Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Doing things properly (by that i mean technique aimed at the most efficient lift) then grip doesnt fatigue first. Your back does.

If you are using straps you are maybe performing the movement a little differently.

I would prefer to use fat grips and train grip strength personally.if grip was really an issue

Edited by rev210

This grip thing is quite amusing. Obviously that guy trains in a gym where lots of people use them and get good results, so he is for them, nothing wrong with that at all.

I have a gym where no one wears them, so I am against them.

Now I dont know what kind of weights the members at his gym lift, so I cant comment, but I do know what guys at my gym lift without them

310kg - Jack Pollard

300kg - Zoran Jankovski

290kg - Martin Nguyen

287.5kg - Nick Rankin

275kg - Daniel America

267.5kg - Nick Haralambopoulos

260kg - Max Markopoulos

260kg - Spiros Markopoulos

245kg - Conor Zyskowski

240kg - Alen Pezerovic

240kg - Lee Gamble

Way more, but you get the point. Dont assume everyone needs straps, let lifters choose, but its only fair to show them if you train correctly over a long period you wont need them.

If your concern is reps, here is Martin deadlifting triple bodyweight for 6 reps without grip issues

  • Like 1

Means sweet fa when he spits 3 discs out of his spine

Good luck I hope he never goes thru that as I've seen quite a few who never lifted again after doing stupid shit like 500lbs shrugs with bad ass form

Keep it safe, hard to tell a young ego filled and god knows what else junior (been there done that)

But your back..,, you only get one,

I trained with good form (most times) and still have life long nagging injuries now

Means sweet fa when he spits 3 discs out of his spine

Good luck I hope he never goes thru that as I've seen quite a few who never lifted again after doing stupid shit like 500lbs shrugs with bad ass form

Keep it safe, hard to tell a young ego filled and god knows what else junior (been there done that)

But your back..,, you only get one,

I trained with good form (most times) and still have life long nagging injuries now

Interested to see what you think good form is... Post a vid?

That to my eye looks nigh on perfect, biomechanically for a dead.

You are also speaking about a world record holders form for your info. Perhaps his trainer can comment?

Ok maybe I see things as a bodybuilder who believes in good form to isolate the muscles not sloppy powerlifters form

Shoulders need to be back chin up and no rounding off the back with a slight arch at the top and quick pause.

I never really focused or loved the deadlift like you powerlifters in here I did it when I wasn't squatting I found both in the same week to taxing

I still managed 200kg approx for 5 by the time I was 19 with strict form

Ok maybe I see things as a bodybuilder who believes in good form to isolate the muscles not sloppy powerlifters form

This is an interesting opinion.

We aren't dealing with a beginers technique here. Powerlifter or not ,deadlifting isn't a simple movement at advanced weight levels. Bodybuiders are arguably not the most concerned bunch of people when it comes to form over muscle stimulation. A powerlifters livelyhood is based on being able to compete. One might think it's of greater interest to minimise muscle injury and maximise strength development through perfection of technique?

Shoulders need to be back chin up and no rounding off the back with a slight arch at the top and quick pause.

Chin up or neck tucked in is debate worthy (your vid posted is very tucked in, this provides better neutral spine at the expense of losing a slightly stronger upper back contraction in the case of chin up). He has scapular retraction, you can see it. The rounding you are refering to is in the upper back , not the lower. Thorasic mobiltiy as it is otherwise known is key to this movement.

I never really focused or loved the deadlift like you powerlifters in here I did it when I wasn't squatting I found both in the same week to taxing

I still managed 200kg approx for 5 by the time I was 19 with strict form

Thats fair enough. What you are or were interested in is personal preference . Perhaps there is opportunity to evalutate your position on deadlift form, in light of some debate and information? I've found some view changing ideas come from Marko's experience and others, with training technique that applies across goals. Be it body building or powerlifting.

You said you picked up some war wounds from training.. how old are you now? Good to have some sobering insights for the younger gen.

His chin is up until the end not sure why he dips his chin right at the end lol

The other guy doesn't nor the other countless videos that came up instantly

33 started bodybuilding when I was almost 15 went hard till I was 25 since then I had kids and been on and off

I agree with rev...powerlifter form is hardly "sloppy". Form may be slightly different to conventional, because that's what happens at te extremes of lifting heavy weights. Form at 300kg is not the same as form at 150kg. It's in their interests to protect their bodies and safely lift as much weight as possible.

I don't see how you can have had back injuries in the past and be criticising the form of a WR holder, who lifts more weight at less bodyweight than you ever did, without the injuries you incurred? It's like someone from my basketball team trying to tell Lebron how to make a play...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...