Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So where are these genuine T4 divided rears for GT35's? I can only find genuine divided T3 or crappy T4 divided ATP housings?

I was saying last night at our SAU meeting that someone was chasing a T4 rear... It was you :P I think Lithium had a heads up on where to find them?

Dumb - I went to get a link and realised it was only T3 divided, not that it should be a show stopper - but T4 would be more ideal due if nothing else to the commonality of T4 Divided "things".

I called GCG and apparently they only have non-genuine T4 Divided housings to suit GT35's.

Wouldn't recommend using them if you intend on pushing it at all

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

My mates Evo has run a few twinscroll HTA Turbos.

HTA3582R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 450kW

HTA3586R with 1.06 A/R Rear Housing - Made 500kW

Difference is about 2-300RPM in spool.

The HTA3586R is the BEST all round forced performance turbo you can buy unless your running really big boost like 40+psi. But under 40psi, the HTA3586R will be more responsive and make similar power as the HTA3794R's.

I ALMOST went to a HTA3586R. But just didn't due to $$ that I was spending elsewhere on the car..

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

On a pissy 2 litre youd be right , on a Rb30 , the 3794 should walk away easy on less than 30psi i would have thought

I'd love to try a FP4294 or 3794 on a sohc, just the normal garret 4294 was a very good thing with a auto and

small 8.5 inch torque converter

Yeah I reckon! The new Super94 (which basically outperforms the 3794/PT6766/pretty much any 67mm turbo in spool and flow apparently) is actually for sale for a REALLY reasonable price considering what it is capable of, here's hoping there are other turbine housings available on request for the bigger motor guys as the .85 seems a little small - though the Boostin Performance DSM trapped at 177mph so it would have to be putting out near >1000hp with the thing, so maybe the flow is suited and conventional wisdom could be overlooked in this instance:

ttp://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER94&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

I'd expect it would be totally streetable on a 3litre - imagine of street/drag weapon something like that could be? :wub:

here the link for the T4 TS housings for the GT35R 1.06A/R. I think the A/R is a bit big for me because im just chasing 400kw with something with reasonable response.

http://www.treadstoneperformance.com/product.phtml?p=1905&cat_key=595&prodname=Garrett+Turbine+Housing+T4+Divided+inlet+1.06+A%2FR+GT3582R

They are not very expensive aswell

Looks like an ATP housing, we were playing with a BW S300SX 8375 and a GT3582R (with ATP 1.06a/r T4 TS) housings a while ago comparing the general turbo stuff and there was a definite difference in quality etc - GT3582R on the right:

post-11136-0-84273000-1370490809_thumb.jpg

post-11136-0-27948200-1370490817_thumb.jpg

^ I think its got to do with the casting process and quality of steel used.

Yep - that is my understanding too. Here's one a 1.06a/r one from a E85 guzzling S15 race car from here which demonstrates what concerns me:

2011-11-17075840.jpg

2011-11-17075854.jpg

Anyone managed to find the T4 twin scrolls for the HTA3582 i would probably just bite the bullet and get one.??

http://www.streettunedmotorsports.com/parts/fp_hta_gt3582r_ball_bearing_turbo.htm

these guys offer t4 divided?

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

Thats the ful unit though im trying to source out a housing and maybe would make it cheaper because $2269. Is a lot and its not proven on RB25 though it has some serious potential packed

You know its going to make insane power and lag will be very little in comparison to equal sized turbos, the results would be the same sort as mine just on a higher scale!

the price is what is holding me back but if i get a fat tax back this is what im getting. if its not as i like resale shouldnt be hard with a few hundred off the price

Depends on where you want to compromise and what you think you will get the most reward from, you can definitely save a reasonable amount of money and still get respectable performance - however with this there is less risk you are going to look back and think... Maybe this could be better, but now I have spent the money.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...