Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not sure where to post this but i figured photography would be best related section to do so.

Over the last weekend I took some time with my friend to make a short film on my R34, still practising with different lighting, areas, camera angles & shots etc

thought I would share and check out for some feedback if anyone here has experience with video making..!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/420014-r34-trial-video/
Share on other sites

Not a bad start!

You're creating a flair for suspense and the dramatic.

In just 2-3 takes (- not all), why not get a lovely looking young lady (- slim and sleek like your car) > she's dressed in a royal blue skirt with gold piping - and carrying her shoes > she's running barefoot from post to post > trying to get away from you - the stalker > a close-up reveals beads of sweat on her brow - she's frightened > clip ends with a bang from your starter pistol (dubbed in - being in a public carpark).

The lady also fills in some blank spaces without detracting from the vertical posts whilst she's slim herself - and she only needs to be in the distance + only one close-up required near the end.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/420014-r34-trial-video/#findComment-6754480
Share on other sites

Some nice work in there. I really like the fisheye, dolly and slider work.

For a short vid, say max 2-3 minutes just altering angles and glamour shots like you did work well.

Any longer and it starts to get repetitive and you have to find a way to break up the repetition. Find interesting stuff in the location and do some sliders and pans on it. Say the refection of a flouro light or a cement beam. Video is interesting because you can take an ordinary object say like that painted cement beam and using fixed focus and slider slide down to focus and thereby make it an interesting to watch, but a real tease to the viewer cause they are wondering, when will the car come into the shot... and it doesn't.

Think of it kind of like striptease when doing glamour stuff. The viewer wants the glorious glamour visuals but if you give it to them all the time they get bored of it. You need to string them out and make them want it a bit. I do this also by mixing macro shots in, like emblems, stickers, small details and some shots from the location that are totally irrelevant to the subject. Watch Top Gear UK, they are masters at this.

The dark area with good color balance and lighting highlights was pretty good. That can be really tough to get right.

I also noticed that a few of your focus pulls went just a little too far. It came into focus but then overshot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/420014-r34-trial-video/#findComment-6754498
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Not a bad start!

You're creating a flair for suspense and the dramatic.

In just 2-3 takes (- not all), why not get a lovely looking young lady (- slim and sleek like your car) > she's dressed in a royal blue skirt with gold piping - and carrying her shoes > she's running barefoot from post to post > trying to get away from you - the stalker > a close-up reveals beads of sweat on her brow - she's frightened > clip ends with a bang from your starter pistol (dubbed in - being in a public carpark).

The lady also fills in some blank spaces without detracting from the vertical posts whilst she's slim herself - and she only needs to be in the distance + only one close-up required near the end.

Thanks mate, that was what we were aiming for at the start, to draw suspense make it look almost mysterious so people keep watching to see it revealed. lady will be involved in the next one for sure. this was just a practice test in an underground car park to play around. very neat idea though had something similiar in mind but will have to try when shooting next! i was looking to implement in those slow still focus/pan points whether it be a girl or some sort of activity blurred in the background to make the still image look more attractive as i noticed people would tend to get bored of a long panning scene. will see how i go with the next one!

Some nice work in there. I really like the fisheye, dolly and slider work.

For a short vid, say max 2-3 minutes just altering angles and glamour shots like you did work well.

Any longer and it starts to get repetitive and you have to find a way to break up the repetition. Find interesting stuff in the location and do some sliders and pans on it. Say the refection of a flouro light or a cement beam. Video is interesting because you can take an ordinary object say like that painted cement beam and using fixed focus and slider slide down to focus and thereby make it an interesting to watch, but a real tease to the viewer cause they are wondering, when will the car come into the shot... and it doesn't.

Think of it kind of like striptease when doing glamour stuff. The viewer wants the glorious glamour visuals but if you give it to them all the time they get bored of it. You need to string them out and make them want it a bit. I do this also by mixing macro shots in, like emblems, stickers, small details and some shots from the location that are totally irrelevant to the subject. Watch Top Gear UK, they are masters at this.

The dark area with good color balance and lighting highlights was pretty good. That can be really tough to get right.

I also noticed that a few of your focus pulls went just a little too far. It came into focus but then overshot.

Thanks! was aiming to keep it short, i think it total we had a good 20-25 minutes worth of different shots it got cut down to. next one for sure will be with more detail and features. i like that idea. creates a bit more suspense as viewers are expecting to see the car appear. the lighting in there was alright maybe not the best but will be working on different locations next time.

yeah i noticed that also with the focus need to work on that a little bit more!

cheers for the feedback guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/420014-r34-trial-video/#findComment-6769656
Share on other sites

Technically very good man. Colours/lighting/slides/focus (for the most part) are all great.

Edit wise, if you don't actually have something worth more than 2 minutes of my time don't make it 3 minutes. Not saying ur car is only worth 2 minutes, but you just repeated stuff for a lot of time. Could uave cut the driving in carpark in half, or shown driving to the park... also a few doubles on the same angle. I.e. wheel and rear of car.

It's just practice I guess, f u take on board all the strong feedback in here you'll improve super fast! We will be watching out for your next vid :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/420014-r34-trial-video/#findComment-6771588
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
×
×
  • Create New...