Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So many people hating on stance. If you don't have sound advice, hold your breathe. Your input is useless.

It's not like he's hating on how boring you all are, following the same trends with wheels, and standard ride height. etc

+1

Edited by ishyz34

Ishan to be completely honest you won't get as low as that bayside blue r34 the reason being is it has a factory bodykit including front lip and side skirt / rear pods. This makes the car look lower.

It is simply not practical as a daily drive to have it sitting like that there is no way you will get over a speed bump or drive way of any kind without causing damage.

You know how much I'm all for stance / low cars however if this was a weekend car then go for it but its not and as a daily cops will rape you it's just a matter of time.

Honestly I would want to get caught coz here in Vic as you know they won't just get you for ride height it will be a list of major defects.

I suggest getting tyre flush with guard and calling it a day any lower and it becomes hard to street as a daily car.

In order to get your car that low you will probably need a front / rear set of camber arms and a f**k load of camber with the offsets you have. Also new coilovers that can be ride height adjusted more than your teins.

Edited by DarkRyda

Lol, you know nothing. Most of us havw been there, and are telling you how stupid it is.

Lol, rookies

You're completely missing the point. Yes, it's stupid in terms of practicality.

If you're referring practicality to the stance trend though, I'm afraid you know nothing buddy.

Lol, know-it-alls

You're completely missing the point. Yes, it's stupid in terms of practicality.

If you're referring practicality to the stance trend though, I'm afraid you know nothing buddy.

Lol, know-it-alls

Hahaha. Seems like you know it all.

Kids these days

More low = More defect? Not to mention your roll centre ends up the shit wahzoo.

I'm not 'hatin' but if you lower it more you'll get your stance, but at the cost of no vehicle practicality, anal reaming from police and potentially impose handling issues.

I was going to say....if this OP will admit to wearing a flat brimmed cap, we can all just walk away and leave him to it.

Lol, mate i'm not a try hard gangster wannabe, don't worry.

More low = More defect? Not to mention your roll centre ends up the shit wahzoo.

I'm not 'hatin' but if you lower it more you'll get your stance, but at the cost of no vehicle practicality, anal reaming from police and potentially impose handling issues.

This is true, a lot of thinking to do to be honest, to go lower or to not go lower. Just need those extra couple cm's to make me happy

I'm so so happy with the ride quality, just that wheel and body gap(specifically at the rear) bugs me haha.

Yeah, the gaps minimal... If you hadn't of told us, would wouldn't have noticed...

It looks good as is!

Yeah, the gaps minimal... If you hadn't of told us, would wouldn't have noticed...

It looks good as is!

Thanks buddy :))

more neg camber?

more neg camber?

Really dont wanna destroy my tyres, negative camber already happens with my teins.

Well, the more you lower it the more you're gunna get anyway.

That is true, although i did put the car on a hoist the other day, tyres seemed in awesome knick after a good 5 months on my new wheels, maybe some extra low or negative camber wont harm it too much i reckon

A drop of about 1.5cm is all i need to be happy, maybe i'll just fill my boot with bricks?

I really don't think your car needs lowering. It looks good as it is.

Are you talking about the rear being too high in terms of wheel gap or rear bumper off the ground. Cause i'd suggest, as others have, just getting a lip and rear pods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
×
×
  • Create New...