Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

450 -500 is gtx 3582 territory on e85 on a stock ford and generally 400 plus on 98. In any case is far more than I am wanting from my daily which has to pull my boat.

Happy to step it down to the gtx 3576 for bit less.

Absolutely - basically those are cases of people oversizing their turbos versus requirements, but going by the video the XR6T motor would actually be quite streetable which means I'd still consider one myself if it were going on a 4litre - being able to build boost on 4 litre engine at 2000rpm means you are on the way to a very potent engine, and being able to make 600+rwkw on E85 means it'd never need to be upgraded.

The 3576 isn't much better then a 3582, which I originally thought it might pickup some response, the difference was very marginal, but it did pull 347rwkws on a stock manifold internally gated at 29psi.

I have a lot of disdain for the GTX3576R from everything I have seen of them (actually the whole GTX range aside from maybe GTX3582R - the HTA range was here already, and did it all... better), as you say - they don't seem to spool much better than a GT3582R and realistically they won't match the flow either, so they are just a smaller turbo. The HTA GT3582R is a much much better turbo, I reckon. Response has been likened to that of the GTX3076R but flow is equal or better than a normal GT3582R. I personally can't see any reason to go smaller than the stock XR6T turbo, but if you did - the GT3582R HTA would be the thing to go for.

The GTX76 I feel would potentially also not be enough compressor for the 4litre - its a high PR unit, the 4litre is going to want to want good flow even at 1bar boost.

Lith, the stock turbo on the FG range is a Ford spec'd 3576 with .5 cover which has been downsized from the earlier models to reduce lag. The 3582 with .5 cover is now only found on the FG F6 range.

So the GTX3576 is a higher flowing turbo than what I have. Yes the GT3582 does make slightly more power than the GTX3576 and the compressor maps suggest this should be the case. From my reading of the various ford forums the GTX3576 is appreciably more responsive than the GT3582 and those using them on their Falcons rave about them but do note that the power does fall away up top whereas the 3582 has a few more legs. However, for a street car I'll miss the responsiveness more than the power in the top part of the rev range and prefer area under the curve in that part of the rev range I mostly use.

Getting to the heady power levels you talk of, whilst easy to achieve, requires a rebuilt ZF with billet shafts, uprated tailshaft and valve springs which are additional costs I'd rather forgo.

Edited by juggernaut1

Ahh I missed that you had an FG. If this is the case, I would fully roll with an HTA3582 - there is a likelyhood you may lose a tiny bit of response over the GT3576R, however at the same time it will also be quite substantially more responsive than the GT3582R versions and an all around upgrade. I'd put money on not being able to tell the difference between a GTX3576R and an HTA3582 in lag on a 4litre (in an honest test where you don't know which one you are driving) - but the HTA being a better match for the engine. It'd work very nicely IMHO.

I'd put money on not being able to tell the difference between a GTX3576R and an HTA3582 in lag on a 4litre (in an honest test where you don't know which one you are driving) - but the HTA being a better match for the engine. It'd work very nicely IMHO.

Yes the HTA3582 is my first choice - however just awaiting a response from Forced Performance as to whether they use the superior GTX bearing cartridges.

The 3576 isn't much better then a 3582, which I originally thought it might pickup some response, the difference was very marginal, but it did pull 347rwkws on a stock manifold internally gated at 29psi.

Some comments on GTX3576 vs GT3582 .5 cover (F6 turbo) from a FordXR6Turbo thread

I have never used a gtx3582r..

I personaly think and my tuner would agree that the gtx3576r is really more like a 370-380rwkw turbo.. We had to push it to make 400rwkw and squeeze the sh*t out of it to go 430rwkw.

really this turbo was happy a 380rwkw.. I had 403rwkw with the standard F6 turbo..

Its hard to say what I liked better.. the gtx3576r is punchy and extreamly strong thro the mid rang.. But then fall over a little up top..

If you want a punchy turbo for street use and not worried if it doesnt make 400rwkw then id go the gtx3576r.(could be happy making more on E85) would pull some impresive 60fts with ease!

If you want more I can only recommend the standard F6 turbo as I havnt tried the gtx3582r.. Mine with f6 turbo at 400rwkw felt like a jet though. Pulled hard to redline.

430rwkw on the GTX3576 is E85. Think the F6 Turbo made 450rwks on E85 from memory. All other numbers pump.

