Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think if I've learned anything, it's that the plateau I'm at in some things will only be broken by going back to my old training methods and that's not something I'm willing to do at this point.

Old methods in terms of training intensity, eating habits, dedication etc.

I've got a lot of other things on the plate now that I see as equally and in some cases more important so mentally I've settled into a happy spot where I can maintain some strength and physique without sacrificing too much of those others things, time money, relationship happiness.

When I can do legs and back again I might switch to a a 3 days split, push, pull, legs, so I can hit bench, DL and squat a bit harder knowing i have a week to recover. Plus I think I can shorten the total time in the gym (important to me at the moment) and still get enough out of it to be happy.

If there's a mental hurdle (beyond having this back/leg issue right now which to me is as much mental as physical) it's about achieving balance.

As for the benching, I get you, I could definitely push harder, but I will say that I was giving it a pretty red hot go on the 8th rep of the last set I did at that weight, I pushed harder than I would normally (as I tend to hold a little back to avoid injury and by hold a little back I just mean that I'll push as hard as I can up until the point I feel stabilizing/secondary muscles faltering and I won't keep smashing through that point like I used to as I know what happens when I do and I like that I've been able to avoid injuries in that way). If I'd had a spotter I think only a little assistance would've been needed to get me through that sticking point and onto the home stretch.

I didnt get an MRI when I tore my leg, if you're all for saving money, ask yourself, or the practitioner, 'Does the treatment change?'

The answer should be no, unless you need an operation, which is HIGHLY unlikely.

They should be able to find the problem without getting a scan, muscle tear treatment is all the same - breakdown scar tissue, increase bloodflow, allow to heal, repeat.

Learning more about the body, muscle groups, attachment points, referal pains etc. helps as well. Allows you to give the practitioner more of a detailed idea if you 'think' thats what might be causing the issue.

I'm off to see her again, this will be the 3rd visit and based on seeing some improement after the second I might extend it to 4-5 and see where we're at.

On the gym front, back into 3x a week and 3x8 (attempting) on the few weighted exercises I do.

Last night I managed:

8/8/5 at 110 on the bench.

Then did 20 reps of squats with just body weight, no bar, moving feet around to find a comfy spot that allows me to get low (see main thread for question on that)

Then did 20 BW calf raises on a wooden board to allow me to get lower.

20 more BW squats, 20 BW more calf raises.

Managed 8/8/6 at 20kg for chins.

Then did 20 alternating lunges, 10 per side, then some more calf raises, then another 20 BW squats, then another 20 lunges.

Then did some REALLY light dumbell reverse deadlift type things - just feeling out my back, only had 3kg on each hand.

Then managed 8/8/8 at 25kg for dips.

Then did 75 sec front plank, 15sec break, 45sec side plank, 10 sec break, other side plank, 30 sec break another 45 sec front plank and called that a day.

Lower back just above and central to my butt cheeks is still quite tight and tender and stretching doesn't help it (but I continue to stretch daily) but at least the really sharp grabs/twinges have eased off in my leg. Still uncomfortable but say 20% improved.

After that went for a very brisk 3k walk, which I've been doing daily as advised by chrio - everything above has been ok'd by her also.

I'm cutting down a little on the eating as well and weirdly I'm looking a touch leaner in the mid section but my weight is not changing.

this stuff takes time unfortunately and patience.

I have a acquaintance (not a friend) who swears by acupuncture as well. Swears it cured him of being ghey

Agreed, I just don't think the Physio is trained to deal with my particular issue at present.

The ankle is simply stretch as much as you can and keep using it and that's as good as it'll get, which I' say is probably 80% as good as it was. It's plenty strong, but it the ROM is not stellar and that impairs other exercises, like squats.

My back is either a DL or squat issue, I'd say squat, caused by ankle not moving properly.

Once the Chrio helps me out there, I'll move on to a Podiatrist and see about some orthotics or something.

It really does kill me inside to know that what I did was permanent, I've never injured anything badly to the point where it was an ongoing problem so this has been a hard pill to swallow, which sounds dramatic given the injuries and disabilities other people live with, so I keep that in perspective.

If it turns out the ankle ROM/Gait can't be "fixed" I will abandon squatting and stick to DL, I'll do lunges and take up cycling for my leg work and bonus cardio.

perhaps invest in some shoes

http://www.ironedge.com.au/store/weightlifting-shoe.html

whenever I have used them my squats improve, balance improves and ROM

can only help right?

also was a bitter pill for me to swallow being told that my supposed heart condition would mean that I would never be able to join the army, no more mma or contact sport, sprinting is out

but oh hey I can go to a picnic and have a light game of soccer with friends............... I literally wanted to punch the doctor in the face

also told in regards to lifting weights "take it easy, just lift to keep in a bit of shape because end of the day it doesn't offer much cardiovascular benefits, go for a brisk walk instead"

also told in regards to lifting weights "take it easy, just lift to keep in a bit of shape because end of the day it doesn't offer much cardiovascular benefits, go for a brisk walk instead"

strong unaware

lol

I'll be honest, I get far more cardio out of hard bike riding than I do weights.

But I don't feel like I'm going to pass out when I've really pushed on the bike, just puffed.

Went to Chiro, she said keep up the exercise, said back required less correction this time and recommended a local Podiatrist.

Will make an appointment with him to see what we can do mechanically to avoid further issues, improve mobility etc.

I'll get this sorted eventually.

The 13th was a year since I broke my leg and dislocated my ankle.

Also, sit works for my shed starts today, woo.

Gym last night, think I'll drop a touch off the bench again as I'm hitting 8-7-5 and I'd rather be going 8-8-8 or at worst 8-8-6

8-7-5 at 110 = 2200kg, 8-8-6 at 105 = 2305kg and if I go 100kg it's 2400kg lifted if I get them all(which I should come close to). So I'm playing with weights at the moment to get as much volume as I can right now.

Did a bunch of 20 reps BW squats between sets of things, many sets of calf raises, some weighted (only 3kg) and many sets of lunges plus my planks etc.

Chins I went 8-8-6 at 20kg and felt I was pulling higher and clearing the bar more.

Dips I added 1.25 and made the full 3x8 at 26.25kg - just.

Went for a 3k walk up the hill also.

Murica.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...