Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 04/04/2013 at 3:37 AM, turbodragon said:

Oh...... well...... this is awkward then...... :unsure:

Hahaha yeah I am actually. Being in possession of a 6L SS-V throw you off the scent did it? ;)

No, not really, it is actually very Asian to argue over $41 though LOL

  On 04/04/2013 at 4:12 AM, Sunkist said:

Thoity? That's fkn US Jew..

It's sertee fo

I have no idea what you're talking about...you can't explain that.

Type up a letter, outlining it all - and providing all the evidence to the contrary. Documented evidence etc.

At the end of the letter simply state that as it is ILLEGAL to make a FALSE report - and as such, you will not be taking the car in.

They should then drop it.

  On 04/04/2013 at 11:59 AM, R31Nismoid said:

Type up a letter, outlining it all - and providing all the evidence to the contrary. Documented evidence etc.

At the end of the letter simply state that as it is ILLEGAL to make a FALSE report - and as such, you will not be taking the car in.

They should then drop it.

And then do the EPA car park dobbing

  On 04/04/2013 at 11:59 AM, R31Nismoid said:

Type up a letter, outlining it all - and providing all the evidence to the contrary. Documented evidence etc.

At the end of the letter simply state that as it is ILLEGAL to make a FALSE report - and as such, you will not be taking the car in.

They should then drop it.

This. I find it ridiculous that you would even contemplate doing the test knowing well and truly your innocent.

Request to talk to management, the dummies on the phones dont know nothing about anything outside their normal work protocol/procedure.

  On 04/04/2013 at 11:59 AM, R31Nismoid said:

Type up a letter, outlining it all - and providing all the evidence to the contrary. Documented evidence etc.

At the end of the letter simply state that as it is ILLEGAL to make a FALSE report - and as such, you will not be taking the car in.

They should then drop it.

Thanks mate. I've sent an email explaining the situation, attached with all the documents to support the fact I was not present at time of apparent sighting.

I will write a formal letter should a resolution not be reached after email and phone call.

  On 04/04/2013 at 1:37 PM, Sunkist said:

And then do the EPA car park dobbing

Hahahahahaha always provides the lulz.

Best case scenario: they drop the letter and we go EPA car park dobbing

Worst case scenario: we go EPA car park dobbing

  On 04/04/2013 at 8:04 PM, nomnomv8 said:

This. I find it ridiculous that you would even contemplate doing the test knowing well and truly your innocent.

Request to talk to management, the dummies on the phones dont know nothing about anything outside their normal work protocol/procedure.

Well that's my exact train of thought. Why do the imte if I hadn't done the crime? Like someone mentioned previously, it's like putting someone in jail PRIOR to having evidence against them.

Will def be talking to someone higher up if my email doesn't get a satisfactory response.

And even when you get a satisfactory response, complain, find out and ask for a letter of apology from the person that incorrectly reported you for wasting your time and stress provided.

That way the person or police officer will think twice about willy nilly just reporting number plates

  On 04/04/2013 at 10:36 PM, blah_blah said:

And even when you get a satisfactory response, complain, find out and ask for a letter of apology from the person that incorrectly reported you for wasting your time and stress provided.

That way the person or police officer will think twice about willy nilly just reporting number plates

Chances of a letter of apology from EPA and Vic Police will be virtually impossible BUT, if I ever did get one, I would frame it and cherish it forever.

  On 05/04/2013 at 12:05 AM, Basti said:

Email is just as valid as a typed and printed letter. So if you write a snail mail version, be angrier

Too true. Since I've been accused of being a tight ass asian, I might as well get angrier in the letter since it would've cost me about an extra $0.45 for the paper and about $0.60 for the stamp. Do noise test for $42? NO BLOODY WAY!!

  On 04/04/2013 at 3:01 AM, Birds said:

Farkin awesome^

Reminds me of that story about the cop who pulled over a work cover OH&S officer on a freeway and fined him for something negligible, then got a fine himself for not wearing high vis vest on a freeway...or something to that effect.

Rofl

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I鈥檒l buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
  • Create New...