Jump to content
SAU Community

Intake Size For New Turbo


Jayden.K
 Share

Recommended Posts

im installing a 3076r on my r34 and the intake pipe i have is a 3 inch, but i have a 4 inch anti surge housing on my turbo, so question is can i get away with a 3 to 4'' silicone adaptor at the turbo or will this be to restrictive having a 3 inch pipe coming to the turbo?? this is instead getting a new custom 4'' pipe to save a bit of time and money. but then i will have the reducer and the afm with the 4'' pipe (z32 has a 3'' housing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i have read/heard about this just keep to intake pipe same size as the outlet, but i guess like u said u run into drams with the afm and stuff, so i cant see why you couldnt do that, maybe if ur chasing big power down the track that could be an issue, than again u could go to a map sensor ecu, and not have to run a afm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool thanks I'm not worried about the Afm just the air flow up to the turbo being different maybe causing some dramas, the extra inch is pretty much the surge slots so all I was worried about was them not being utilised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The compressors inlet diametre from memory is 57mm (2 1/4") and the only reason the compressor housings boss is 100mm (4") is for the ported shroud .

The Z32 is 80mm (3 1/8 OD) and internally is the smallest part of the inlet plumbing . I doubt its bore size is any larger than 76mm (3") so using 4" pipe wouldn't gain any flow only volume .

A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool thanks I'm not worried about the Afm just the air flow up to the turbo being different maybe causing some dramas, the extra inch is pretty much the surge slots so all I was worried about was them not being utilised.

AFM needs to be AS FAR away as possible from the intake, and it'll be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im installing a 3076r on my r34 and the intake pipe i have is a 3 inch, but i have a 4 inch anti surge housing on my turbo, so question is can i get away with a 3 to 4'' silicone adaptor at the turbo or will this be to restrictive having a 3 inch pipe coming to the turbo?? this is instead getting a new custom 4'' pipe to save a bit of time and money. but then i will have the reducer and the afm with the 4'' pipe (z32 has a 3'' housing).

I went 4inch because it looks better and hopefully lets the turbo breath better,

if the dump is bigger than the turbine, shouldnt the intake be bigger than the compressor for max hp?

Edited by AngryRBGTX
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the point is that I wont gain or improve anything buy going 4inch as the turbo doesn't need that space to do its job and the impeller itself isnt that big. The Turbo is low mount so it was going to be squishy with a 4inch. But I'll stick with my 3 inch pipe and use the reducer at the turbo. Thanks for all the input

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...