Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There's a lot of ignorance flooding into this thread...wake up guys, short of finger prints there's nothing the cops were able to do. NO EVIDENCE. Doesn't matter how sure you are of something, if you can't prove it then too f**king bad. What you're expecting to have happened is absolutely f**ked when you look at it from an outside perspective.

The shitheads got let go, AS THEY SHOULD WHEN YOU CANNOT PROVE ANY GUILT. The only cockup here was calling the cops in the first place instead of flogging the shit out of them...and calling the cops was still the right thing to do.

I've had previous cars that i've owned that were broken in to numerous times and one that was stolen, and ever since it has been my opinion that car thieves should be shot....

Goodluck, I hope you catch them.

In 20/20 hind sight, if the police stood off, and waited for the car to drive down the street, it would have been a better outcome.

At the end of the day, all bravado aside, risking your life for a car isn't worth it. You just don't know who your trying to stop, and what they have on them.

Great talk on a public forum guys!

I admit I'd want to kill them myself but without any evidence they'll still get away with it plus you'll add a nice assault charge to your record ;)

Not really worth it!

Great talk on a public forum guys!

I admit I'd want to kill them myself but without any evidence they'll still get away with it plus you'll add a nice assault charge to your record ;)

Not really worth it!

Not to worried about it being a public forum.

I knew this when I posted.

The chance of ever seeing these guys is very slim.

A bit of fun with all the tuff talk :mrt:

Most of us know the reality of confronting people, i went to high school too.

(now i think about it, it was a BAD school, one of the students beat up a teacher, knives, drugs etc...the 80's hey what can i say)

An unknown number of strangers in the dark? Youd want some back up or your taking your chances.

Its easier and safer to scare them off.

Edited by D.I.Y. Mik

Great talk on a public forum guys!

I admit I'd want to kill them myself but without any evidence they'll still get away with it plus you'll add a nice assault charge to your record ;)

Not really worth it!

Umm, for girl thieves, the punishment apparently is even more lethal.

They're tied down & forced to drink this...

SnS.jpg

Great talk on a public forum guys!

I admit I'd want to kill them myself but without any evidence they'll still get away with it plus you'll add a nice assault charge to your record ;)

Not really worth it!

they would have to prove it, and there would be no evidence, so no proof.

are you saying I'm fat?

cause I am.

and you don't get this big by eating sloppily.

Geez, you're sensitive!

But now you mention it... :whistling:

Actually I was thinking of the time Matt and I inspected an M3 near the 'gong.

We checked the most recent readings on the computer and the fuel consumption read over 23l/100Km > checked the tyres > feathered heavily > rejected

When I've bought cars off women, the whole interior has been cleaned out - although of course the onside wheels are always scrubbed.

After buying off guys, the cars have had CDs, E-Tags, receipts from red light areas left behind, etc etc.

The worst thing about this, is all it takes is for you to bash the wrong person trying to break into your car and then him and his 40 cousins know where you live and can make your life living hell!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...