Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am looking to do a single turbo swap for my RB26, but Im not really chasing big power, even stock power or little over stock is okay, Im mainly concerend with responce and having a broad power band. and also the simplicity of a single turbo and accesability appeals to me. (working on the GTR is painfull compared to the GTST)

I was wondering how would the RB26 respond to a small single turbo, enough that it will spool very early and not choke out at the redline. Is something like a single GT28 turbo feasable? or even borgwarner's EFR series? (6758 or 7064).

Or am I wrong for thinking that a small single setup would be much more responsive then a small twin? (2530s for example).

We will asume that the motor is going have a stock head and stock bottom end.

Thank you for your time and knowledge.

Edited by Idon28
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423317-small-single-options-rb26/
Share on other sites

erm... from my limited knowledge on the RB26... the stock twin piping is fairly simple compared to say a Supra's or a RX7's and u can replace the turbos with silghtly bigger ones which will give u damn good response and power..

most ppl go for single setup because of the huge power and big single turbo that cant fit in the existing space. so IMO going for single but yet small turbo...wouldnt really make much sense rite? remember.. for single turbo, u are feeding 6 cylinders...and not 3 now. =)

remember.. for single turbo, u are feeding 6 cylinders...and not 3 now. =)

Thats what I'm getting at. With 3 cylinders per turbo, that makes for 1.3L displacement per turbine.

Wont driving a turbine with 2.6L worth of exhaust flow (The whole engine) result in faster spool up on a properly sized turbine as opposed to two small turbos driven by 1.3L each?

Imagine twice the exhaust flow for single turbo instead of having to split it up for two.

The larger compressor can probably be matched to compensate for the airflow the twins did.

Edited by Idon28

yes u are right in mentioning abt exhaust flow feeding the turbine. however there are some real life physical limitations to consider....

exhaust flow and ability to compress air is not infinite nor are they linearly proportional throughout. there is an optimal amount of exhaust flow for every turbo such that once u exceed it, even if u give the turbo more exhaust, it can only spin that fast and compress that much air.

thus ppl go experimenting with hybrid turbos... switching and swapping compressors and turbines.

hope u find that sweet spot with the compressor and turbine for your purpose :)

Thats what I'm getting at. With 3 cylinders per turbo, that makes for 1.3L displacement per turbine.

Wont driving a turbine with 2.6L worth of exhaust flow (The whole engine) result in faster spool up on a properly sized turbine as opposed to two small turbos driven by 1.3L each?

Imagine twice the exhaust flow for single turbo instead of having to split it up for two.

The larger compressor can probably be matched to compensate for the airflow the twins did.

If you put on a small single the engine will spool very quickly buy make very little power (much less than stock). There is no free lunch, whether single or twins you trade off spool for power. If you wanted max spool out of an RB26 you would get the stock turbos rebuild with steel wheels and get about 280kw.

I would suggest going with the likes of a FP HTA 3076 or 3582 as they are known to spool pretty early but still produce big power........ Inb4 Lithium :P

Lol you can't send me to this thread and then say that :P

Seems like quite a bit of work to go to, but the likes of an EFR7064 on a twin scroll manifold would be immensely impressive on an RB26 in terms of spool and response - and should be capable of respectable power too, more power than the stock turbos but not much and in no way comparable with GT2530s in power.

I personally wouldn't go with anything smaller than a EFR7670 (or a FP3076HTA like what R34Geeteetee suggested) on an RB26 - the spool of those units would still be at worst comparable with the stock turbos, or much better than GT2530s but still give a good power improvement... just not as much as much as GT2530s, probably half way between the stockers and GT2530s.

If you want to compare flow wise with GT2530s then you really need to be looking at things like an EFR8374 or FP3582HTA which will spool a lot closer to the GT2530 (still more responsive).

  • 2 months later...

Sorry to revive this thread, but I had a further question. I've decided on the gameplan, the RB26 unit won't be going into an R chasis, but into something much lighter, so high horse is no longer a requirement. So with the power goal of 300HP (220KW). which turbo would give me that goal with the earliest fastest spool? the 6258 or 6758? those have the same exhaust housing, just different compressors (the 67 is bigger, and I think that will be needed to achive that power level with a single). Or will that 64 AR housing be way too restrictive, and should I go with the slightly bigger 7064 turbo? (either .83ar or 92ar housing, would they be about the same? with the 92 bieng twin scroll and the 83 bieng single entry?)

I would almost think an N/A RB30/26 would be the way to go, but I would like to have some upgradabity and low expense, so I think a turbo is the more logical choice.

Thank you.

Edited by Idon28

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I much prefer that to an actual oil pressure issue, never would of thought it would of been a volt drop issue but SAU brains win again. Guess ill be turning down the oil pressure limit for the track and hunting some grounds. Ill hopefully update this thread with some high oil pressure and solid ecu voltage logs. 
    • You've just discovered a really good reason to tell yourself, yes, I do need to buy an aftermarket ECU. Put the MAF in the bin. Slap in the new ECU and have a think about what turbo sounds you prefer.  Do you want a 90's style BOV wooosh? Do you want a hektik tsututututu?  Mate, can't go wrong. Just gotta get that ECU and the world is your oyster. 
    • Hi. Iam just curisou about this topic. I saw this video. It is about Greddy Type FV2. I know that BoVs are about that sound but how and when to use it? I read some topic here and from what i have understand on stock RB with MAF there will be some "problems" if you use this BoV? It vents the air in to the atmosphere and the MAF on stock car needs this air back in to the intake and not out? Or is it wrong? If so...i saw you can put some adaptor to circule air back...but does that not "loose" that sound? I saw another BoV from Turbosmart and it has two "exhaust" like ports? One is for the stock tubing for letting air back and one is for "sound" and let the air in the atmosphere? Can someone please explain? This is the Greddy one:  And this is the Turbosmart.     THANK YOU!! EDIT: So i read about this topic some more and i if i understand that correctly: That Greddy can function either like BoV or 100% Bypass valve? And that Turbosmart is what they called hybrid so you can adjust what and how many air can be vented out or back in? Is this right? THX!
    • That dirty voltage drop is the culprit I suspect 
    • i cant get them all in 1 screenshot unfortunately as i just dont know how to move things around tbh, but they are all from the same log and the line crosses at the same point for all of them
×
×
  • Create New...