Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's caused by having too much negative camber for the type of driving you do. If you drive in a straight line most of the time (ie, not on a track) then you cannot have much neg camber or you will wear the insides of the tyres. At the rear, the problem is made worse if you like to spin them up.

And yes, this is caused by being too low. As you lower Skyline rear suspension you automatically gain neg camber. You need adjustable polyurethane upper inner bushes at a minumum, or adjustable upper arms.

This has been discussed at great length, including recently, including the legalities of the various options. So have a look around.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6847416
Share on other sites

Have this same problem, but didn't realise until recently.

I dont track or spin the rears, just normal daily street driving. My car is lowered and has -2 camber from what was on my receipt when i got my wheels aligned after the drop.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6847803
Share on other sites

yes there are shops and i cant suggest any cos im in sydney but i just want to reiterate that if you want to stay lowered then you will have to use adjustable bushes to eliminate camber OTHERWISE if you purely want to adjust coilovers to eliminate camber you may be going back to stock height.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6848616
Share on other sites

yes there are shops and i cant suggest any cos im in sydney but i just want to reiterate that if you want to stay lowered then you will have to use adjustable bushes to eliminate camber OTHERWISE if you purely want to adjust coilovers to eliminate camber you may be going back to stock height.

How much am i looking at for adjustable bushes, and do most mechanics/tyre places have them readily available?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6849069
Share on other sites

Pretty much no mechanic or tyre place will have adfjustable bushes to suit any car (except maybe Commodores!) in stock. Pretty much any tyre place cannot be trusterd to spin spanners so discount them immediately. Pretty much any mechanic could order bushes in within a day. If you fit bushes you need a set for the upper inners and a set for the inside/front ends of the radius arms as well. This will cost you a couple of hundred.

The arms need to come off and a press used to get the old bushes out and new ones in most of the time. The labour will probably end up costing more than the bushes.

Adjustable arms that have rose joints on the end (like the GKTech ones) are not street legal. Adjustable arms with bushes (such as Hardrace ones) probably are.....but you might be in for an argument with a cop and then the pain of getting it defected and having to clear the defect anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6849111
Share on other sites

Rose joints. Heim joints. Ball joints. They're metal on metal. Really good location and articulation, but......extra NVH, they wear out because they get grit in them, they are an instant defect should a cop see them, and sometimes the cheap ones are shit quality and break.

Hard Race is a brand that does adjustable arms and the like but with hard rubber bushes in them instead of the rose joints used in most adjustable arms. There are one or two other brands out there that do the same. Bushes are squidgy material between two shells to allow arms etc to have some compliance instead of hard metal-metal contact.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425081-tire-wear/#findComment-6849766
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...