Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah its been around for some time :yes:

I like his honesty though -

"DO NOT WASTE MY TIME if you have no money dont bother me i am old and grumpy."

:laugh:

Would still set you back $100K plus to replicate it too.

Bargain IMHO.

Pete has been trying to sell her for a while now unfortunately without much luck. Pity as its a beautiful car and would be a shame to have it fall into the hands of a test pilot with money to burn which could potentially see it on the 6 o'clock news ploughed into a wall.

The owner is obviously a pretty wealthy guy. Its been for sale for agesss, years I reckon. I have seen it time and time again for sale. I blame not just the steep price but the old-era styling. If I were him, ide update its cosmetic condition to suit current times and trends that sell. He could probably sell the bodykit and wing for a bit to someone whos after a genuine good condition item. Stock bodykit + better fitment + respray if he wants to fork out for it. Yeah, obviously going to cost alot to do that but I think it would sell the car. At the minimum stock wing + some better wheel fitment would help it sell. That shade of purple isnt everyones pick of colour.

The biggest issue for a lot of people in the know is that it's not a Gtr, it's a gts4 with all the gaurds fitted. Which means no "bcnr" chassis number and for a lot of people that makes a lot a difference

Maybe not to an uneducated buyer. He's not exactly selling a worked commodore here :)

If you want a monster and wish to save about $20k, this would be the way to do it.

no he's selling a Toyota Lexcen badged as a commodore...
  • Like 1

only if he's trying to sell a GTR as a GTS4...

So by the same token Autech did exactly the same thing with the 260RS. Not too many complaints about that car. Only thing of note was the popular R34 GTR nose conversion.

Unless you've actually seen the vehicle in person, please don't make armchair judgements about what he is and isn't selling.

It is a nice car in it's own right. The beauty is in the eye of the seller and buyer.

no doubt a fortune spent. Appreciate it for what it is.

Personally I don't like the shape of the 33 skyline. Be it GTS, T, 4 or an R.

But that's me.

different strokes for different folks

Edit: Although I don't like seeing cars badged what they aren't

Edited by Sinista32

So by the same token Autech did exactly the same thing with the 260RS. Not too many complaints about that car. Only thing of note was the popular R34 GTR nose conversion.

Unless you've actually seen the vehicle in person, please don't make armchair judgements about what he is and isn't selling.

I think the difference here is that the Autech 260RS is a factory-certified model, and it had extra chassis bracing as well as the R33 GT-R drive-train installed.

Personally, I'm not a fan of the R33 either, but I've gotta give credit for the work that's been put into the Advan car.

So by the same token Autech did exactly the same thing with the 260RS. Not too many complaints about that car. Only thing of note was the popular R34 GTR nose conversion.

Unless you've actually seen the vehicle in person, please don't make armchair judgements about what he is and isn't selling.

I'm not making judgement. I'm stating a FACT.

The car is a GTS4, and it is being sold as a GTR.

Now you bring AUTECH into this... Lets have a think about this... Autech is what? A Subsidiary of Nissan. IE, it is like HSV to Holden. What they badge their cars, is what they actually are... Autech 260RS = a factory vehicle. IE, Nissan may as well have just sold it as a Nissan 260RS.

The big difference would be, the Autech could have any number of huge power modifications made to it by Autech, but that's classified as FACTORY. So when you go to get your insurance you list it as an Autech 260RS that is STANDARD. This car you would need to list as a Nissan Skyline GTS4 (Because that's what it is) and then list each and every modification, and make sure engineering covers each and every modification.

I hope you can see the difference between calling a factory car a factory car, and calling a highly modified car a completely different model of car.

I'm not making judgement. I'm stating a FACT.

The car is a GTS4, and it is being sold as a GTR.

Now you bring AUTECH into this... Lets have a think about this... Autech is what? A Subsidiary of Nissan. IE, it is like HSV to Holden. What they badge their cars, is what they actually are... Autech 260RS = a factory vehicle. IE, Nissan may as well have just sold it as a Nissan 260RS.

The big difference would be, the Autech could have any number of huge power modifications made to it by Autech, but that's classified as FACTORY. So when you go to get your insurance you list it as an Autech 260RS that is STANDARD. This car you would need to list as a Nissan Skyline GTS4 (Because that's what it is) and then list each and every modification, and make sure engineering covers each and every modification.

I hope you can see the difference between calling a factory car a factory car, and calling a highly modified car a completely different model of car.

I brought Autech into this as I thought you were concerned about the quality of replication due to the car being a conversion.

....after all that, the weight of your argument which justifies the reduction of the asking price by $40-50K is the fact that you would have to list all the mods on your insurance policy (which you probably already do for your current vehicle)........and that the vehicle would be listed as a GTS4 instead of a GTR (which might even save you some money on your premium.....god knows I'm paying more per year on my GTR then I ever was on my old GTST).......

THAT is your justification???

I know your concerned about the re-badging and calling it something it's not but trust me when I say (with exception of the sunroof and VIN) this thing is about as much a GTS4 as what's sitting in my garage right now.

Also, I don't know why your talking about engineering (I assume you mean VSCCS compliance).

The vehicle was personally imported and complied with the mods already done (Yellow Tag). The vehicle is VSCCS compliant.

.....I don't recall Autech actually selling any vehicle through Nissan that had what you call "huge power modifications" either. Even with the radical design changes of some, they were still lightly tuned. They still had to suit the requirements of the JDM after all.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...