Yep HTA 3582 and HTA 3586, depending on your preferences, would suit the Ford turbo crowd.

Correction...the F6 turbo was pushed to 442 on 98 with 21-22 psi....with just over 400 daily at 17 psi ...post 102

http://www.fordxr6turbo.com/forum/topic/79417-post-your-max-3540-3582r-and-gtx3583r-power-figures/page-3

Edited by juggernaut1

Ran mine at the drags on saturday, did a 10.7@135mph, wasnt my best launch, but had to stop racing as i dont have a roll cage

Very nice - with a cleaner launch that's only going to get quicker :D This is a GTR, right?

I sent them an email today .......so will see if the response has changed. Am hoping they are using the gtx cores.

I was looking at the hta 3582 or hta 3586 for my G6E turbo. Otherwise the GTX 3576 would be a punchy performer on the falcon motor.

By default they use the "normal" GT-series BB cores, however can do the metal cage by request - their billet cores they have started doing now are all metal cage though I'm not too sure how much of their range are using those, so far. Getting confirmation

Yea r32 gts4. Unfortunately at adelaide you cant run under 11sec without a cage so only get one shot at it.

I did do a 1.67 60' on my first run but got off it at half track coz i thought it wasnt a very good launch. Have done 1.58 at another track before but was only 1/8 mile.

Yea i would say about 10.3 with a good launch and bit of boost.

I looked into cage sone time ago but its not just that its alot of other stuff that is required, harness, scattersheild, external battery isolator etc. plus super sedan licence snd regular tech inspections. I decided its too expensive and too hard as its just a steeet car that i would like to race only occasionaly.

Ran mine at the drags on saturday, did a 10.7@135mph, wasnt my best launch, but had to stop racing as i dont have a roll cage

Wish i had known you were running, I would of came out to watch...

Are you going to the Skyline Nationals later this year ?

Email confirmation received that the FP turbo's are built with the GT bearings but can be built with metal cages if desired.

In other news I noticed that Alpha Omega are dealers in Forced Performance turbos - scroll approx 3/4 down the attached link.

http://www.ao-ps.com/fullrace.php

They are only going to order it on your behalf, and then tack on their tax. He is just a small outfit that runs his own website, too. So there is no real re-seller buying security.


IMHO You should organise your own purchase and establish the relationship with FP direct. That way you can get the support you need and don't need to worry if your re-seller won't be operating next week.

Yep if i were to go the metal cage route I would deal direct with FP so there is nothing lost in "translation". I just though that link up there for others who might be interested in a local dealer.

In responding to my email questions - FP also advised that, although heavily dependent on the setup, their 3586 is about 500rpm laggier than the their 3582. Further, the turbo's can also be bought without the ex housings and are $175 cheaper without the housing (in the case of the 3582 and 3586 anyway).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope, but they are definitely one of the default choices. Well established.
    • Has anyone used > https://performancecoating.com.au/  
    • Haha actually I did join back then under a different email address,  I couldn't re-activate my account so made a new one! I didn't post much anyway so not missing out on much. Amazing to see how the value of the cars and parts has changed over the years, also ACT section appears to be dead now. 
    • Thanks... It's in pretty good condition overall, probably due to not being drifted/tuned however being a daily driver has taken its toll. Had 100k on the clock when I got it, up to 180k now. Unfortunately it's not 100% dent free, it's got a small dent on FLH side and broken indicator from where I hit a small kangaroo at high speed. If you look at closely at pic #5 you might spot the dodgy trailer light repair my old man and I rigged up as temporary repair! - It's still there due to a combo of needing the car as daily driver and then too lazy/busy to fix properly. I've a couple of other minor accidents accidents as well but nothing major. One required a new front bar and unfortunately the smash repairer ordered the normal gtst one and not the aero bar. Needed the car back asap so just went with it, regretted ever since.
    • I can't believe that anyone is foolish enough to believe that the base maps are for any other purpose than to drive the car up onto the trailer/truck or gently creep it to the dyno. No matter how good they are, they can never be any better than the factory maps**, and only the foolish trust those on a significantly modified setup. **Yeah, yeah. I know there's also the difference between factory maps being fixed to certain injector sizes and MAP/AFM/VE relationships, and the likely aftermarket ECU base maps being better able to handle the sorts of changes that would render a stock ECU dangerous, like different sized injectors. But let's just ignore that for the moment, because the principle is still the same.  
×
×
  • Create New...