Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nissan Skyline R33 GT-R Nismo 400R

Specifications

Engine: RBX-GT2 Inline 6 Cylinder Twin Turbo

Displacement (cc): 2,771

Bore x Stroke (mm): 87.0 x 77.7

Power: 298.3 kw / 400.0 bhp @ 6800 rpm

Torque: 470.5 nm / 347.0 ft lbs @ 4400 rpm

Top Speed: 318.7 kph

Compression Ratio: 8.5:1

R33 GT-R Nismo 400R Pictures:

R33_400r2.GIF

R33_400r.jpg

The R33 Nismo 400R is very, very, very good. Along with these awesome engine specifications, the 400R came with an aero bodykit. I don't know excatly how much one would be worth but a limited number were made, so i'm thinking in excess of $100,000, U.S Dollars. Is there any in Australia if anybody knows?

Dallas :headspin:

February 1996, the so far most potent Skyline version saw the light of day in a very limited number of only 99 pieces. The NISMO 400R was intended as a road-going version of Nissan's GT-Skylines, to celebrate the race-track-success of the NISMO GT-R LM.

Different to this, the NISMO 400R does not have rear-wheel drive, but builds up on a very improved chassis of the most sporty and powerful R33 version, the R33 GT-R V-Spec.

tuned version of the RB26DETT, the RBX-GT2 engine powers the NISMO 400R forward with 400hp at 6800rpm. A larger stroke of 77.7mm and bore of 87mm make for a larger displacement of 2771cc. Additionally, special pistons and con-rods, a new crankshaft and a strengthened engine-block, in connection with a NISMO intercooler are responsible for the increase in power and also boost torque to a maximum of 478Nm (346 lb-ft) at 4400rpm. The power is still delivered to all wheels via the 5-speed gearbox, although a twin-plate clutch now handles the connection between axle and transmission.

Further improvements over the V-Spec include a 30mm lower suspension (in comparison to the already quite low V-Spec) with Bilstein gas shocks and 18-inch wheels with 275/35 tires. In correspondence with ATTESA-ETS and Super-HICAS these changes make for a race-car-like handling that hardly any other car is likely to match.

But updated dynamics are not the only differences between the R33 and the NISMO 400R. The outward appearance of the latter already hints at the potential under hood. The front-spoiler has even bigger scoops than before, and gives the 400R an almost threatening stance on the street. The 18-inch wheels fill the wheel-housings much better than the V-Spec's 17-inch ones and the rear-wing produces even more grip than the standard one. On the passive side, NISMO brakes make sure all that forward-power is also decelerated effectively when necessary and race-style seats with harnesses keep the driver in place even during the most courageous maneuvers.

Considering the racing-heritage of this car and its huge dynamic potential, the NISMO 400R is THE race-car for the street and definitely the best Skyline available so far.

Nissan had been racing the Skyline in the GT1 category of the 24-hours endurance race of Le Mans in 1995 and 1996, so the GT-R LM and the 400R were intended as road-going versions of these race cars. Both got derivatives of the RB26DETT engine, the GT-R LM with 305hp and the 400R with 400hp. Unfortunately only one GT-R LM was built to homologate the car for racing, which is confined to a museum today.

The 400R on the other hand, got an enlarged RB26DETT engine with 2.8l of displacement, the RBX-GT2, a twin-turbo with an astonishing 400hp at 6.800rpm. The engine was not the only similarity with the GT-R though, since both cars were based upon the R33 GT-R V-spec (Victory Specification). But where the GT-R LM only got RWD (like the race-cars), the 400R got further improved GT-R technology, like ATTESA-ETS etc.

Naturally, both car’s inner potency was resembled in their design as well. Each one of them featured bigger wheels, wider spoilers and wheel-arches and lower suspension, to give them a look even more dramatic than the already not too inconspicuous standard GT-R.

In February 1996, the so far most potent Skyline version saw the light of day in a very limited number of only 99 pieces. The NISMO 400R was intended as a road-going version of Nissan's GT-Skylines, to celebrate the race-track-success of the NISMO GT-R LM...

Model NISMO 400R

General Information

Layout Front-engine / AWD

Drag Coefficient [cd] NA

Curb Weight [lb (kg)] 3418 (1550)

Trunk Space [cu ft. (L)] NA

Overall Length [in. (mm)] 184,1 (4675)

Overall Width [in. (mm)] 72.0 (1830)

Overall Height [in. (mm)] 52.4 (1330)

Wheelbase [in. (mm)] 107.1 (2720)

Track Front [in. (mm)] 59.1 (1500)

Track Rear [in. (mm)] 59.4 (1510)

Steering Rack & Pinion; Speed Sensitive Power Ass.

Turning Radius [ft. (m)] NA

Tires front 275/35 ZR18

Tires rear 275/35 ZR18

Engine

Type RBX-GT2 - Inline-6; Twin-Turbo Charged

Valvetrain dohc 4-valve/cyl

Displacement [cc] 2771

Bore & Stroke [mm] 87.0 x 77.7

Compression Ratio 8.5:1

Redline [rpm] NA

Max. Power [bhp at rpm] 400 at 6800

Max. Torque [lb-ft (Nm) at rpm] 353 (478) at 4400

Bhp/Liter 144

Gear Ratios

1st NA

2nd NA

3rd NA

4th NA

5th NA

Final drive NA

Suspension

Front Multi Link; Bilstein gas shocks

Rear Multi Link; Bilstein gas shocks

Braking

Front - Brakes NA

Rear - Brakes NA

70 - 0 mph [ft (m)] NA

60 - 0 mph [ft (m)] NA

Performance*

0 - 60 mph [secs] 4.0

0 - 100 mph [secs] NA

1/4 mile [secs at mph] NA

Top Speed [mph] 198

Google is your friend!

Mat.

i have never seen a 400r for sale in auction and i have been keeping a close eye on things for numerous years also prestige has never seen any... also there are varying conflicts on how many there where made and apperently the original purchase price was rumored at arond 12 million yen... so i couldnt see the sale price now being much less than 100,ooo AUD...

Where do you guys get your information from, ever tried reading it off Nismo's website...only 99 were ever made and cost 12Mil Yen at the time. Indeed a very rare car, you'd be lucky to find one.

http://www.nismo.co.jp/complete/400R/spec2.html

There is no such car as the BNR34 S or R-tune...they are tuning powerup packages.

S-Tune: 7,480,000 Yen (no longer available)

R-Tune: 12,600,000 Yen

S-Tune: 9,198,000 Yen (new package)

Z-Tune: it's a JGTC proto car (2,771 cc, 600ps/7,600rpm & 66kgm/5,200rpm @ 1.4bars). As you can see they basically took a N1 spec plus their experience with a the 400R. This car was suppose to be released, but never did...pity would have been an awesome car. I'm sure if you want one they will happy give you the parts list to built one.

Similarly to the Nismo S15 R-Tune, contary to what people say there is no such car, it is only a tuning package. Only Nismo Silvia complete car is the 270R...also an awesome car.

All Nismo complete cars available for public sale bar the prototypes, again can be found on their website.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...