Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey 9krpm, I see your building a weapon, Freddie from top stage was talking about your beast. Will your car be ready?

It will be ready. Most things are done. Just that I am not sure what I am allowed to post/share on here so I have been a bit "shy" with my thread and I have been so hectic with work. Looking forward to some testing soon.

Did you use any boot reinforcement with the Aeromotion wing?

Good luck with the project.

It will be ready. Most things are done. Just that I am not sure what I am allowed to post/share on here so I have been a bit "shy" with my thread and I have been so hectic with work. Looking forward to some testing soon.

Did you use any boot reinforcement with the Aeromotion wing?

Good luck with the project.

Shy? It's a build thread dude start posting.

Definitely reinforced the boot, boys made a frame under the boot, that the wing attaches too, so boot and wing are one, then braced to boot chassis so the wing and boot come off in one piece.

0.9 aircraft stainless steal, can purchase from few different places, it's extremely light and works perfect for our build

Oh I see that is excellent. Would you mind lettin me know where you sourced it from? You can PM me if you like. Thanks

Oh I see that is excellent. Would you mind lettin me know where you sourced it from? You can PM me if you like. Thanks

Aircraft Exhausts Australia Pty Ltd

Stainless Steel Products & Equipment - Boronia, VIC

2 Glenann Crt, Boronia VIC 3155

PHONE

(03) 9762 6290

what's the height of your rear wing? Just the standard setup from aeromotions?

website says height is 12" for a 32/33 vs the r35's 8". Other specs are all the same.

and nice work on the car. impressive.

12 inch uprights, you can order up to 16inch which they have and would get your wing above roofline, ours could go another inch or so higher to be level with the roofline, can go higher again for more downforce but the rules won't permit us. We are gonna do some more testing to see how balanced the car is before we try and add more rear downforce. The wing works fantastic at Phillip island in the past in the old set up, sydney motorsport park will be a different story as the corner speeds are not as fast as the island.

Gonna reinstall the full race torque split controller when it gets wired. It's an awesome product that works, and so easy to use If anyone that reads this post that has used the ruzic and full race controller I would love to hear your feedback and experiences with them.

post-19978-0-91524200-1370402650_thumb.jpg

Paul Cahill in vic has good things to say about the ets pro. reckons he dropped 3secs a lap at phillip island the moment he installed it.
Mark Berry tried it in his 32 and hated it. put in the ruzic II and said it was 98% as good as the module that paul ruzic put into his 34 time attack car which was far more hands on in terms of tuning.

I don't think either are a bad option. I've gone a Full Race ETS-Pro but was pretty much a coin toss between that and a Ruzic.

Was really impressed with your results... I have gone down this path as well. What are you now pushing on ur 6262?

I thought I saw precision somewhere in this thread... what one are u running Steve?

Does the car behave more like a 4wd if turned all the way up from those with experience?

Paul Cahill is a mate that actually put me on to using the full race controller, I just don't understand how the ruzic controller uses GPS feedback, doesnt gps have delayed response time also? how does the same map benefit different set up cars. Confused as I'm not that educated on the device so hence me asking if people have used and how they find it.

I'll post some photos of Paul's new aero set up, it's crazy, paul and I are actually fighting it out for fastest lap times at the island.

you don't need to use the gps module. i've bought the non-gps unit.
the maps can be altered/tuned.
my car will be up and running soon so will be able to give more feedback. have also combined it with a quaife front diff.

i was also sold by the fact that paul ruzic is local and is happy to jump on the phone to you to help tune/improve your individual setup.
i figured if mark berry was impressed then i'll be more than satisfied with its performance.

you don't need to use the gps module. i've bought the non-gps unit.

the maps can be altered/tuned.

my car will be up and running soon so will be able to give more feedback. have also combined it with a quaife front diff.

i was also sold by the fact that paul ruzic is local and is happy to jump on the phone to you to help tune/improve your individual setup.

i figured if mark berry was impressed then i'll be more than satisfied with its performance.

Looking forward to hearing back on your results when ready, pm when all good and running, cheers.

Was really impressed with your results... I have gone down this path as well. What are you now pushing on ur 6262?

I thought I saw precision somewhere in this thread... what one are u running Steve?

Does the car behave more like a 4wd if turned all the way up from those with experience?

