Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Curious to know if anyone has experience with both of these mafs in a blow through configuration. Currently i switched to blow through on my RB25 running a J60 (stock) MAFS; I got some dyno time and my MAFS was maxing out @ 5v by 6500RPM so im in need of something that will be able to hold up throughout the whole RPM spectrum. I'm trying to find out if a N62 MAF would be a good choice for this as i already have my hands on one.

Thanks.

Just look at the Nistune documentation. The power ratings of all the AFMs are listed there. FWIW, the easiest option for upgrading the RB25 unit is the Z32. I'm not sure that there are any useful ones between those two anyway.

I did see those, however this is in a blow through configuration which puts more stress on the AFM's as they become pressurized. Just curious to know if anyone had this on their blow through setup with successful results. Everyone told me the J60 was fine in blow through setup, however the dyno proved otherwise. I'm maxed out on my fueling as the AFM has reached it's 5v already before i even red line or finish the RPM range.

That's why you just need to look at the relative power ratings and choose one that has enough headroom over where you are peaking out now.

FWIW, I would never install one of these in blow through, as I do not think the plastic housing and the penetration seals etc were designed to have a lot of pressure inside. And that's before I even start to wonder about the wisdom of hitting the thing with a gutful of hot air (which can happen even after an intercooler if you manage to heat soak it).

I've had no problems so far and i have a few pals that have run them 6yrs+ without any problems, however i do see what you're concerned about and it being pressurized. I am currently only at 13psi and I don't plan on upping it anymore.

i had a z32 in blow through! make sure you have someone that can tune them in that config tho otherwise it opens up a whole world of issues

Yes, my tuner is able to tune for that MAF in that config. Did you run into any problems while in blow through? I'm running a pretty much stock setup, however my J60 was maxing out in blow through around 6500RPM's. It was already getting it's maxed 5v.

Yes, my tuner is able to tune for that MAF in that config. Did you run into any problems while in blow through? I'm running a pretty much stock setup, however my J60 was maxing out in blow through around 6500RPM's. It was already getting it's maxed 5v.

alot of trouble in blow through specially with controlling the fuel map! randomly would fill the cylinders full of fuel no matter what RPM/throttle. even on idle

this wasnt in stock form tho we are talking high mount and full built motor, boost was varied between 13psi and 30psi with no change to the way it acted

alot of trouble in blow through specially with controlling the fuel map! randomly would fill the cylinders full of fuel no matter what RPM/throttle. even on idle

this wasnt in stock form tho we are talking high mount and full built motor, boost was varied between 13psi and 30psi with no change to the way it acted

Oh for sure i gotcha. So you didn't have any troubles with maxing out the maf? This is really my only concern.

nah no issues on that side of things...

what is your reason for running in blow through config?

It all started when i made a custom turbo inlet pipe. I was tired of using the stock silicone accordion looking one. Once i made this new turbo inlet, i got reversion really bad and the car would just suddenly shut off as if the maf was freaking out causing the engine to stall. I read that blow through was a good option as it allowed for your BoV to be non recirculated and also that if your intercooler couplers popped off, you could still drive it home and fix it rather than being stranded.

I went blow through with the J60 stock MAF and have not had any more stalls or reversion so all is well ! I recently went to the dyno to get tuned (NIStune) and it made a lousy 230hp as my VVT solenoid was not working and my MAF was being maxed. I plan on keeping blow through, just wanted to make sure the new maf i replace it with is not going to max out like this one is.

I appreciate your responses.

It all started when i made a custom turbo inlet pipe. I was tired of using the stock silicone accordion looking one. Once i made this new turbo inlet, i got reversion really bad and the car would just suddenly shut off as if the maf was freaking out causing the engine to stall. I read that blow through was a good option as it allowed for your BoV to be non recirculated and also that if your intercooler couplers popped off, you could still drive it home and fix it rather than being stranded.

I went blow through with the J60 stock MAF and have not had any more stalls or reversion so all is well ! I recently went to the dyno to get tuned (NIStune) and it made a lousy 230hp as my VVT solenoid was not working and my MAF was being maxed. I plan on keeping blow through, just wanted to make sure the new maf i replace it with is not going to max out like this one is.

I appreciate your responses.

fair call tho the easiest option would of been a GFB dual circ bov that is bolt on :)

There's a couple of items to address there.

1) Blow through AFM and venting BOV. This is only valid if you locate the AFM after the BOV location. And seeing as the best place for the BOV is close to the TB, this is hard to do properly.

2) New turbo inlet & reversion. I have a nice steel inlet that was fabricated to replicate the original shape & BOV return etc and never suffered any reversion problems. This was with up to 14 psi on RB20 (and now with less boost on 25Neo, which probably doesn't compare). Whether these things cause reversion problems or not is all in the design and fabrication. It's worth fiddling with that rather than relocating the AFM IMO.

fair call tho the easiest option would of been a GFB dual circ bov that is bolt on :)

My BoV was on the coldpipe side and that would have required a long 4' hose across my engine bay making it even uglier :P. Call me ricer, but i love the sound of a venting BoV. It's good to know the N62 wont max out.

Thanks

There's a couple of items to address there.

1) Blow through AFM and venting BOV. This is only valid if you locate the AFM after the BOV location. And seeing as the best place for the BOV is close to the TB, this is hard to do properly.

2) New turbo inlet & reversion. I have a nice steel inlet that was fabricated to replicate the original shape & BOV return etc and never suffered any reversion problems. This was with up to 14 psi on RB20 (and now with less boost on 25Neo, which probably doesn't compare). Whether these things cause reversion problems or not is all in the design and fabrication. It's worth fiddling with that rather than relocating the AFM IMO.

AFM is already relocated about 8" from the TB and my BoV is located now on the hotpipe. My Setup is exactly how i want it and everything is in the location i want it.

Whether these things cause reversion problems or not is all in the design and fabrication. It's worth fiddling with that rather than relocating the AFM IMO.

^^ This.

Lol at deciding to run blow a though afm simply because the bov return was welded on the wrong angle. Put it back to stock and run one of my intakes before you get defected. :P

Nothing was welded on wrong....there simply was no BOV recirc fitting on the inlet. I do not want to recirculate my BOV as that would mean a 4' hose would be running in my engine bay.

Pics of "your" inlet?

The bov return hose can be quite small, and you could use heater hose if you wanted to keep it a low profile. Have you got a pic of your engine bay?

My intakes are setup for 32-34 gtst so it may need mods to fit. Notice the angle the bov return enters, it needs to face the compressor wheel.

post-63525-0-50983600-1361827966_thumb.jpg

The bov return hose can be quite small, and you could use heater hose if you wanted to keep it a low profile. Have you got a pic of your engine bay?

My intakes are setup for 32-34 gtst so it may need mods to fit. Notice the angle the bov return enters, it needs to face the compressor wheel.

Looks nice!

Do you have a pic of it installed?

I've got an S14 with RB25 so the fitment will be different i assume. There is less space for me to work.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...