Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

So it will definitely need the intake pipe, spacer plate and probably 2.5 inch intercooler piping and almost certainly another custom dump? And oil and water lines maybe? Is $1200 a decent price for all those? That doesn't include installation obviously

Pretty steep.

I'd want to be paying 200 for lines, 200 for an intake and not more than 500 for the dump and spacer plate. I would also expect these prices to accommodate install whilst on the job.

Those are very 'rounded' numbers, too.

An intake pipe on a skyline with a pod is very simple to make, and unless you want breathers and stuff added then you don't even need to have one made. A simple 90 degree bend with a pod on the end of it can be had. You can also source your line kit from Kando dynamic on eBay for less than I quoted.

Where are you located?

I'm trying to avoid pods as much as possible. I'm trying to keep the standard air box. I'm going for a stealthy as possible look. I've even hacked up the heat shield over the exhaust to make room for the custom 3' dump so if possible I'd like to keep air box heat shield etc. obviously of this is impossible I can do without.

I'm in Sydney; specifically bankstown. Know any good places that can do things like intake pipes etc. ATM I go to pulse racing at Menai for anything I can't do myself and they have been pretty good so far

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

Not sure if people think it's OT but that T04S compressor housing is a bulky cow of a think and I still have to wonder if it makes that much difference over a T04E one . If you look through the range of FP HTA GT30/35 based turbos most / all have that T04S housing and it makes them look BIG . Correct me if I'm wrong but from 71 to 86mm HTA compressors must have significantly different air flow rates yet all use a modified S housing . Garrett doesn't seem to have problems using the more compact E housing with it's 2" outlet and they seem to get good power out of it . Perhaps the Ford XR6 GT3582R version is good to look at considering it has an even smaller A/R (0.50 vs 0.60) version of the T04E compressor housing and it copes sort of OK for a 4 litre engine .

Lith you may think I'm splitting hairs but I've read quite a few threads where people build up their Skylines and end up going to an aftermarket exhaust manifold and hang something off it with a biggish comp housing ie 3582R or similar outline thing . The applicable plumbing in/out is huge and quite obvious compared to OE RB25DET , they get pulled over for a lid lift and it's game over - take it back to standard inc emissions test . The average Joe is never going to take it back to standard and another Skyline bites the dust .

Lith we both know a 3076R doesn't look standard either but I reckon it looks a bit less lethal and is a bit easier to fit - purely because of it's compressor housing .

People like me want to keep the standard exhaust manifold and air box and we run the return flow intercoolers with 2 inch pipes to keep things looking mostly standard .

Obviously FP aren't stupid and they use these HTA wheels in Mitsy or similar housings on Evo turbos - direct fit ones in Evo 9s .

The last thing I want is a bulky turbo because it's so obvious , I am interested in 71 and 76 HTAs but not with that compressor housing . It's the only thing that lets them down IMO .

A .

When you make out like the T04S monsters the T04E compressor housing, I can't help but think of this turbo line up - features a Garrett GT40R, GT37R, GT35R, GT30R and a Borg Warner S200SX and S300SX to put everything into perspective:

allturbos.jpg

lol the T04S is only a tiny bit larger than the T04E, the outlet size is the biggest change.

Exactly..disco is tripping ballsacks, ive measured them up, theres fark all in it, T04S housings looked big in the 90's..lol

An hour (if that) and some ACL heatshield..and you'll never see see a 3540 comp cover on a standard manifold at all, no matter how hard you look....im pretty sure i posted a photo, just for you in another thread.

its not hard....and you can fit your return flow no worries aswell

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Silly me - updated the wrong thread, I was meant to post this here :wacko:

A Supra owner in the US has upgraded from their old Borg Warner S467 T4 turbo to a T3 flanged FP Super99HTZ and picked up 15% more power with a huge increase in spool - they run a Powerglide and usually use a transbrake however they are testing for an event this weekend where the class they will be in doesn't allow transbrakes, so they did testing using a foot brake starting at low boost to see how much they could hold back with the foot brake and have already laid down a 8.97 @ 151mph... I suspect when they get to a meet they can use the transbrake and wind up the boost a few eyebrows will be raised - not that running 8s on a T3 based turbo with a Supra isn't pretty unreal as it is!
Here's a dyno vid (unfortunately they only uploaded to FB): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=194348620749465&set=vb.173984302785897&type=2&theater
Dyno numbers will be a bit messed up due to the loose Powerglide - but a Supra running 8s at >150mph is going to be making north of 900hp to start with, it isn't running NOS and it did it off the foot brake with more boost in it.... so safe to say that it's already a pretty stout result :)

It's pretty much the same as low mounting a GT3582R - everything is pretty much the same as a GT3076R but the compressor housing is larger .70a/r T04S housing instead of .60a/r T04E one - slightly larger outlet

Dat HTA3076 :wub:

f4094b3d-d8d3-4612-8c5d-4526a04234f9_zps

  • Like 1

Still a bit dark about travelling >2000km to Australia to meet some of your clowns and after spending weeks helping deciding on a turbo I never got to hear cam noise or see this thing in the flesh :P

  • 3 weeks later...

Here's a clip of that Supra with the Super99 HTZ doing an 8.95 @ 152mph off the foot brake with a Powerglide (no trans brake use allowed in the street class it was racing in).

It has since done an 8.75 using the transbrake at an event the following weekend - trap speeds aren't much higher, but it is out of gear in the top end so needs a higher final drive to knock the trap speeds up now. Probably worth mentioning the car races on radials too, apparently.

I remember being told a Supra would never go sub 9s with a T3 turbo - I guess they may have been right, this Supra pretty much skipped the 9s and went straight into the 8s ;)

  • 3 weeks later...

In regards to anyone running the FP HTA 3076 on the standard manifold, what kind of wastegate setup would prove to be the hot option? Wastegate pipe welded onto standard manifold or welding a wastegate setup directly onto the turbine housing. Very curious.

Thanks in advance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...