Jump to content
SAU Community

HELP!!! defected again and first EPA.........


Recommended Posts

Guest INASNT

LOL

Welcome to the canary club!!!! :D

As said before youe only allowed one intake mod, FMIC or Pod, and most times you need an non-oiled based paper type pod to be 100% safe when you do the test. When they do the dB test they will rev ur car to 5000rpm as thats what they are meant to coz its 75% of the power band. For the emmision test they will also stick a probe on ur cat and check its operating temperature.

Dont stress to much as the epa guys aint like cops, and they are actually preety easy to talk to and long as ur car looks preety stock they will pass you.

I think ronin09 still has his stock cat back system, which i borrowed about 1 year ago when i had my day at mcloud.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Boys I'll tell you a legal loop hole.

Call the EPA and say you have sold the car. You can say the transfer papers are yet to be processed. I would say you do not have contact details of the new owner and therefore can not pass pon the message. They wont have time to follow up on your story.

If you dont like this idea I have stock front pipe and stock BOV

Adzmax: writing that on a publicly watched forum is just silly. Not all law enforcement people will know that info - you are helping spread it! Thanks :(

This guy has an R33 gtst with aftermarket hid's which are probably legal so please edit your post :D

Are you for real?? As if they don't know that already and I think you'll find they are not. Do you think the whole of the Victorian police force has nothing better to do than surf these forums to get their information?? In any case I'll edit it just for you.

Thanks for editing, but if you disagree with me then put it back. I am not the forum police.

Real Police do watch forums.

A lot of police dont have a clue about what is legal on cars and what isnt - you must know this? They just hand out fines because we are clearly not paying enough tax!

I know it is strange, but when the car came from Japan, it already got PFC and the SAFC. I don't know why the Japanese owner want to do that, but good for me instead.

more question, before I go to the EPA, I just unplugged the unit of the booster and  turbo timer and leave the wiring in the car, is that possible? car still can move? I know if unplugged the SAFC the car won't start.

Well take the SAF-C right out totally, here is your chance.

No, you cant leave all the wiring in the car, and just take the screens out.

That doesnt work.

You solenoids will still be in the engine bay, and the EPA will find them.

The EPA will also go right over your car if they see you have wires floating around as then know it's then modified and you'll fail.

As everyone has said. take everything off

Right down to the wiring for SAF-C, boost solenoids, pod (just for the hassle)

absolutely everything.

Nicky: where did you get the info for EPA rules etc. Only thing i saw on their website was related to like noisy neighbours.

Pawson: " know it is strange, but when the car came from Japan, it already got PFC and the SAFC. I don't know why the Japanese owner want to do that, but good for me instead."- i was under the impression your car had to be stock to be complied.

Curious to see more information regarding pods/fmic/etc. i heard there was some issue with oily filters, but k&n are sold legally at autobarn (or so my friend who worked there said).

with the SAFC, the wires are not in the engine bay. It connects directly to the ECU hidden on the passenger side. With the wiring of the SAFC, connect the standard yellow wires (air flow) and your car should start like normal. unplug all the other wires and connect back after the EPA test.

I got done recently, Fined $500, 3rd time in 9 months.

They tested my DB at 4800 rpm. They checked my ECU, and AFM as i ran a Link ECU. They said nothing about my Profec B which was simply unplugged or my turbo timer. If you have a FMIC you cannot have a poddy as stated before by other peeps.

True the 2 guys down there are good to chat with, but it burns me when their friendly to you but at the same time dicking around with your car and hand you a $500 fine. The slim fella with short hair greying on the side, said they tend to give us these fines as to them its justifable because we spend so much money on our cars!

  • 1 year later...

Somebody mentioned something about not having a Turbo Timer? I have an EPA test on my 32 GTST on November 10th. The car is pretty much stock apart from exhaust and frontmount. I'm not sure exactly how loud the exhaust is, but it isn't one of those 1s that rumbles all day long, pretty quiet on idle too. So basically, turbo timer must be removed for EPA testing????? :O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...