Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So heres the Idea to get me to the 500rwhp mark

I've currently got an R34 GTt with its internally standard RB25 Neo.

It has head work, cams, gears, greddy plenum, e85 1000cc IDs, Link G4 PnP, e-boost2, SS coilpacks, FMIC, oil cooler & walbro 255.
Twin Plate Exedy already done too.
It still has the standard turbo & as such i'm not seeing power past the 190rwkw mark. (I'm okay with this for now).

My next major mod is to consider the turbo setup.

I'm thinking GTX3582r.

But here's the catch. I'm wondering if anyone has thought of using the stock manifold, (port matched & polished to get the most out of it) & gone straight out of the turbo, across the head & into the throttle body using a water/meth injection kit as the cooling aid instead of an intercooler.

My reasoning being, is that I've successfully installed the water meth kit on my Nissan Patrol (DIESEL) & the difference it made to operation, intake & EG temperatures was unreal!
The intake temperature alone dropped 40 degrees C

Also there is the benefits that the methanol brings to the table as well, slower, cooler & more complete burn allowing more timing & less chance of detonation.
Also using a turbo as big as a GTX3582r with only a foot or so of intercooler piping would be like running a 3076 with a FMIC in terms of how it would spool up. So it would give me the benefits of running a larger frame turbo (high volume, low pressure, lower outlet temps) whilst utilising the response otherwise seen in the smaller frame. It also would yield a bigger power band as it would come onto boost much sooner & yet not run out of puff up top like the smaller frame turbo.

Also using the stock manifold would aid in low end torque response.

The removal of all that intercooler piping is also a weight redistibution that would be moved from the front & installed in the rear of the car in the form of a water tank, pump & assorted control gear.

SO!!!! Who wants to help me with the "Why" & "Why Not"s of this setup.

Also let me remove the most controversial Why Not. Water Meth injection is legal as long as the two parts don't exceed 50/50 concentrations as after this point the mixture has to high a volatility & meth being what it is then becomes a problem.

For the noobs out there, Water injection doesn't create a hydro-lock as the water volume to fuel ratio is very low, atomised & turns to steam before it has the ability to do damage.

This is a Genuine Idea people so lets not shot it out of the water yet

Thanks

Nick

Plans down the track for a Tomei 2.8l stroker kit too

Edited by wizaa_101

unfortunately loosing the fmic wont make any real difference to the rpm boost threashold, just to lag, i wouldnt expect a gtx35r to come close to a gt3076r, when they are worse than a gt35r. Imo spend the money on a hta 3076 with a good setup manifold/gate etc, probably the most responsive 500rwhp you will get, need e85 or wmi though

unfortunately loosing the fmic wont make any real difference to the rpm boost threashold, just to lag, i wouldnt expect a gtx35r to come close to a gt3076r, when they are worse than a gt35r. Imo spend the money on a hta 3076 with a good setup manifold/gate etc, probably the most responsive 500rwhp you will get, need e85 or wmi though

+1

Yuh, I concur with the peeps above who say that you should use an intercooler. Intercooling is free temperature loss. You want that temperature loss, PLUS what you can get from WMI. WMI on its own won't get you as cold as having both together.

Next problem is whether you can attach a 3582 onto the stock exhaust manifold. Tight squeeze? Wrong flange? Something something.

ok

why not- massive ignition setup to light the mixture will cost a arm and leg

why not-the massive amount of mixture you have to inject is borderline ridicilous on 98 octane, the math has been done before

E85 or meth, go for it...but not worth it..and you still be injecting f**kloads

whynot- the cooler pipe shorter will make f**kall difference..

cheers

darren

I'd just go with E70/85 and if you really want to play evaporative cooling move the injectors further from the head flange . I really don't think intercoolers are a biggie especially when you can get ones like the Blitz return flow that can't be seen in the bay - at all .

it will hit full boost earlier, at the very least 500rpms sooner if not 750-1000rpms.

no clue of how badly it will heat soak.......

:no:

Kids these days....

I'm here to tell you, you will not gain 1000rpm of response from running a direct pipe. Especially not with a 3582r on an rb25.

