Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As gay as it sounds, I need to turn the boost down on my R33 GTR. Its my first GTR and im still getting to know all the biz about them. It's hitting 17psi and running the standard turbos. Surely this can't be good! Basic run down of mods are power fc, air filters, full exhaust (standard dump pipes) and from what I believe, the 'free boost upgrade'. I had a look on the boost solenoid and the is no yellow line on the black hose which leads me to believe the hose has been changed? What would be the easiest way to bring the boost down? I was thinking of putting in a bleed valve to get me by or even put in a ebc (which i prefer). I plan on changing the turbos down the track but have other priorities right now and will have to wait a bit hence why I want it to last a bit.

Your help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

George

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/424751-help-me-bring-my-boost-down/
Share on other sites

clearly there is already a bleed valve or ebc to get it to 17psi and tune to suit. im guessing you have just bought a car without knowing what aftermarket parts controls its boost??? maybe the power fc ebc kit. remove the vac line from the controller and plumb them straight to the wastegate, if you lower your boost a lot you will run quite rich when the tune expects 17psi and gets 10psi

Edited by Jayden.K

Thanks for the info. Yes, i have just bought the car a few weeks ago. It definitely looks as if there is no boost controller of any kind. Still retains all the factory lines from the actuators etc to the factory boost solenoid. When you say remove the line from the controller and plumb it to the actuators, are you referring to the 2 boost solenoid hoses? ie. join them together?

Thanks

George

ok. decided to go out in this cold melbourne weather and have a look around. there is no aftermarket boost control kit or pfc ebc kit. what i did find was interesting though. i pulled off one of the lines found a bolt in one and thought...oh no...and on closer inspection, there was some holes in the actuator line. i pulled the other one off aswell and that was blocked off too. i pulled the bolts out and have connected them to the solenoid so it works as it should. It now runs 12psi @ WOT which im much happier with. it boosts much better, comes on boost quicker and drives better. its a tad slower as the boost has dropped, but i think this is better. attached are some pics. if you have any other ideas on what i could do, please tell me! haha.

IMG_0212_zps7a173456.jpg

IMG_0214_zps02d95e6a.jpg

IMG_0215_zps810a9557.jpg

that is some crazy dodgy work lol. now that the boost is lower it wont feel very quick puling from 5 to 8 grand. plus it maybe running rich now which will bog it down, so when it use to see over 12psi it will add fuel to compensate (aka thats it tuned) now the airflow isnt there, its just waking fuel in for 17psi of boost when there is only 12. fact is if you have a pfc, you must get it tuned when you change things like this

Edited by Jayden.K

also sense you have a hole in your vac line. it will pay to get your boost leaks check. it will run so much better if you fix any. do this before you tune again. otherwise it will run lean if tuned with leaks, then you decide to fix them

Jayden.K - Thanks heaps for your input. I wasn't too sure if the air/maps are locked in the PFC which sounds like it is. I've just been cruising it and not taking it past 5k as it doesn't really have much pull from there onwards. It sort of flat spots. It definitely runs better they way it is set up now and i have replaced that hose with the holes in it and have gone over the vac lines and have not found any vacuum leaks. Looks like im going to book it in for a tune really soon then :)

to easy mate, btw vac leaks and boost leaks are 2 different things but if you have a leak at vac you will with pressure. you will need a pressure tester to put into your intake, force air in and when you close the valve you will hear air coming out in all sorts of places, i had no leaks at 5 psi but then leaks at 20psi. things like hose clamps/ split hoses, gaskets etc. then after there fix, it will pay to check it every 6 months or whatever. ask your tuner if they can perform this, if they dont no what your on about get another tuner.

maps are locked, unless at hot idle or cruising then it switches to closed loop and reads the o2 to calculate a/f ratio.

its really shit because if the car knocks, it doesn't retard timing. it just follows the map!!! something that comes in handy on steep inclines, burnouts and hot days which shoot knock readings up from engine load. not sure if other ecus do it like vipec/haltec, motec, wolf v2, nistune piggy back blah blah

Edited by Jayden.K
  • Like 1

that is some crazy dodgy work lol. now that the boost is lower it wont feel very quick puling from 5 to 8 grand. plus it maybe running rich now which will bog it down, so when it use to see over 12psi it will add fuel to compensate (aka thats it tuned) now the airflow isnt there, its just waking fuel in for 17psi of boost when there is only 12. fact is if you have a pfc, you must get it tuned when you change things like this

What?

