Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

Im sure this has been covered before but I cant find any info can some one point me in the right direction please.

Atm I have a pretty much stock r32 gtr with a link v4 ecu and a dump pipe back exhaust. I have a gtx3071 off my other car that has a .63 exhaust housing on it and im thinking about throwing it on a cheap manifold and maxing out the injectors and seeing how it goes. If it works ok then I will go bigger injectors, fuel pump, pressure reg, e85, 6boost manifold maybe a bigger exhaust housing .82 or 1.06? etc..

The question I want to know is am I wasting my time putting this turbo? Should I just save my pennys and go for something else? Any recommendations?

Any real info would be much appreciated, cheers, lozz

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426028-rb26-with-a-gtx3071-63/
Share on other sites

My SR20 is making 290kw on 98 with a GTX3071 0.82 on 18psi ext gate. MickO was I/G wasn't it?

If you get your hands on a 0.82 housing and I think you'll have a nice 300-340kw car without pushing too hard.

Thanks guys I will throw it on and if it works but i want more power than I will up the exhaust housing and see how that goes. At the moment it is an internally gated housing but if I go bigger I will get an external gate housing

Cheers, lozz

I have a turbo off my other car. Cheap second hand manifold I can get for $150. And I have all the necessary bits and pieces to put it all together myself i cant see it costing to much. If I like the set up then I want to do it right. Eg good manifold and maybe go up a size in exhaust housing for more power

with a .82 ewg this would be pretty fun on the street.

Theres no harm in trying the existing housing if you can do all the work yourself, but I'm sure you will need to pay for a dump and other bits on top of the tune. It could prove costly.

consider getting yourself a manifold and .82 straight up. That way if it doesn't make enough power for you you can simply swap it for a larger GT30 based turbo and retune then. Bolt for bolt. Look at the recent FP 3076 HTA results for example.

that is how I would do it anyway.

I have a dump pipe I just need to modify it a bit to fit my car. But I am happy to spend the money on the manifold and exhaust housing if I can do it once and do it right.

Can anyone tell what exhaust housing I should go for then if I want to get somewhere around 300kw maybe more if I run e85. other mods I plan on doing is injectors, fpr, fuel pump and maybe cams.

with a .82 ewg this would be pretty fun on the street.

Theres no harm in trying the existing housing if you can do all the work yourself, but I'm sure you will need to pay for a dump and other bits on top of the tune. It could prove costly.

consider getting yourself a manifold and .82 straight up. That way if it doesn't make enough power for you you can simply swap it for a larger GT30 based turbo and retune then. Bolt for bolt. Look at the recent FP 3076 HTA results for example.

that is how I would do it anyway.

:action-smiley-069: Awwwwwwwww yeah!

  • Like 1

I have tried a ~ 0.63 housing and a 0.86 housing on the same turbo and same engine. Made the same peak power but moved the curve a long way with far poorer response with the bigger housing. So if you are running E85 then go the smaller housing. If you are running pump the tune wont seem to handle the back pressure as well. If its a track car that is going to see sustained high revs and load then perhaps make sure you are not giving it a gob whack of boost when at the track like you can on the street.

I am now running a T67 with a 10cm (~0.74) housing but once a few things are fixed on my car will be gong back to the 8cm housing (~0.63) Thats on a 2.5L 6cyl

There are drawbacks with smaller housings and larger ones. Just because your setup made no extra top end bumping up the housing size doesn't mean there is no benefit.

I noticed the transient response was better with the larger housing, torque should increase as should power if there are no restrictions, and obviously there will be less manifold heat and pressure. A couple of hundred rpm response lost isn't a huge price to pay. For a track car the larger housing is an obvious choice I would have thought.

E85 doesn't change the back pressure, it just masks the effects imo.

Thats my point. E85 masks the problems associated with higher than desirable back pressure. I agree that I preferred the way the 12cm housing performed on the TD06-20G on a 2.5L but 100% made for a slower car. The 8cm spooled up and hammered in a heart beat. The 12cm made for a lazier thing to drive which is a subjective like it or laothe it thing

The below graph shows all the same turbo. Its an RB20 with 8cm housing. Rb25 with 8cm housing and RB25 with 12cm housing. The 12cm housing tunes were pretty rough and ready and boost curves not stressed over. They were slapped on , minimal ignition and just initial power runs to see the characteristics of the turbos before swapping and changing setups and cams etc. But you could get a feel which way it was headed

Not all sized turbos and setups would give the same result...but for me a street GTR with occassional track work then I think based on my experience with the smaller TD06-20G and 8cm and 12cm housings I would go the smaller housing.

post-462-0-87943800-1369798945_thumb.jpg

Are those two setups exactly the same turbo? Probably irrelevant, GT30s and TD06s are quite different beasts - an RB25 (let alone an RB26) with a .82a/r GTX3071R would make an RB20 with a .63a/r GTX3071R look silly at every point in the rev range, I'd put money on it. I'd strongly suggest the .82 over the .63 in this case, personally.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...