Haven't tuned it up yet but the power will be 450-500rwkw, using the 6466 precision turbo. When dean drove the car last we had also increased tyre size from 265 to 305 width with the full race controller, so can't say exactly how much contribution the controller on its own was but the feedback was that he didn't get any wheel spin out of corners...it would just grip up and shoot out of the turns. Especially out of Honda corner which always spun, were running about 420-440 kw at the time, dean turned the controller all the way up. Now this combination actually caused us an issue which we never had before....oil surge, hence the dry sump set up. It's got so much mechanical grip.

This is Paul's new set up....crazy. He should smash my time, that is till we go back out again lol.

And this is joes car we are both trying to beat, 1.36 to beat.

We have all been fighting it out for a while, all in good fun.

post-19978-0-00008300-1370414320_thumb.jpg

post-19978-0-21602100-1370414580_thumb.jpg

Paul Cahill in vic has good things to say about the ets pro. reckons he dropped 3secs a lap at phillip island the moment he installed it.

Mark Berry tried it in his 32 and hated it. put in the ruzic II and said it was 98% as good as the module that paul ruzic put into his 34 time attack car which was far more hands on in terms of tuning.

Must admit I havnt tried the Ruzic. But was and am very happy with the ETS PRO. Would like to hear feed back re the Ruzic as well.

Cheers

Paul

Paul Cahill is a mate that actually put me on to using the full race controller, I just don't understand how the ruzic controller uses GPS feedback, doesnt gps have delayed response time also? how does the same map benefit different set up cars. Confused as I'm not that educated on the device so hence me asking if people have used and how they find it.

I'll post some photos of Paul's new aero set up, it's crazy, paul and I are actually fighting it out for fastest lap times at the island.

BRING IT ON ON !! LOL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
    • A 180SX has a much better look than a FD. The roofline is far superior being a fastback. It's popups look better. In a world where we all subconsciously add a little bit of low, and wheels of our preference, it's just more handsome than the FD is. The FD just looks 'bubbly' in comparison. It can come down to preference, sure. But "The FD is the BEST looking (on appearances alone) 90's JDM car without question?" Nah. Plenty of questions lol. I could think of 8 cars I think look fundamentally better, and probably a handful of ones that look about on par with a FD. (like say a SW20 MR2) I feel people like/overrate the FD because of it's mythicality/rarity, its rotary and it's unpredictable nature. It probably drives great, you can stuff a ton of tyre under there, has a unique sound, light as hell. I feel that people reading this thinking "YOU CANT RATE A 180 ABOVE A FD BECAUSE A 180 IS A CHEAP DRIFT BUCKET" prove the point about bias as to what the car represents, moreso than how it actually looks.. I feel the 80's boxy/squared off look is becoming better looking due to time, and 90's melted soap bar aesthetics have not aged well. (yet?) And this thread is purely about looks :p
    • A red or yellow S15 wins my vote, Ack that it just scraps in with the 90's cars theme, but they are great looking little sports car Next would be a A80 Supra (pre face lift), whilst the A80 has its own issues, I feel is the best looking larger GT car As for the FD, "I" feel that the reason it triggers me in a non-positve way when looking at one, is like looking at a high maintenance pretty girl who you know is mentally unstable and likely to explode for no apparent reason
    • Yes, it's because it has hips and bulges on the top/front surface, a tiny cockpit and roof, and the skin looks like it is stretched over muscle. The proportions are....perfect. Long nose, short rear, short roof. What's not to like? It continues the theme started with the S1, that peaked with the FC, being "looking like a front engined Porsche", while gaining a little more of the 60's Mustang coupe profile and stretching the skin more tightly over the understructure. The FD is definitely colour sensitive though. Like all Mazdas. There are plenty of details on it that changed over the years that were either better or worse, could have been done better the first time and/or never changed for the worse. But...the same can be said for the NSX. In fact, that's probably even more true for the NSX. I've also just worked out that part of the reason I don't like the rear of the NSX is that the integrated wing is too similar to that shitful R33 rear wing.  
    • I wonder if people like the FD because it reminds them of old 60's roadsters and such. It just gives me such a 'roadster/soft cruising' vibe as opposed to anything more hard-edged and purposeful. That, mixed with 90's melted soap bar styling. It's hardly ugly, but it's kinda oddly proportioned to me, relative to about 10 other cars I had a think about based on this thread. 
×
×
  • Create New...