Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Done lots of research and found lots of conflicting info and most of it fairly old so thought I'd ask specifically what I'm after. I have a RS4S Stagea (factory manual, NEO engine) and am after a good ECU to enable tuning with the parts I've collected (highmount 3076, GTR cooler, FFP etc). What I need to know is does the ATTESA (I believe RS4S is the same as R33 GTR) system use information from the engine ECU or is it totally independant using G sensors and wheel speed only? An aftermarket ECU to suit a NEO may not have ATTESA outputs and a GTR ECU would have ATTESA but not VCT function (plus wanting 2 AFM inputs). Was wanting an easy plug in ECU but it's looking like it may not be that easy....

ATTESA runs of its own ECU, like you said it uses G sensors to transfer power to the front wheels.

So it doesn't use a throttle position signal at all? I wondering what might happen say negotiating a hard corner while under brakes, although there is no power being delivered to the transmission the G sensors will still activate the clutch pack in the transfer case?

  • Like 1

Just Nistune your existing ECU. That's the easiest option. Tuneable enough for what you want and zero other problems.

Thanks, I considered that but the NEO head on the 25 block will be a temporary thing as I would like to build a 30 bottom end and squeeze a fair bit out of it. Obviously the 3076 would have to go but the plan is to put money only into the top end at this stage so I can swap everything onto the new block and add bigger turbo. I'd like to have the ECU side of things sorted prior as well if possible...

I don't know the details of what is sent from ECU to ATTESSA computer, especially on the later ones. I do know that the vehicle speed sensor signal is passed to the ATTESSA computer, but I don't know if it is output from the ECU or if it is direct from the speedo. I would guess that it is direct from the speedo.

TPS is unlikely to be used by ATTESSA. The G-sensors are exclusively connected to ATTESSA.

PLUS......many people have run many GTRs and Stageas with aftermarket ECUs without having problems with ATTESSA. That would tend to suggest that the ATTESSA computer is not particularly fussy about the ECU.

I do know that the R34 (as an example) ECU will crack the shits at you if you try to run it without the ATTESSA and ABS computers that it expects to see. Will raise fault codes and CEL, and ultimately will interfere with engine operation if you try to make lots of power without the other computers there. I suspect this behaviour is pretty much one way traffic, and that you'd be fine to have the ATTESSA and ABS computers there without the factory ECU.

The trouble with all this theory is that the various computers are connected to each other on a serial bus. So there's not easily findable/probe-able pins carrying discrete signals. When they talk to each other, they just send messages on the bus. Makes it hard to know for sure.

Ah thanks mate, good info, just what I was after. The speed signal coming direct from the speedo definately rings a bell now that you mention it. Yes I find these systems tricky to figure out I deal with CAN bus and CAT data link a bit through work and it definately pays to ask around before cracking out the schematics as someone has likely been down the same road before. Cheers :thumbsup:

When I fitted a Stagea engine to my R32 GTS4, I also added a Wolf ECU (wired in, not PnP). Then, when the engine fired up - "Houston, we have a problem" - no AWD.

The ATTESSA ECU gets a TPS signal via the ECU. Solution was a "black box" add-on from Wolf.

I suspect if you get a PnP ECU, then you shouldn't have problems with ATTESSA.

When I fitted a Stagea engine to my R32 GTS4, I also added a Wolf ECU (wired in, not PnP). Then, when the engine fired up - "Houston, we have a problem" - no AWD.

The ATTESSA ECU gets a TPS signal via the ECU. Solution was a "black box" add-on from Wolf.

I suspect if you get a PnP ECU, then you shouldn't have problems with ATTESSA.

This is interesting... I posted this question in the Stagea section as well and KiwiRS4T said he thinks he had to to a similar thing when installing his G4 in his series 1, out of interest is your engine a NEO or the R33? I think G4 is PnP right?

This is interesting... I posted this question in the Stagea section as well and KiwiRS4T said he thinks he had to to a similar thing when installing his G4 in his series 1, out of interest is your engine a NEO or the R33? I think G4 is PnP right?

The engine was a C34, I believe (I did the conversion in 2004). I was told - after the fact - that I could have used a GT-R PnP from Wolf ECU.

Thanks guys that's good info, very interesting. I have a PFC from a GTT here somewhere and that's why the question initially crossed my mind. Being for a RWD vehicle it may not have the TPS output. It's possible that it does have the output say the same as a GTR version but it's just not utilised in a non 4wd vehicle. Others have used the same ECU in a Stagea and say 4WD works ok I guess the easiest way would be to plug it in and see but that would mean getting a tune which would be a waste if I wasn't going to use it, food for thought.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...