Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You can tune Low and HIgh Octane fuel and timing maps 16*16 resolution, knock sensitivity, acceleration pumps, CLT and MAT compensation tables. A knock sensor that actually retards timing when it sensors a certain level. It basically retains all of the original functions its just that with the software you will be able to alter these values to the new desire tune.

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You can tune Low and HIgh Octane fuel and timing maps 16*16 resolution, knock sensitivity, acceleration pumps, CLT and MAT compensation tables.  A knock sensor that actually retards timing when it sensors a certain level.  It basically retains all of the original functions its just that with the software you will be able to alter these values to the new desire tune.

have i miss something here but the pfc has 20*20 resolution amd can be tune for what ever octane fuel you like ,has great knock sensor sensitivty (or why would australias fastest gtr ( KW) still retain a pfc and hand controller when he is running a fully optioned motec).The pfc also runs compensation tables ?

It runs the lower octane map if you put lower octane fuel in it that. It has sensitivity but no ability to retard the timing.

The thing is the standard computer is more consistent than the PFC and doesn't need any higher resolution, the interpolation and extrapolation is exceptional. How much do you think nissan spent developing their ECU compared to APEXI I would say about a whole F***load more.

The PFC is very powerfull computer dont get me wrong, its ok to tune and although a little nintendo like it does create a nice tune. THe difference comes in calculating the transitions and acceleration rates and predicting where the motor is heading thats what make a good computer. Try to think outside the box or inside the box I should say!

So the only difference you can show is the to ability the retard when knock level reached the rest is your personal option, as who can truely say what company sent on development but i can say the std computer was only design to run 208kw where the development of the pfc was 208kw to 1000kw+ (apexi 8sec drag car runs pfc). To call the pfc inconsistent is a big call, as it must be close to the world most used after market ecu on the rb series engine. The pfc ability to control large injectors at low % operation is nothing short of remarkable and i must have talked to a dozen other tuner who have had not a problem with the units ability .Personally i have met an unhappy pfc owner but thats only my experience unfortunately i can't say the same the same for alot of the others(wolf,mines chipped ecu,etc).

But if the pfc is so lacking and inconsistent as you say i'm sure you will find a large market for your home grown software and really how could a company the size of APEXI compete with you at home on your laptop.

how do you intend to re-burn the chip for the R33 ECU?

From what ive seen and dabbled in a loooong time ago in a galaxy far far away

The Stock 33 ECU has a totally different type of chip. It can only be burnt once, not overwritten.

To be overwritten you'd need to convert it via a daughterboard or similar to have a basic R32 setup... or follow a costly burning route. Which everytime you want a retune is gonna cost you $$$$

My old R33 ECU has this setup, but it was one of very few ever seen out of Japan.

It runs the lower octane map if you put lower octane fuel in it that.  It has sensitivity but no ability to retard the timing.  

are you saying this about the PowerFC or stocker ecu?

The software I'm making is just a way of editing the factory computer. Sure there are limits of the factory ECU of which I dont know yet but as I've said around 400rwkw is what i've seen and it drove beautifully.

I never said that the PFC was inconsistent I just said that the standard ECU is more consistent, more powerful with mathematical calculations. The thing is how many skylines out there are over 400rwkw - not that many I would suggest. This is where my software will hopefully bridge the gap.

I will say that the PFC is shit for tuning time but so are the likes of Wolf. The datalogit type software should be standard software with PFC IMHO. PFC is also my preference for the skyline in regards to aftermarket computers so dont get me wrong I'm not underestimating it at all.

Dont knock the home PC thats where Bill Gates came from.

how do you intend to re-burn the chip for the R33 ECU?

From what ive seen and dabbled in a loooong time ago in a galaxy far far away

The Stock 33 ECU has a totally different type of chip. It can only be burnt once, not overwritten.

To be overwritten you'd need to convert it via a daughterboard or similar to have a basic R32 setup... or follow a costly burning route. Which everytime you want a retune is gonna cost you $$$$  

My old R33 ECU has this setup, but it was one of very few ever seen out of Japan.

are you saying this about the PowerFC or stocker ecu?

The standard ECU, if it detects more knock than what it has learnt it will revert to a lower octane map of where the timing numbers are reduced.

Ahh dont really want to reveal at this stage. Sorry

A properly tuned PowerFC wont knock ;)

So there is no need to revert to a less powerful map.

And dont forget you can put sh|t pertol in and just alter the figure with the H/C via the PFC.

I've done that before loads of times when i cant find premium nearby.

takes all of 15seconds to knock timing out of it

well once you do its gonna be easy enough to copy anyhow mate :)

rest assured.

