Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Along with a few other usefull bits and pieces Ive had one of these stashed away for a few years now and I'm wondering if its worth doing with the IW GT3076R . I've been through most of the threads here to see if its worth doing for an "only" 300 RWKW engine .

Recently people like Mick o have smashed 300Kw with the std manifold so I'm wondering if going to the extra grief is worth it for me . I guess none of the available front pipes are going to work with it and I'm not going to use an external gate anyway .

It seems the dramas surround clearing the engine mount and shield with the compressor housings inlet boss and hose . One thing I picked up on is that someone , Nismoid I think , reckons RB26 engine mounts aren't as tall as RB25 ones so do we think a shorter engine mount and a spacer between it and the engine bracket would help ? Is an RB20 engine mount and bracket any better ?

The $64 question is does the HKS manifold make enough of a difference with an IW turbo to make it worth the effort ? I can see the draw if you intend to go external gate but not sure otherwise .

Wolverine do you have pics of yours in the engine mount area with the GT3076R ? I know you told me more fettling had to be done but can't remember the details .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422267-hks-rb25-exhaust-manifold-worth-it/
Share on other sites

Is there any internal size difference in the HKS manifold compared to stock?

wolverine- should I bother port/polishing the stock manifold and TS 0.82 ? My tuner told me to be careful I don't take too much off because ill loose response and it could affect the torque

Edited by AngryRBGTX

HKS manifold runners flow more than a stock manifold.

DaleFZ1 has tidied up a stock manifold to remove obvious casting dags and basic port matching (if memory serves). If you are doing it yourself and are competent with a die grinder I reckon it would be worthwhile and unlikely to harm anything unless you get medieval.

Ultimately I have no doubt that a fancy manifold can be an improvement but for a streetable turbo realistically the money spent might not be that noticeable.

^+1

If you have the tools, the time, and the inclination then I'd say there is nothing to be lost by tidying the gas flow path in the OEM manifold. The runners can be made a lot nicer, and port matching is always going to help things.

I reckon the collector/merge area is not the nicest aspect of design from a flow standpoint although some judicious work with the die grinder should bring some improvement too. If you're doing the work yourself, look at the potential to pick up 10-15kW (tops) for free.

Bottom line is that if you were paying workshop rates to get it all done to optimal levels, you have blown a proportion of the cost of a decent fabricated manifold that has a decent gas flow path and collector already.

If you happened to have a cast HKS manifold sitting in the shelves however, you would be putting it to use without thinking twice.

Does anyone know the real world performance difference of the HKS vs the OE RB25 exhaust manifold ? I mean in power or torque terms not flow numbers .

Also does anyone have pics of an RB25 engine mount next to an RB26 one to show up differences ?

Cheers A .

Oh I will add whilst there are no direct comparisons that I know of. There are loads of 6boost vs std results to show that std is sh1t house. There are a few flow bench results of HKS v 6boost that show the HKS is a very good thing...so just use it or send me your bank details...as I should never had sold mine to Wolverine ;)

Mark, your sig indicates you are in Queensland. Low mount, high mount, its all legal. No good asking people based in Vic or NSW.

Regardless of whether its a HKS, 6boost, or a stocker with internal flow improvements, they are all going to make the engine exhale more easily. The flow efficiency can allow it to make more power, respond just that little bit easier, or use a little bit less fuel in general use.

Sometimes its going to be difficult to say X manifold will result in Y kW gain, and the cost:benefit analysis is hard to make. It's not that hard to conclude though, that if your setup is spec'd and tuned to run around 300rwkW and not much more, then you could find yourself spending 500-1500 for a gain of 10kW. That's not a good return on investment at the top end of the scale.

On the upside, there have been users posting up comments indicating that the gain in response and feel/driveability do not show up on dyno sheets.

The HKS low mount is very difficult to fit. The Garrett .60 or .70 housing with a 4inch induction will sit against the engine mount. Not mentioning every thing else had to be custom made to suit.

Since doing the manifold and gate rout, better off getting a local hand made high mount item.

Do I get the feeling that this manifold was made with R32 GTSTs in mind and they used a slightly different engine bracket and engine mount style ?

Also I think these were sold in a kit with a T04E turbo that had a smaller inlet boss .

BTW I don't have the wastegate just the manifold itself .

A .

It was a kunt to fit I spent 2x days on it:

making sure every thing is all flat and surfaced.

The oil port on the turbocharger get folded under the manifold that needs special fittings.

Position of the turbocharger held is only a inch above the oil drain port. That was a real kunt trying to customize a drain adaptor and pipe that doesn't kink and that short.

Turbocharger and all related bits needs to be fitted on to the manifold before bolting it up to the head. And then I found the comp housing is hitting against the engine mount.

So I ripped every thing out and bought brae high mount manifold. Life has never been easier.

The HKS stuff when on ebay. bidding from $1.

Of course once you have the manifold installed the exhaust path out of the turbo is a lot straighter so you win somewhere and you lose somewhere.

If you are changing turbos regularly then no way you would use one.

If you have a Stagea I wouldn't recommend it due to the location of the oil drain on those blocks. Otherwise like most car modifications....it requires modifying something.

Off my own topic I suppose but is much known about this manifold from Brae ? I'd always though it was impossible to make a manifold that mounted the turbo anywhere near the std position and have it work better than the std cast iron one . They say it mounts the turbo a bit further out from the engine but with minimum changes they can be made to work .

Some of that foil type quilted heat shielding would make it look a bit less lethal but its obviously not going to factory .

http://www.braeautofab.com/apps/webstore/products/show/2941402

Will reasearch these , cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What can't be done with a little bit of decking board or similar timber bolted to a hub flange via 2 wheel nuts is not worth talking about.
    • I noticed something. On the tps sensor and the sensor behind the adjustment screw is adjusted towards the far left. Are these screws supposed to be centered? (this sensor was in the same position before the tune as well)  Also attached a photo of where my car usually idles at when warm (sometimes a tiny bit above that). I think I might have screwed up the calculation and it might have better than I thought lol at 750rpm still not 650rpm though.      
    • So for both general interest of engine health, and to rule out any coolant/oil issues, I organised an oil analysis done on the 125,000klm oil Results below, all good, just a bit of fuel dilution which I'm not too worried about
    • This is actually a really good way of measuring what wheels fit. If only there was a similar measurement between hub face and suspension :p That said, it's probably pretty simple to actually measure it all with the wheel off the car for the rear. The front is a bit more complex but.. 
    • Being the top Google search result for R34 wheel-related inquiries, lemme throw down my experience. I calculated that 100mm from hub face to wheel face is about the perfect fitment for my ENR34 sedan.  I've been running 18x8.5s, ET35, with a 1" spacer. So, 8.5in to mm = 216mm. 216/2 = 108mm. 108-35 = 73mm. 73+ 25 (1" to mm) = 98mm.  If you wanna get close to this on dif widths, here are the offsets you'll want: 9" - ET around 15mm 9.5" - ET around 20mm 10" - you're crazy, but ET around 30mm All these should fit perfectly on a non-widebody, non-GTR Skyline. Note that it's probably the absolute max, and you're probably better off running a couple degrees of camber in this config, but it looks great, super flush.
×
×
  • Create New...