Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Embarrassing as it is to admit, after nearly 2 years of ownership, I have only just found an fairly significant issue with one of my rear rotors. It is too small..

I had the right rear wheel off, and thought I would check the brakes while I was there, and found the 2 rear pads overhang the edge of the rotor by about 3-4mm. Thinking there was something out of place, I thoroughly checked everything and couldn't see what was wrong. Until I compared with the other side.

I didn't actually remove the rotors to confirm, but there is about 10mm difference in the rotor diameter between the left and right side. And the rotor shield is also a different size. The callipers and pads are the same.

The right side (too small) is approximately 290mm and the left side is approx. 300mm. Although these are rough figures, I can confirm the distance between the edge of the hub and the edge of the rotor is 55mm on the right rotor, and 60mm on the left. A rough measurement of the hub section is 180mm diameter.

I have searched the forums and could only find one size for the non-brembo rear rotors, 292mm, so I don't know where this smaller rotor has come from.

I am guessing I will just need to buy a new rotor and shield, but I don't want to order one, only to find it is the same small size.

Can anyone shed any light on this? other than the diameter, the rotor looks exactly the same.

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/427462-2005-sedan-rear-brake-rotor-size/
Share on other sites

I have done some further research and couldn't find any different rotor sizes on the G/V35, but did find the 06+ 350Z does have larger diameter rotors, so I'm not sure if Nissan used these on the V35 at some point?

I will remove the wheels and rotors on the weekend and get some real measurements rather than estimating.

Here are some pictures for reference, in case anyone has any suggestions.

post-84647-0-78293300-1372151128_thumb.jpg

Left side

post-84647-0-50478400-1372151171_thumb.jpg

Right side (too small)

Well, I removed the rear rotors to measure.

the right rotor (the one too small) has a diameter of 292mm, and one on the left (correct size), is 308mm.

I looked up the DBA page and it seems the 05+ 350z (non brembo) runs 308mm rear rotors, and the pre05 model uses 292mm.

I also checked the front rotor size as they are also different between the 2 year ranges of 350z and found mine are 320mm, which the DBA page also lists for a 05+ 350z, the pre05 models have a 296mm fronts.

Also, by looking at 'private's' post, it seems the S1 V35 have single piston front callipers, but mine has twin.

for some reason, I couldn't find any reference to the V35 having these larger brakes. every page I looked at showed the smaller size rotors for 02-06 skylines.

  • 1 month later...

Indeed! The weird part is the rotor shield was also the smaller size. I am guessing the hub may have been damaged a some point and a mechanic has just removed the whole hub, rotor shield and rotor from a donar S1, and bolted it on, but kept the original callipers.

So I had to replace the shield and rotor to get everything back to normal.

What also concerned me is if you look up almost any catalogue for the V35, it lists the smaller rotors for the entire model run (01-06). You need to look up the 05+ 350Z to get the correct rotors for the S2 and S3.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would hope so. I worry that it also might depend on whether the person working on the claim has had a good day or not. I could imagine that for example modified brakes would be an easy thing to point to for affecting the outcome of an accident. I don't know. I will keep paying my premium and hope for the best. But at the same time keep safe distances, drive defensively and avoid dickhead P-platers in lifted utes  
    • I was just working on the assumption that a cammed V8 is significantly less polluty than a Japanese I6 turbo was at the way they tested it in an IM240. Perhaps I'm wrong! Perhaps cutting one of the readings I got in half is a tall order. I don't know too many people who actually got their cars emission tested with a RB to really compare the data.
    • I thought it was just if “the modification effected/caused the incident”
    • Ok, good to know. I have open loop I think, I forgot which ones which but I am running the o2 sensor, brand new and I got a new boost solenoid because my last one was faulty and overboosting by a lot, but it's still technically overboosting. Haven't really bothered to hunt it down as I don't send it hard regularly.
    • You should not be able to see much smoke behind you if the mixtures are good - for ~13-14 psi anyway. It's not like you need to be running hell rich for only that much boost/load. Your tune might be a tad too rich. The tuner might have done that because they like to run a lot of timing. It's impossible to know what's going on from here. It won't be the actuator. It won't be the MAP sensor. Regardless of if by "MAP sensor" you mean either the Neo ECU's boost sensor (which is literally only that, a boost sensor so that the ECU knows a) that it's achieving boost, and b) that it is not overboosting) or you mean the dash gauge's MAP sensor (because it can't have any effect at all), or you mean the boost controller's MAP sensor (because it is very unlikely that it is running in closed loop, and so it is effectively just used to know when the pressure goes positive and so you can see the boost on the display, for the most part).
×
×
  • Create New...