Falsely Accused Of Excessive Noise?

[GTR-N1]

  On 04/04/2013 at 3:39 AM, Sunkist said:

No, not really, it is actually very Asian to argue over $41 though LOL

For fear of embezzlement, that's why SAU.NSW has never had an Asian Treasurer LOL

[tranman]

Can we cut out the useless Asian jokes? There were some valid commentary and extremely good points raised. Funny posts regarding EPA carpark dobbing which I'm all for to give those in the system a taste of their own.

But if you insist on the race jokes why don't we just move on and make some comments about Africans. Greek? No Italian. I'm not sure it's hard to make up my mind since there's Afghans, Jews, and half-casts in between. I'm a bit spoilt for choice but I guess that's one of the privileges I have living in a multi-cultural society.

Don't forget ur mum either....

[Birds]

lol what are you on about...everyone's race cops a beating here. It's the reason we all get along so well. You can bag mine if you can work out where the f**k I come from!

[tranman]

Maybe this thread should be called "falsely accused of racism"

[Basti]

  On 05/04/2013 at 9:53 AM, Birds said:

lol what are you on about...everyone's race cops a beating here. It's the reason we all get along so well. You can bag mine if you can work out where the f**k I come from!

Equestria. Why the long face?

[tranman]

  On 05/04/2013 at 11:12 AM, Basti said:

Equestria. Why the long face?

Lmao. Nice one Basti, tactfully done. Apologies if i'm quick with the trigger. Last fortnight I did humanity an injustice because I kept silent so as to be 'agreeable' to a group of people i just met. But that's my problem. Cheers.

Edited April 5, 2013 by tranman

[Birds]

  On 05/04/2013 at 11:12 AM, Basti said:

Equestria. Why the long face?

http://youtu.be/jhpT5JApd5U

Cause Derpy just ain't the same

[GTR-N1]

  On 05/04/2013 at 10:15 AM, tranman said:

Maybe this thread should be called "falsely accused of racism"

Not to worry.

Birds knows already that when walking in an area with Asian drivers, he stays off the footpath.

[Birds]

I thought even Asians embraced that rule^ haha

[xALmoN]

that's why we all walk willy nilly everywhere except on the footpath.

[GTR-N1]

...and so, that's how we became known as 'dodgy'?

[Sunkist]

Asians....

Asians everywhere

[GTR-N1]

Yes we are...

But N. Korean cousins have long been disowned.

[Plattsy]

im not racist i have a colour television.

[T.D]

Bit of an update:

Got home and was greeted with a letter from EPA and thought "Cool, maybe they've grown some logic and are withdrawing the original test notice".

Low and behold, what I read disgustted me. Basically, the letter read "The time of 2:22pm should read 4:20pm".

Now, this is the part that annoys me because in my email, I outlined to them my exact movements and what time. They basically taken note of what I wrote to them and then changed the time of apparent infringement to suit them!!

Obviously I was in the area at the time of 4:45pm (DUH! I wrote to you in the email saying I was there!) BUT not even close to the road/time I was apparently spotted on!

My faith in EPA has well and truly been lost. "Disgraceful" is the only word I can think, knowing they are more than willing to pull off a stunt like changing times around AFTER I emailed them with my location/wehereabouts.

Edited April 8, 2013 by turbodragon

[Plattsy]

  On 08/04/2013 at 12:44 AM, turbodragon said:

Bit of an update:

Got home and was greeted with a letter from EPA and thought "Cool, maybe they've grown some logic and are withdrawing the original test notice".

Low and behold, what I read disgustted me. Basically, the letter read "The time of 2:22pm should read 4:20pm".

Now, this is the part that annoys me because in my email, I outlined to them my exact movements and what time. They basically taken note of what I wrote to them and then changed the time of apparent infringement to suit them!!

Obviously I was in the area at the time of 4:45pm (DUH! I wrote to you in the email saying I was there!) BUT not even close to the road/time I was apparently spotted on!

My faith in EPA has well and truly been lost. "Disgraceful" is the only word I can think, knowing they are more than willing to pull off a stunt like changing times around AFTER I emailed them with my location/wehereabouts.

even more reason to fight it mate.

time to get the press involved.

[Odium]

Does the report say the name of the officer who reported you?

If so, go to the station and ask if you can talk to them, or organise a time to speak to them....

Then say "This report says that I was here at 2:22pm, is it possible that you've gotten the time wrong, because I wasn't even in this part of melbourne at the time."

He'll of course say "No, that is correct, I spotted you at 2:22pm at xxxxxxx", reading back the details of the first report.

Boom, conflicting information, and a bullshit "amendment" from EPA...

Will be enough to get it cancelled.

[Frosty]

LOL WTF happened to that post....

SAVED!

Edited April 8, 2013 by Frosty

[T.D]

  On 08/04/2013 at 1:22 AM, Plattsy said:

even more reason to fight it mate.

time to get the press involved.

You really love getting the press involved huh? LOL

  On 08/04/2013 at 1:32 AM, Odium said:

Does the report say the name of the officer who reported you?

If so, go to the station and ask if you can talk to them, or organise a time to speak to them....

Then say "This report says that I was here at 2:22pm, is it possible that you've gotten the time wrong, because I wasn't even in this part of melbourne at the time."

He'll of course say "No, that is correct, I spotted you at 2:22pm at xxxxxxx", reading back the details of the first report.

Boom, conflicting information, and a bullshit "amendment" from EPA...

Will be enough to get it cancelled.

Nope, no name. I've tried since day one to get the name of reporting officer so I could have a chat to him and see where the error has occured. Unfortunatly, EPA continue to withhold the name of the officer for some reason or another.

If I was able to get the officer's name, I would no doubt follow the path you mentioned as the two conflicting stories will raise alarm bells. Hopefully the officer isn't in on it also. EPA = Untrustworthy!

[Plattsy]

  On 08/04/2013 at 1:36 AM, turbodragon said:

You really love getting the press involved huh? LOL

Nope, no name. I've tried since day one to get the name of reporting officer so I could have a chat to him and see where the error has occured. Unfortunatly, EPA continue to withhold the name of the officer for some reason or another.

If I was able to get the officer's name, I would no doubt follow the path you mentioned as the two conflicting stories will raise alarm bells. Hopefully the officer isn't in on it also. EPA = Untrustworthy!

deffo mate. bring it to light. you have to knowledge and what not, what bout people who would just do it because they wouldnt know any better. get the story out there my friend!