Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

Up for sale is my Black GT-R 34 v-spec rolling shell all complete with out engine, intercooler ecu etc.

This car has been my pride and joy very sad to see it go. Would Suit someone with a built engine, can just put it in and drive away.

Car is still registered.

No damage.

Has a few goodies like black NUR seats, Ohlins suspension, Nismo Dash, Z tune front bar, Nismo indicators, Walbro fuel pump, custom aluminium Diffuser.

$28,500 with gearbox.

$25,000 with out.

Pick Up Mulgrave Victoria.

txt 0411 547 338 no swaps!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422421-gt-r-34-rolling-shell/
Share on other sites

Hi, I am the previous owner of this GTR.

I was also the 'buyer' who had a deal worked out with Ross. Anyway, after telling me it was mine to buy, and agreeing that he would pick up a deposit tomorrow, I later found out he was still taking offers without my knowledge. Because of this, I will not be buying it.

For those who are Interested, please contact me on 0402 611 670 for a full history of the car.

Thanks

Vu

Haha VU wouldn't think you'd go so low. A deal is not a deal unless the money is in hand. I got a better deal and told you about it and said I would get back to you tonight. I think I was very fair, anyone in my position would have taken a better offer seeming as I am in the position of a blown engine. I think your way of going about it is very immature and is respective of how malicious you are a true back stabber. Thanks bud and yes your shop is an absolute joke have to take things back 3 times to get them painted properly.

Haha VU wouldn't think you'd go so low. A deal is not a deal unless the money is in hand. I got a better deal and told you about it and said I would get back to you tonight. I think I was very fair, anyone in my position would have taken a better offer seeming as I am in the position of a blown engine. I think your way of going about it is very immature and is respective of how malicious you are a true back stabber. Thanks bud and yes your shop is an absolute joke have to take things back 3 times to get them painted properly.

Once you can't trust a man's word - what's left? From what I understand of the situation it would have been better to say from the start that you would prefer to wait for a better off than set false expectations.

Either way for somebody who is claiming to be all high and mighty - it's awfully unbecoming to personally attack and then defame a person's business don't you think?

Someone who has gone out of there way at 7pm at night to write a message of malicious intentions deserves nothing else! And Vu why don't you explain the full history of the car you've never told me? You have place on here go play some more computer games!

I don't see how I am the immature backstabber, you agreed to the terms and were willing to pick up a deposit. Everyone can see you posted 'Sold' in this thread, was I wrong to think this constitutes a 'deal' ?

Either way, I just posted in this thread for interested buyers to contact me as I am the previous owner. There is no malicious intent.

Like I've said there was nothing in writing and no hand over in cash I am entitled to refuse a deal. "Because of this I would not buy it" - no intention huh? I have had another offer I would have probably tried to work something out with you. But to late for that!

A deal is a deal Ross - whether verbal or written, whether deposit taken or not. Legally Vu is 100% in the right - go read up on contract law. Very bad form. And I am leaving all this here for the world to see - you reporting it asking the comments to be deleted is bs.

As stated, a man is only as good as their word - and it would seem yours is not good.

Wow wow wow... Watch your words here Ross, don't act all mighty behind your screen there because majority of us know that you're daddy's little boy who gets whatever he wants when he goes and begs daddy for it. I've never met you personally but I can tell you now that you're not going to get far with your life going by what I've heard from people. You need to be taught some respect because its quite obvious that you're just a spoilt brat!

How dare you attack another mans business, do you think DT Panals would have the reputation it has if it is as bad as you say it is? I think not bud. Remember the R34 that's in your DP was once Vu's, although you bought it of him

and tried your hardest to try and make it look like a different car eg painting the rims greens, I have to say you do not deserve to own a Japanese icon, you my friend have daddy's money but no brains. Vu has a lot of respect from

many people, why? Because he is a loyal man who works hard and is known for his quality, unlike you. So if I were you I'd be watching who you're attacking bud.

PS built not bought... Stop commenting and trying to take credit on photos via FB everytime a page posts up a photo of how the car looked when Vu sold it, because you never made it look that way and I wish Vu never sold the car to you because you truly do not deserve a master piece.

Ill see you around with your blown motor mr no brainier.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...