Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heard my name mentioned.

Just get your gases out as fast as you can AFTER they have been used by the turbo charger....YOU DO NOT WANT BACK PRESSURE HERE PERIOD.

Exhaust manifold design is what governs turbine behavior and that is all you want to affect the turbo...After the turbo, gasses do nothing, they are waste and if you don't get rid of them fast enough they will effect the turbo's performance in a NEGATIVE way....NEVER IN A POSITIVE WAY...NEVER.

MY RECOMMENDATION IS:

Speak to an RB workshop that do this for a living and have done all the R&D on multiple setups to know exactly what you need.

More factors then just the manifold govern the turbine 'behaviour' such as turbo design, PSI, engine design, displacement, cams, Volumetric efficiency and off course witchcraft.

But your theory is no backpressure is the best, so have u tested this on a dyno by running back to back with an exhaust and then without dump pipes to run straight of the turbo like u said?

I'd be interested in the results..

More factors then just the manifold govern the turbine 'behaviour' such as turbo design, PSI, engine design, displacement, cams, Volumetric efficiency and off course witchcraft.

 

But your theory is no backpressure is the best, so have u tested this on a dyno by running back to back with an exhaust and then without dump pipes to run straight of the turbo like u said?

 

I'd be interested in the results..

If you really want to learn about RB turbo R&D I would ask these guys before you post anymore garbage.

Or these guys

They have have so much knowledge that it would make you head explode. And it's all based on 20 years of real life R&D.

When they talk you listen because 5mins with them teach you more than the years crap that you think you already know.

Edited by XGTRX

After speaking to JEM they've told me they i could go a bigger exhaust but the minimal gains are quite pointless on my setup...

For the 1kplus id be spending for not that much of a gain...

I'll be keeping the current exhaust and ill upload a dyno when i'm finished it all.

After speaking to JEM they've told me they i could go a bigger exhaust but the minimal gains are quite pointless on my setup...

For the 1kplus id be spending for not that much of a gain...

I'll be keeping the current exhaust and ill upload a dyno when i'm finished it all.

Good stuff mate. That's the best way to do it. Everything else healthy?

Good stuff mate. That's the best way to do it. Everything else healthy?

Yeah man the car is really healthy and im fussy with all my maintenance.

So hopefully she stays healthy haha.

Hoping i can run the 10.99. Ran 11.8 on std turbo n std ecu.

i think its doable but wont be easy.

Awesome mate make sure you post up your time and mph. When are you heading out?

Won't be draging till at least December because november 30th powerplay is on and i've got a garage once again.... Knowing my luck ill break shit before powerplay if i drag hahah.

It will happen though... For now you can check my video of my stock run haha.

Edited by sultanaz

I saw that video about 2 weeks ago on youtube, wow such a small world lol that's a fast time 4 stock turbos, how much boost?

16psi stock ecu

that ugly jaggerd dyno run climb.... Tappers off though

Edited by sultanaz
  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

Ben, I hope you don't mind me asking on your thread but I want to get advice on my potential exhaust setup:

I have a basically stock RB26 (R33) in my BNR32 with a R32 std mani, turbos, dumps, front pipe, cat, and 2.5" mine's cat-back.

After reading this thread (all bullsheit aside), I'm thinking about upgrading to BNR34 std mani, BNR34 std dumps, 3" Titanium front (short design vs long pipes), ARC Ti 3" de-cat, and Mine's Ti 3" cat back.

My BNR32 is a club racer so Response > WHP. Can I get this ya'll opinion on my setup before I enter my credit numerals into websites?

If you have read the thread carefully you will know that you won't lose any response but on a stock motor you will not see any massive increase in power. But it will stand you in good stead when you do go for more power.

Ben, I hope you don't mind me asking on your thread but I want to get advice on my potential exhaust setup:

I have a basically stock RB26 (R33) in my BNR32 with a R32 std mani, turbos, dumps, front pipe, cat, and 2.5" mine's cat-back.

After reading this thread (all bullsheit aside), I'm thinking about upgrading to BNR34 std mani, BNR34 std dumps, 3" Titanium front (short design vs long pipes), ARC Ti 3" de-cat, and Mine's Ti 3" cat back.

My BNR32 is a club racer so Response > WHP. Can I get this ya'll opinion on my setup before I enter my credit numerals into websites?

Make it atleast 3.5 inch from the merge of the front pipes back. 3 inch is wrx toy junk!

Make it atleast 3.5 inch from the merge of the front pipes back. 3 inch is wrx toy junk!

Lol. In my situation, I'm going for weight saving via exhaust, lighter wheels, rotors, etc. I'm not sure if there's a Ti exhaust that's affordable and 3.5".

My theory about the BNR34 manifold is: If the BNR32 dumps are crap and the BNR34 are better then won't the BNR34 manifold be better than the BNR32 manifold...? is it a waste of money to but a BNR34 manifold?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...