To OP... nice idea, been thought of and tested before. A well set up evap/chemical cooling solution can work better than an air to air exchanger. A well set up system is not an off the shelf wmi, not even close. It would be very expensive as compared to a traditional intercooler. Other than the potential for slightly better cooling, there is no real gain. No real gain in response, serious strain on ignition system and not as reliable.

If you are hell bent on a shorter intake track, just run a barrel style water to air cooler set up.

J.

Thread is pointless.

Now that E85 has been available for some time now im not sure why people still bother with meth injection.

500HP out of an internally stock NEO is achievable with a factory turbo manifold, externally waste gated turbo of your choice, factory inlet manifold and a supporting fuel system.

  • Like 1

Thread is pointless.

Now that E85 has been available for some time now im not sure why people still bother with meth injection.

500HP out of an internally stock NEO is achievable with a factory turbo manifold, externally waste gated turbo of your choice, factory inlet manifold and a supporting fuel system.

because E85 is not viable for a everday car..nor is it viable for a car you TRULY use, go on holidays in, drive interstate, drive to work and drive around on weekends....its for the weekenders and race cars. and its still a pain in the ass to go get it unless you have drums at your house.

thats why some people would bother...

cheers

darren

Other than the drive interstate part, I have had no issues on ethanol in my daily, for over 4 years now. I just wish they would stick a few pumps up the main interstate routes to save me taking the missus car on long trips. (Melbourne does have the majority of the pumps though.)

Mixing up water meth every few days would be a pain in the arse imo, plus having to store fairly large quantities of flammables around the house. I contemplated switching back to petrol with WMI but the benefits of e85 don't just stop at it's detonation protection... Do they...

because E85 is not viable for a everday car..nor is it viable for a car you TRULY use, go on holidays in, drive interstate, drive to work and drive around on weekends....its for the weekenders and race cars. and its still a pain in the ass to go get it unless you have drums at your house.

thats why some people would bother...

cheers

darren

Ethanol content sensor. That is all.

Whoa! Good start!

First off, this isn't a useless thread. It's a learning curve for next person who thinks to do this & they'll be able to deduce from this weather or not it's right for them.

I guess jet_r31 has summarised the why nots the best
However we're not talking family turbo car. We're talking a car that sees the road, more infrequently than the daily & that sees the track more frequently than the road.

The Link ECU will be getting a Flex fuel sensor installed

The goal is to reduce lag & maintain the top end

Jet_r31: I didn't take into consideration the ignition system & you're right the SS coilpacks wouldn't hold up. Maybe something like the LS coilpacks would. I've also heard some good things about some late model corolla coilpacks but unconfirmed.

Also the other big why not that I didn't do util today is the amount of water/meth I'd be mixing. Turns out that a 20L drum isn't going to out last a tank of fuel & I'm not sure its worth it carrying more than 20L of extra liquid.

I have no intentions of staying with the standard exhaust manifold either.

I think its back to the drawing board then

3076 does look like the way to go.

What other turbos are available from other companies that are of a similar frame to the 3076?

you just don't get it.., let me know when you "flex fuel sensor" your family turbo car, and how it goes for you...

cheers

darren

My tuner has done just that to his daily.

Its perfect with no issue. So as far as im concerned I do get it.

To the OP.

If you want to reduce lag there are other ways to do it.

- A turbo suitable to your aplication and power goals

- Anti lag if your keen

- A well set up ignition system using a crank trigger setup so you can have dead accurate ignition timing all the time enabling you to be more aggressive in areas of the map without having to worry about ignition scatter from the OEM CAS. E85 really helps here too as its less prone to knock.

- Dont delete your FMIC, but instead take the piping along the shortest route.

Theres other ways as well.

Jet_r31. So you'd rather mix up a water/meth mix for your family turbo car every time you drive it rather than simply have an ethanol content sensor allowing you to just drive it and forget...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
    • There are guys on Facebook under, Infiniti Owners Australia   https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1Z3RbPqx4k/?mibextid=wwXIfr What Whp are you after and I can help, and join this Q group in the states. https://www.facebook.com/share/g/19A59cN3JR/?mibextid=wwXIfr
×
×
  • Create New...