But it cant be much differet to what i have mentioned above from what ive seen

as alot of you guys said it is not only the computer you have too look at it is the tuner too, i have seen alot of power maid with the rb26 using a dta it was some where around 860hp to be exact and i am personally using an electromotive on my rb26 and looking to get around the same power or maybe more if i can, i really think all the computers are good it is the tuner who has to know what he is doing.

I know. I have been doing it for the past year and its not something you can sell to a mechanic. He most likely has a HEx editor that displays data that is being accessed at that exact moment. If you've seen the current software you would now its just tables and tables of hexidecimal code.

Such a negative bunch aren't we.

I run an Autronic SMC in my race car. For a race car it's perfect, for the street it does more than what you really need but if you like tweaking engines i don't think you'll find much better.

So they are $1800 or so and then you need all the compatible sensors to run it, but I'll bet you have more horsepower per dollar when compared to another type of ecu setup on a similar engine. If not more horsepower you'll have better drivability/ torque.

Turbine.

Rob82,

Have you had any experience tuning the stock ecu's with RX7 550cc high imp. injectors and the rb20?

I remember Martin had issues with trying to obtain a decent idle.

RX7 injectors being squirters they don't atomize fuel too well, that combined with the 2ltr 6cyl it doesn't work too well. :D

Rob82,

Have you had any experience tuning the stock ecu's with RX7 550cc high imp. injectors and the rb20?

I remember Martin had issues with trying to obtain a decent idle.

RX7 injectors being squirters they don't atomize fuel too well, that combined with the 2ltr 6cyl it doesn't work too well. :D

We have a R32 GTS4 RB20DET with quite a few mods done to it, also with those injectors installed.

If we did'nt tell anyone they were in their, they would'nt know the difference with the idle and low RPM stability. This is with the standard ecu.

http://www.turboclub.com/Australia/Members...GTS4_AWD_21.jpg

Turbine

I think we need to clarify a few things;

1. In our race team cars we have a number of different ECU's (Power FC's, Motec's, Microtech's, Autronic's and even an Electromotive in the SuperTourer). I can tell you that I truly believe only the PFC gives driveability as "nice" as the standard ECU with a very sensible amount of set up and tuning time. We can install a PFC and get a reasonably modified Skyline to run very nicely for ~$1300 (including the cost of the PFC). We can also get a Skyline to run nicely on a Motec, but it will cost closer to $5,000 and it won't make 1% more power either.

2. On line tuning for R32/Z32/S13 vintage ECU's has been around for years. Plenty of tuners have the software and the experience to carry out that process. The cost is usually around $800, being $500 for the rechip and $300 for the tune.

The problem is I can buy a Power FC for $950 now, that takes similar tuning time to a rechip of the standard ecu. So for $450 extra I get the Commander, which saves me buying a whole heap of gauges and gives me superior diagnostic ability to the Consult style readers (which cost $300 or so on their own).

3.There is considerable difficulty with rechipping the later vintage ECU's (R33GTST, R34GTT, Stagea S1 & S2 and R34GTR). Since R33GTST is the most popular model currently modified, this issue is not to be underestimated. There are some Japanese tuned (rechip via daughter board)) ECU's around, but their cost makes my nose bleed.

Buying a Power FC for this vintage is even more worthwhile with the same advantages (as above) plus a lower cost than the currently available rechips.

Is it any wonder that the PFC is the most popular ECU.:(

Yes cubes, the car feels fine at light load and cruise. Economy is good enough to drive out along the great ocean road from melbourne with the car club.

The real trick was to modify the standard airflow meter so that it sees or feels the same air velocity across the sensor as it would if it had the stock turbo still on it. But it's mass is increased dramatically.

It was difficult to figure but it works. We have had a few tuners baffled by this when they get told what size those injectors are on a stock ecu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You’ll want to have the block drilled and tapped to suit 1/2in head studs and the head for the same. How much power do you intend to make?
    • Sorry for resurrecting an oldish thread Not much has happened in the past year since the last update. The car did another 1000 miles or so and failed the MOT for the first time in October (failed on tyres which had been advised for a couple of years) In October the car got put up for sale and was removed in November due to no interest, being so close to christmas it was to be expected. The roads were dry in February so I decided to tax it early and get the new tyres fitted.   Fast forward to April, I got someone in to give the car a good clean after sitting for the winter.                                 The car got re-advertised and today (Saturday 3rd May) the car sold. The new owner is planning a GTR conversion at some point and a respray in the same pearl white. It's bitter sweet, it's a shame to have the car sit there for half the year and then only do 1000 miles. The kids are growing too quick and space in the back is getting limited. It's been a great 6.5 years of ownership
    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
×
×
  • Create New...