Jump to content
SAU Community

Intercooler Piping Accessorie Locations

5ky-lin3
 Share

Recommended Posts

5ky-lin3 Collaborator

5ky-lin3

Posted
Posted

Hey guys,

I'm about to get some intercooler piping made up for my r33 rb25det and just want to confirm some things.

Because I have fitted a forward facing plenum and new turbo I'm planning on shifting the afm to the piping ( throttle body side) and will also have on that same piping from the intercooler to the throttle body the BOV, spot for water meth injection and a spot for the ACC valve from the plenum. Things will be tight so not sure as yet if the AFM will definitely be relocated but that's the plan. However I need to confirm what order these 4 things go in and the spacing. At the moment I think it would go in this order (being closest to throttle body first and close the intercooler last): water meth (80mm from TB), ACC (100mm from TB), BOV (200-300mm from TB), AFM (close to intercooler as possible).

If this is not correct please let me know. Any help is much appreciated.

Cheers

GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted

That would not be correct. You would want the AFM to be downstream of the BOV. Otherwise, with the arrangement you've listed, your AFM will register the flow of air through the BOV as the turbo-intercooler volume vents through the AFM towards the BOV (and then probably measure it again as it goes around again, and maybe again!).

I hope you've got a programmable ECU or it's going to be a world of pain with the AFM in the pipework otherwise.

5ky-lin3 Collaborator

5ky-lin3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That makes sense that the AFM should be on the throttle body side of the BOV adaptor..

Yeah I have a PFC. Doesn't make a difference if the BOV was plumb back or athmospheric does it?

5ky-lin3 Collaborator

5ky-lin3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So the original way is correct if its to atmo? Being BOV throttle body side of AFM?

Air that is lost to atmo that has been measured by the afm already can be tuned to compensate?

GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted

No, when I said "the above arrangement", I meant the arrangement immediately above, not the arrangement most above. That's a standard form for referencing such things.

To specifically answer your question, you do not want to vent any air, ever, that has passed through the AFM to any other position than downstream of the AFM. To phrase that another way, if the BOV is downstream the AFM, then the return must also be downstream the AFM. If you vent it out to atmosphere after the AFM, the ECU sees it as air that needs fuel and you get rich shenanigans.

ARTZ Grand Master

ARTZ

Posted
Posted

intercooler > afm > bov (vent to atmo or turbo intake) > WMI > throttle body

I dont think it will matter so much with the afm that close to the throttle body cause it will re-read any incoming air...there is not enough caught up in intake piping between AFM and TB to make a difference..its probably easier to just have an atmo bov...

not sure i liek the idea of the WMI and AFM being so close together though...any reason you cant leave the AFM in fornt of the turbo?

5ky-lin3 Collaborator

5ky-lin3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just want the Afm in the piping so I don't have to put a restrictor on the turbo intake. Even though it would effect it bugger all I think it'd look a little clear being the same size all the way to the filter.

Would it be easiest to just have the AFM throttle body side of cooler and have BOV turbo side and vent it back to intake piping?

5ky-lin3 Collaborator

5ky-lin3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Has anyone placed the BOV turbo side? I figure it would be ok if it was venting atmo cause it would be disposing hot air and if it were plumb back would be better on the cold side to recirculate the cold air back

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • joshuaho96
      Front LSD Quaife , how streetable ?- QDF3L Owners

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • Kinkstaah
      The FD RX7 is the best looking 90's JDM car

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • GTSBoy
      The FD RX7 is the best looking 90's JDM car

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • GTSBoy
      The FD RX7 is the best looking 90's JDM car

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • PLYNX
      The FD RX7 is the best looking 90's JDM car

      By PLYNX · Posted

      Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
×
×
  • Create New...