like to remain open minded about this. So if there is some argument I haven't considered please enlighten me. I am happy to learn new things.

hahaha fair enough, its the  BFGoodrich Performance Specialist stores you want to contact

The Nittos most of us NSW guys are using were imported privately and passed on to a few of the bigger work shops in Sydney to sell, as far as I know there are none left and he's not planning on importing any more

BF Goodrich do a 275/75/15 which is exactly what your after and from all reports they are as good if not better then the nitto's anyway

Thanks for your help dude!

When I look at the BFG sites it is a bit confusing. The Comp TA Drag Radials seem to be giving way to gForce TA Drag Radial.

Anyway after much phoning I have some 275/50 R15 at 25.9" tall Comp TA drag radials on the way over the Tasman due to arrive Monday 21/6 in Melbourne. From there to Sydney by Tuesday 22/6 ready for the next WSID street meet, God willing and the creeks don't rise.

If you want to run radials and know that you wont run a Qtr as fast, then that’s up to you. Don’t complain about it and make excuses about “I run radials etc.” At the end of the day, it’s the ET that counts. How you get it is up to you.

Yeah, I am aware that you usually drop the trap speed to gain ETs when changing from street tyres to DRs or slicks.

I am perfectly willing to trade down from 132 mph to get into the 11s. I'm also wondering if the traps will drop given that I'm wheelspinning in all five gears on the street tyres.

I'm probably more likely to hit the rev limiter in top gear (136.8 mph with 275/50 R15 DRs), unless the DRs grow a tad like slicks?

The Comp TA Drag Radials seem to be giving way to gForce TA Drag Radial.

The Comp TA's are what you're after, dude. Check out some pics of Nabil's 8THSIN Supra launching on the size you're talking about and you'll be immediately convinced. The gForce radials from BFG are designed with the American FWD market in mind. This is demonstrated by the sizes in which they are available. That's not to say that they don't ALSO suit a RWD arrangement (see Ben from UAS's MR2 for more).

Good luck at the next street meet. Hope to see you there. And remember... Luck is ALWAYS part of the equation :D

Adrian

The Comp TA's are what you're after, dude.  Check out some pics of Nabil's 8THSIN Supra launching on the size you're talking about and you'll  be immediately convinced.  The gForce radials from BFG are designed with the American FWD market in mind.  This is demonstrated by the sizes in which they are available.  That's not to say that they don't ALSO suit a RWD arrangement (see Ben from UAS's MR2 for more).

Good luck at the next street meet.  Hope to see you there.  And remember... Luck is ALWAYS part of the equation

Adrian

Hee hee, you're right about luck Adrian!

I've got Comp TAs on the way so hopefully they'll be on the car next Wednesday. I've never launched with DRs so I've got a bit of learning to do there. With my street tyres anything over 2,200RPM on launch was a smokefest. I'd love to be able to launch higher ...

What sort of pressure should I try for starters on DRs with a 2900 lb car? And what sort of burnout if any makes sense for DRs?

2900lb is lighter than my R33 and I run 13-14psi in the Nitto's. I'd try 18psi in them to start with and *maybe* drop it to as far as 12 from there. Obviously you'd do that in increments to guage the best pressure.

As far as burnouts go, I have never been one for massive smoke-shows. In fact, I have read on American Supra & Mustang forums that the BF's require only a small burnout to get them to an acceptable operating temperature. Take the marketing with a grain of salt as when they say, "Little or no burnout req'd" they are REALLY trying to say, "These things wear out fuggin' quick and if you don't shred them, they'll last longer."

Also, you should find that you don't have to do as big a burnout as the first one during the course of a day. They do actually retain some heat.

In terms of launching, I have absoluteley no idea what will work well with your car. Radial tyres, (soft compound or not) don't behave in the same balooning type of way as drag slicks due to their radial construction. The radial belts hold the shape for road driving as well as race driving.

They do however squat like a bastard!!

Good luck mate!!

Adrian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...