Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have BC's and they go pretty low

heres a link, mine is the white 33 down the page

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/84208-wheel-sizes-offsets-for-skylines/page-123

Looks great man! Awesome height! How do you find the handling on the BC's?

I really don't think your car needs lowering. It looks good as it is.

Are you talking about the rear being too high in terms of wheel gap or rear bumper off the ground. Cause i'd suggest, as others have, just getting a lip and rear pods.

Haha thanks man, i meant the wheel gap, gonna experiment with a front lip and pods and see how I go before changing coilys. Thanks mate!

Lol, as if you're worried about handling at that ride height...

Dude relax, you seem to be taking this topic so personally. The OP has heard what you've got to say and obviously disagrees, why is that a problem?

OP, if you want to lower your car to such an extreme then go for it. Just be aware (as I'm sure you are by now) that what the other guys are saying is correct, it becomes a pain in the ass to drive and lowering the car so much will affect the way the car handles in a negative way. I have got BC's, and I have had my car at a height close to R377's 33 for a couple of years. Not because I don't find it fkn annoying, but because I don't drive the car enough to be assed raising it back up. I've smashed my bumper so many times I've lost count, I'm just lucky that I know how to fibreglass and spray paint. I've also damaged my fenders and tyres from coming off the track and grabbing rubber, that's not so easy/cheap to fix. Every time I park my car, I try to park somewhere where I can turn left, because turning right scrubs my tyre on the inner guard lining. It's horrible and annoying and embarrassing and I hate it. I'll be rectifying it soon.

All in all, my advice to you is to not do it. You've got some nice suspension in there, and the car is already at a nice height, it looks good! It wouldn't be worth trading that just for a bit less height. But, if you want to do it then do it. BC's will get you there, and more. They handle well for what they are, but they aint no Tein's.

If you're referring practicality to the stance trend though, I'm afraid you know nothing buddy.

You dont go belly to the ground and expect to corner awesomely! How are race cars set up? They dont tuck rim.

You either want looooowwwww or you want perfect height for twisties. Yes there is a happy medium but what you are asking is ludicrous

Dude relax, you seem to be taking this topic so personally. The OP has heard what you've got to say and obviously disagrees, why is that a problem?

OP, if you want to lower your car to such an extreme then go for it. Just be aware (as I'm sure you are by now) that what the other guys are saying is correct, it becomes a pain in the ass to drive and lowering the car so much will affect the way the car handles in a negative way. I have got BC's, and I have had my car at a height close to R377's 33 for a couple of years. Not because I don't find it fkn annoying, but because I don't drive the car enough to be assed raising it back up. I've smashed my bumper so many times I've lost count, I'm just lucky that I know how to fibreglass and spray paint. I've also damaged my fenders and tyres from coming off the track and grabbing rubber, that's not so easy/cheap to fix. Every time I park my car, I try to park somewhere where I can turn left, because turning right scrubs my tyre on the inner guard lining. It's horrible and annoying and embarrassing and I hate it. I'll be rectifying it soon.

All in all, my advice to you is to not do it. You've got some nice suspension in there, and the car is already at a nice height, it looks good! It wouldn't be worth trading that just for a bit less height. But, if you want to do it then do it. BC's will get you there, and more. They handle well for what they are, but they aint no Tein's.

Took that all in,everything that you say makes sense, gonna listen to you guys and stick to the teins i think haha. Plus doing a bit of research has lead me to a gtt lip that i really want, more low=bad for front lip.

Handling all the way <3

Thankyou for that buddy!

You dont go belly to the ground and expect to corner awesomely! How are race cars set up? They dont tuck rim.

You either want looooowwwww or you want perfect height for twisties. Yes there is a happy medium but what you are asking is ludicrous

I was referring solely to the fact that low cars aren't meant to be practical, in response to people saying it wouldn't be good for a daily driver. Has nothing to do with handling.

In other words, if OP wants a low car, I'm pretty sure he realises it will be shit to get around in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
×
×
  • Create New...