Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd like to see this fully sorted in a 4WD Magna. It'd probably be near perfect for those roads out Alice way. I get out there once a month and the rental Magna I get bangs on the speed limiter @ 215klm/h whenever I get the chance. A torque monster turbo version would be cool! De-restricted it'd boogy!

I dunno' Dunc, 4WD might be handy for a bit of off-road work - Ya know, so hes can do pig shootin' n'at :D 500hp GT-R + spotties + lift kit ='s huntin' time! Yeeeehar :D

That's what 4WD is for isn't it? Off-roadin' :cheers:

I have vid footage of a mate in his immaculate 550hp (Tomei cams, N1 this, Apexi that) '97 GT-R V Spec, it's covered in dust after fanging around on shitty dirt roads in Victoria somewhere. When I say covered in dust, I mean like a 4WD after it's done a LOT of off-roading! He took the vid just to shock me! I don't like to see dirty Skylines :D

  • 2 months later...

well, if you still remember me;

this is the latest.

266kw and 500nm from 3000rpm up :bonk:

turbo; GT40R

custom hand made and developed manifolds;

OLD FIGURE; (black line)

249.9kw/425nm torque

NEW FIGURE (red line)

266.2KW / ~500NM torque..

the old girl is spooled by 3000rpm from there on in - you just hang on for dear life!! lol

attachment.php?attachmentid=3407

more info here;

http://www.aussiemagna.com/forums/showthre...ead.php?t=10327

pic of the car for those intrested;

attachment.php?attachmentid=3402

attachment.php?attachmentid=3410

more pics can be found here; http://www.booyamotorsport.com/v2/sep_pic/index.htm

why such little power from a car with such "tuff" internals and such a large turbo?

whats missing from the package?

not this particular engine. this engine has stock internals.. no shit. its stock inside bar the headwork.

the other engine is getting bored as we speaka.

:headspin:

believe it or not. its a completely stock engine thats done 115,000km.. haha.. damn, and who said mitsubishi dont make tough engines.....

when is the next time you SA guys are having a dyno day :)

BOoya

I never realised just how many wankers there really are on sau. Seriously some of you guys are pathetic. I dont like magnas either but I give this guy credit for choosing to go down a modification path that most others wouldnt.

Each to his own - some of you guys need to pull you head in

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...