Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Just wondering which one should cost more, a modded GTR or a stock GTR.

I have been told that it is good to get a GTR that has not had its engine opened...but again, getting a modded GTR means you get all the goodies...

Which one is the best to go for?

Thanks all.

Lav

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422426-mod-vs-stock-gtr/
Share on other sites

I spent a long time looking for a stock example, in the hope that it has had an easier life.

Paid a premium compred to what worked R34 GTR's would have cost me at the time, however I was more so after condition, rather than a half complete jig saw puzzle.

f**k that. Look for one that's been done properly, a searchable history, all the receipts, and where the car is known by a lot of people. Buying stock to just waste your life and money modifying with no return is not a good choice IMO. Find one done and done properly.

f**k that. Look for one that's been done properly, a searchable history, all the receipts, and where the car is known by a lot of people. Buying stock to just waste your life and money modifying with no return is not a good choice IMO. Find one done and done properly.

Amen to that. Saved myself a lot of money and hassle buying a modded car that was well looked after and getting it how I like it, rather than doing it myself. So it all comes down to what your plans are.

Also for the record, I really dont reckon km's are a gauge of condition.

different views...interesting...

i guess getting a modded one is valuable for the money and effort to run around and doing it on ur own but getting a stock one and do it up yourself is good as you know what you did and the parts you used, plus where it was done...

will like to know how many will go for modded vs stock...

Chime in to say I looked for stock because I wanted to reduce the risks and mod at my pace. Buying a modded one means you take the risks associated assuming it has been done correctly. Also, a modded car normally needs more attention and ongoing maintenance, attracts sometimes unwanted attention, and insurance issues.

In saying that I have kept my car the same as I bought it as I just can't bring myself to ruin her :)

A stock 32 would be worth more than a modded one I'd say these days.

Simple question; are you eventually going to modify the car or are you going to keep it stock for as long as you own it?

If the latter, buy stock. If the former, buy modified. Modifications add up farking quick when you do them yourself. Before you know it, you'll have spent what the car cost you, on mods alone. Whatever extra maintenance or repairs are involved in an already modified vehicle will pale in comparison to the cost of getting it there in the first place. Ask anyone who has poured thousands into their cars - they (myself included) will tell you that, if they could go back, they'd buy an already modified example. It's just not worth it in the end and only when your priorities change do you realise this.

Remember that a lot of people selling modified cars are just like you...these cars are their babies...so it does not necessarily mean the car has been thrashed or there's something wrong with it. People get bored and move on in life. I've had friends pick up absolute bargains over the years (220fwkw N14 pulsars for a few grand etc). On the contrary, if the modifications have been done correctly (poly suspension bushes for example), they can save you repairs you would have otherwise had to do on a stock vehicle.

Whatever you choose, just get it inspected thoroughly and try to find out as much info as you can. Buying from someone on SAU is a good start, as often you can find threads they've made about the car for repairs and modifications; see the history etc.

There is no way a stock GTR, that is going to be driven (ie non collectable) should be worth more than a modded car with a similar service history and condition.

There are very few 'stock' GTR's. If it 'looks' stock, it likely hasn't been in the past. Not always, but very likely.

It's no brainer, buy modified over stock any day.

If you chose to go stock route, thing breaks, you end up modify it anyway. May as well buy off someone after they'd pour $$$ on it before moving on and you just enjoy it.

I'd say make a choice based on what you want the car for.

If I wanted a toy, or track car, I'd be looking at something pre-modded.

Whereas I wanted a clean daily, so I went for a pretty stock option.

Also depends on yourself... I enjoy doing as much on my car as I can and learning in the process, whereas some mates aren't fussed and would prefer to pay a shop to mod.

Stock car has more chance of being reliable than a modded car if that matters to you.

That's a very broad statement. Stock cars can be even more unreliable, it's whether the car is looked after that determines the cars reliability. Not what mods it had.

Assumes that all stock cars are reliable / have been taken care of^

What if the car has been returned to standard for sale (as is the case with a lot of "never boosted" cars)? You wouldn't be able to tell the difference. So not only do you have the "unreliability" of a modified vehicle, but none of the bonus mods to go with it. And you probably paid more for an "unmolested" example ;)

People who buy 15-20 year old stock cars thinking they're more reliable than modified probably also believe the 80,000km on the dash are legitimate too, lol

That's a very broad statement. Stock cars can be even more unreliable, it's whether the car is looked after that determines the cars reliability. Not what mods it had.

This. Get any car checked out. Investigate any mods. My car is heavily modified and in perfect running order; better mechanical condition than 90% of GTS-T out there. There's 6-7k in bolt on mods alone, that could be removed and sold if you wanted it factory again. You'd be an idiot to pick a standard example over it, if both were going for the same price.

I've always bought close to stock and modded myself, that way you can do what you want and how you want it.

sure its going to work out more in the long run, but you can have it set how you want, parts you want.

at the end its down to personal preference..

and on stock being more reliable.. remember the JUN R33 lemon - clarkson drove it and mentioned it had never once broken down.. that thing was modded as much as you can get..

in my opinion you can normally pick up a stock one cheaper also.

though if you want to go the modded route and save $$ - buy already modded i guess..

defintly get a modded gtr. as long as compression test comes up good and no leaks youve got yourself a freak. ive seen cars thrashed for years and still going. then a car babied all its life then a bit of boost. nek minnit. fail

condition of body is most important

Oooo such an easy question to answer... if you plan to modify it, just go talk to any gtr owner - theyll tell you to buy a clean one that's already modified. You'll save a truckload of cash. I once read that you couldn't afford to own a GTR unless you could afford to buy 2. I've owned mine for 10 months, bought it with some clean mods and already spent another 20k on it which I'll never see again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...