Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ah sorry boys sounded a bit dumb what I said there I was running penrite sin and switched to royal purple! Mate it's done alot for me car it's runs way smoother, revs better, comes on boost way faster, just changed the whole way the car is! U will know what I mean when and if u try it it runs MAD! Now

regardless of the OP's lack of explanation..royal purple produce great oils. Using them in my gearbox and diff's - performing great.

Although the one hate i do have with them, is the dark colour of the oil makes it hard to tell if the oil is getting contamintated by something.

Edited by wedge_r34gtr

the question i would put to you is how often do you change you oil if going from one oil to another made that much difference

I change the oil in yhe missus mazda every 10k as per schedule, went from penrite every day synthetic to motul 8100, felt better instantly.

felt crisper, slightly up on power.

I was actually surprised.

Ah sorry boys sounded a bit dumb what I said there I was running penrite sin and switched to royal purple! Mate it's done alot for me car it's runs way smoother, revs better, comes on boost way faster, just changed the whole way the car is! U will know what I mean when and if u try it it runs MAD! Now

Penrite Synthetic what?

All the things you have mentioned point to the fact you probably went to a less viscous oil. I could achieve similar by purchasing no name oil with a lower viscosity.

This guy smells like Sheene the infamous sau ganster rapper, that cuts like chuuudder. He has bumped all his fav threads, and has the same prose. Aka, Onefaster26, and Sheene Ellis, the starter of what turned into the red head thread. Also likes starting similar mind numbing threads.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duh... to answer my own silly question, it's actually described in the FSM... ...400 pages away at the end of the manual, for RB25DE/DET signal descriptions, it cites the TPSwitch signal action, is dependent on the TPSensor value ~ this tends to infer the builtin POT voltage signal is the primary, and the switches are fallback/secondary should the POT fail/TPSensor signal lost (and switch alone with no TPSensor signal allows for base idle speed setting).... makes sense... they (TPS units) used to fail/wear the POT with time, they're not exactly built to last ~ having the switch as a redundancy gets around this...(or, it's less likely both signals would be lost as they're on different power rails)... and of course wrt RB26DETT, you have to electrically disconnect the IACV solenoid from the harness, to defeat idle air control...  
    • Dose is unaware just how much fun 145-150kw would be in a 2.5L NC MX5. It would be one of the most fun things to drive to ever grace SAU.
    • Same thought crossed my mind ~ depends on how one connotes 'stalling'...ie; gets a rough/stumbling idle as it get warm until it stalls... or... idles ok and simply falls-over when it gets to temp... ...you can test the whole circuit with a couple of resistors ...unplug coolant temp sensor, bridge terminals with a 2K7 resistor (ECU will do cold start), or with engine warm bridge with a 330R resistor (ECU will consider engine to be at normal operating temp)...it's a quick way to check wiring integrity/ECU response when you don't have a multimeter handy ...
    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
×
×
  • Create New...