Dropping the boost won't make it run rich. if it is tuned for 17, it can obviously run 12, because it would have been with part throttle. The afm will read the airflow and add the correct amount of fuel, less boost, less afm voltage, less fuel.

What?

Dropping the boost won't make it run rich. if it is tuned for 17, it can obviously run 12, because it would have been with part throttle. The afm will read the airflow and add the correct amount of fuel, less boost, less afm voltage, less fuel.

I agree, ECU will adjust fuel depending on load (AFM voltage) Regardless of PSI. Would be different had the boost been raised above 17..

Wow. More info. I knew with the standard ECU they self-adjusted, just wasn't too sure with a Power FC (never owned a car with aftermarket computer before so its all new to me!)

From what i have read, running the way i have it now, a lot of people get 1bar (14psi) boost. Why would i only be getting 12psi? It also doesn't feel like it pulls from 5k-8k the way it use to. Can anyone shed some light on this? Should i disconnect the battery to reset the computer?

Thanks,

George

What?

Dropping the boost won't make it run rich. if it is tuned for 17, it can obviously run 12, because it would have been with part throttle. The afm will read the airflow and add the correct amount of fuel, less boost, less afm voltage, less fuel.

I agree, ECU will adjust fuel depending on load (AFM voltage) Regardless of PSI. Would be different had the boost been raised above 17..

I concur with the concurring. Jayden no correct.

sorry, i thought that was how it worked with power fc.

Edited by Jayden.K

Yuh, PowerFC same as Nissan ECU. Measures load with AFM, so it's not tuned "for a boost level" so much as it is tuned quite naturally according to the amount of air going in. Less boost = less air = just running from a lower load part of the fuel and timing maps, exactly as if you were using part throttle.

When I say "not tuned for a boost level".....that's not entirely true, but it's close enough. Obviously if you have more boost you end up needing maybe richer mixtures and more conservative timing. But it's not really possible to separate these effects for a given turbo+ECU+AFM+engine combination....so the tune is effectively not dependent on boost as much as it is on raw measured airflow. For that given combo, less air must mean less boost, whether that airflow/boost is turned down by throttle or by boost controller doesn't make much difference.

If you increase boost above what it was tuned at, you will go off the end of the old tune and out into unexplored territory and you might blow it up (lean mixtures or too much timing the main thing here).

Yuh, PowerFC same as Nissan ECU. Measures load with AFM, so it's not tuned "for a boost level" so much as it is tuned quite naturally according to the amount of air going in. Less boost = less air = just running from a lower load part of the fuel and timing maps, exactly as if you were using part throttle.

When I say "not tuned for a boost level".....that's not entirely true, but it's close enough. Obviously if you have more boost you end up needing maybe richer mixtures and more conservative timing. But it's not really possible to separate these effects for a given turbo+ECU+AFM+engine combination....so the tune is effectively not dependent on boost as much as it is on raw measured airflow. For that given combo, less air must mean less boost, whether that airflow/boost is turned down by throttle or by boost controller doesn't make much difference.

If you increase boost above what it was tuned at, you will go off the end of the old tune and out into unexplored territory and you might blow it up (lean mixtures or too much timing the main thing here).

yep cool, i just thought powerfc were really basic computers and once it set thats it, guess i learn to never assume anything. sorry about the incorrect information

you've all been very helpful with the problems i've experienced.

But can any one shed some light on what i posted earlier?

see below.

thanks

From what i have read, running the way i have it now, a lot of people get 1bar (14psi) boost. Why would i only be getting 12psi? It also doesn't feel like it pulls from 5k-8k the way it use to. Can anyone shed some light on this? Should i disconnect the battery to reset the computer?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...