Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think his question is, with the information hes been told, should he run a restrictor if the CHRA already has a restrictor built in which if there are two restrictors in place could choke the turbo of oil and if there is no restrictor in the CHRA then he could flood it with oil. I don't think rebuilding a turbo requires a change of the CHRA, usually bearings, wheels and shaft. If that is the case, continue using it as you were before.

I think his question is, with the information hes been told, should he run a restrictor if the CHRA already has a restrictor built in which if there are two restrictors in place could choke the turbo of oil and if there is no restrictor in the CHRA then he could flood it with oil. I don't think rebuilding a turbo requires a change of the CHRA, usually bearings, wheels and shaft. If that is the case, continue using it as you were before.

We kind of knew that, but were trying to encourage the expression of ideas and questions in actual, readable English text.

And a HKS GT turbo has a BB core and therefore is not "rebuildable" and does in fact require a new CHRA.

You shouldn't tell people that!!!!

Actually, I apologise for accusing you of not being able to communicate in English properly. If you stand back and look at your original post, it looks like it was written by someone from the new Gen Z crowd who suffer from a near complete inability to communicate properly.

BUT.....if you look at it knowing that your first language is French, then it also makes sense why it doesn't read quite right. Again, my aplogies!

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe but doubt it, when I jacked it up it was creaking in the j arm again. The inners are all good, I inspected them. Remember that also it did fix the problem but temporarily.
    • Could be the other bushes. The inners.
    • Once you lose the adjustable bushes, you have almost no adjustment at the front for anything that matters. You can only wind so master caster at the front, and ~7° is fine. You won't have choice of front camber. If you only have rear camber arms (ie, do not also have adjustable upper tension arms), you shouldn't change their length very much, because you will introduce bump steer. And, you will struggle to find a workshop that will be capable of doing all the adjustment work necessary to simultaneously achieve a decent rear camber number, get the toe right, and minimise bump steer. I would guess there's probably 8 hours of work there. So, stockish rear camber is fine. Although, keep in mind, that stock camber, by number value, does not mean stock arm length when the car is lowered. You will need to lengthen the RUCA to get back to stockish values and that will require the tension arm to be lengthened a little also. Without any other guidance, any change made to the RUCA should have the 2/3 of the same change made on the tension arm. But that is only a rough rule of thumb and the relationship might not remain linear across a wide range of adjustments. And it might not also be as close to minimum bump steer as you could achieve if you did the bump steer measurement and adjustment properly.
×
×
  • Create New...