Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Doing things properly (by that i mean technique aimed at the most efficient lift) then grip doesnt fatigue first. Your back does.

If you are using straps you are maybe performing the movement a little differently.

I would prefer to use fat grips and train grip strength personally.if grip was really an issue

Edited by rev210

This grip thing is quite amusing. Obviously that guy trains in a gym where lots of people use them and get good results, so he is for them, nothing wrong with that at all.

I have a gym where no one wears them, so I am against them.

Now I dont know what kind of weights the members at his gym lift, so I cant comment, but I do know what guys at my gym lift without them

310kg - Jack Pollard

300kg - Zoran Jankovski

290kg - Martin Nguyen

287.5kg - Nick Rankin

275kg - Daniel America

267.5kg - Nick Haralambopoulos

260kg - Max Markopoulos

260kg - Spiros Markopoulos

245kg - Conor Zyskowski

240kg - Alen Pezerovic

240kg - Lee Gamble

Way more, but you get the point. Dont assume everyone needs straps, let lifters choose, but its only fair to show them if you train correctly over a long period you wont need them.

If your concern is reps, here is Martin deadlifting triple bodyweight for 6 reps without grip issues

  • Like 1

Means sweet fa when he spits 3 discs out of his spine

Good luck I hope he never goes thru that as I've seen quite a few who never lifted again after doing stupid shit like 500lbs shrugs with bad ass form

Keep it safe, hard to tell a young ego filled and god knows what else junior (been there done that)

But your back..,, you only get one,

I trained with good form (most times) and still have life long nagging injuries now

Means sweet fa when he spits 3 discs out of his spine

Good luck I hope he never goes thru that as I've seen quite a few who never lifted again after doing stupid shit like 500lbs shrugs with bad ass form

Keep it safe, hard to tell a young ego filled and god knows what else junior (been there done that)

But your back..,, you only get one,

I trained with good form (most times) and still have life long nagging injuries now

Interested to see what you think good form is... Post a vid?

That to my eye looks nigh on perfect, biomechanically for a dead.

You are also speaking about a world record holders form for your info. Perhaps his trainer can comment?

Ok maybe I see things as a bodybuilder who believes in good form to isolate the muscles not sloppy powerlifters form

Shoulders need to be back chin up and no rounding off the back with a slight arch at the top and quick pause.

I never really focused or loved the deadlift like you powerlifters in here I did it when I wasn't squatting I found both in the same week to taxing

I still managed 200kg approx for 5 by the time I was 19 with strict form

Ok maybe I see things as a bodybuilder who believes in good form to isolate the muscles not sloppy powerlifters form

This is an interesting opinion.

We aren't dealing with a beginers technique here. Powerlifter or not ,deadlifting isn't a simple movement at advanced weight levels. Bodybuiders are arguably not the most concerned bunch of people when it comes to form over muscle stimulation. A powerlifters livelyhood is based on being able to compete. One might think it's of greater interest to minimise muscle injury and maximise strength development through perfection of technique?

Shoulders need to be back chin up and no rounding off the back with a slight arch at the top and quick pause.

Chin up or neck tucked in is debate worthy (your vid posted is very tucked in, this provides better neutral spine at the expense of losing a slightly stronger upper back contraction in the case of chin up). He has scapular retraction, you can see it. The rounding you are refering to is in the upper back , not the lower. Thorasic mobiltiy as it is otherwise known is key to this movement.

I never really focused or loved the deadlift like you powerlifters in here I did it when I wasn't squatting I found both in the same week to taxing

I still managed 200kg approx for 5 by the time I was 19 with strict form

Thats fair enough. What you are or were interested in is personal preference . Perhaps there is opportunity to evalutate your position on deadlift form, in light of some debate and information? I've found some view changing ideas come from Marko's experience and others, with training technique that applies across goals. Be it body building or powerlifting.

You said you picked up some war wounds from training.. how old are you now? Good to have some sobering insights for the younger gen.

His chin is up until the end not sure why he dips his chin right at the end lol

The other guy doesn't nor the other countless videos that came up instantly

33 started bodybuilding when I was almost 15 went hard till I was 25 since then I had kids and been on and off

I agree with rev...powerlifter form is hardly "sloppy". Form may be slightly different to conventional, because that's what happens at te extremes of lifting heavy weights. Form at 300kg is not the same as form at 150kg. It's in their interests to protect their bodies and safely lift as much weight as possible.

I don't see how you can have had back injuries in the past and be criticising the form of a WR holder, who lifts more weight at less bodyweight than you ever did, without the injuries you incurred? It's like someone from my basketball team trying to tell Lebron how to make a play...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...